Identifying herbicides to manage weeds in a buckwheat cover crop and for the control of volunteers

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Taylor Randell-Singleton, Hannah E. Wright-Smith, Lavesta C. Hand, Jenna C. Vance, A. Stanley Culpepper
{"title":"Identifying herbicides to manage weeds in a buckwheat cover crop and for the control of volunteers","authors":"Taylor Randell-Singleton,&nbsp;Hannah E. Wright-Smith,&nbsp;Lavesta C. Hand,&nbsp;Jenna C. Vance,&nbsp;A. Stanley Culpepper","doi":"10.1002/cft2.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Buckwheat (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i>) is a fast-growing plant that quickly produces a dense groundcover. The utilization of buckwheat as a cover crop in vegetable production could be beneficial to Georgia producers, however for successful adoption, weed control in the cover crop coupled with control of buckwheat volunteers must be achievable. A preemergence (PRE) and a postemergence (POST) experiment were each conducted three times in Ty Ty, GA (2020–2021) addressing these objectives. In the PRE study, acetochlor at 0.56 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> injured buckwheat up to 16% without negatively influencing growth, suggesting potential for use in buckwheat for weed control. Flumioxazin, fomesafen, halosulfuron, ethalfluralin and <i>S</i>-metolachlor lacked adequate buckwheat safety. However, flumioxazin at 0.05 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, fomesafen at 0.19 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>, and halosulfuron at 0.02 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup> were identified as effective options to manage volunteer plants, as control exceeded 80%. In the POST experiment, buckwheat injury from 2,4-D, clethodim, dicamba, glufosinate, glyphosate, halosulfuron, linuron, paraquat, and prometryn was evaluated, and when considering all evaluation parameters, paraquat (0.50 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) was the most effective option for the control of buckwheat. This was followed by glufosinate (0.59 and 1.17 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) and glyphosate (1.20 and 2.40 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>). For potential applications over buckwheat for weed management, clethodim (0.12 lb ai acre<sup>−1</sup>) was the only POST herbicide that provided adequate crop safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cft2.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.70034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is a fast-growing plant that quickly produces a dense groundcover. The utilization of buckwheat as a cover crop in vegetable production could be beneficial to Georgia producers, however for successful adoption, weed control in the cover crop coupled with control of buckwheat volunteers must be achievable. A preemergence (PRE) and a postemergence (POST) experiment were each conducted three times in Ty Ty, GA (2020–2021) addressing these objectives. In the PRE study, acetochlor at 0.56 lb ai acre−1 injured buckwheat up to 16% without negatively influencing growth, suggesting potential for use in buckwheat for weed control. Flumioxazin, fomesafen, halosulfuron, ethalfluralin and S-metolachlor lacked adequate buckwheat safety. However, flumioxazin at 0.05 lb ai acre−1, fomesafen at 0.19 lb ai acre−1, and halosulfuron at 0.02 lb ai acre−1 were identified as effective options to manage volunteer plants, as control exceeded 80%. In the POST experiment, buckwheat injury from 2,4-D, clethodim, dicamba, glufosinate, glyphosate, halosulfuron, linuron, paraquat, and prometryn was evaluated, and when considering all evaluation parameters, paraquat (0.50 lb ai acre−1) was the most effective option for the control of buckwheat. This was followed by glufosinate (0.59 and 1.17 lb ai acre−1) and glyphosate (1.20 and 2.40 lb ai acre−1). For potential applications over buckwheat for weed management, clethodim (0.12 lb ai acre−1) was the only POST herbicide that provided adequate crop safety.

确定用于管理荞麦覆盖作物杂草的除草剂,并对志愿者进行控制
荞麦(Fagopyrum esculentum)是一种快速生长的植物,可以迅速产生密集的地被植物。在蔬菜生产中利用荞麦作为覆盖作物可能对格鲁吉亚生产者有益,但要成功采用,必须实现覆盖作物中的杂草控制以及荞麦志愿者的控制。为了实现这些目标,在乔治亚州Ty Ty(2020-2021)分别进行了三次出现前(PRE)和出现后(POST)实验。在PRE研究中,0.56 lb / acre - 1的乙草胺对荞麦的伤害高达16%,但对其生长没有负面影响,这表明在荞麦中有可能用于杂草控制。氟恶嗪、氟美沙芬、氟磺隆、氟乙烷和s -甲草胺缺乏足够的荞麦安全性。然而,氟恶嗪0.05 lb / acre - 1、氟美沙芬0.19 lb / acre - 1和氟磺隆0.02 lb / acre - 1被确定为管理志愿植物的有效选择,因为控制率超过80%。在POST试验中,对2,4- d、杀虫灵、麦草畏、草甘膦、草甘膦、氟磺隆、利脲隆、百草枯和promedyyn对荞麦的危害进行了评价,综合所有评价参数,百草枯(0.50 lb / acre - 1)是防治荞麦最有效的选择。其次是草甘膦(0.59和1.17磅每英亩- 1)和草甘膦(1.20和2.40磅每英亩- 1)。对于荞麦杂草管理的潜在应用,clethodim (0.12 lb / acre - 1)是唯一提供足够作物安全性的POST除草剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信