Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting on abandoned calcareous grassland in Hainich National Park, Germany

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Bob O. van Leeuwen , Quiniver Tuinder , Thomas Fartmann , Gwydion Scherer , Alisa Klamm , Madlen Schellenberg , Philippine Vergeer , Patrick A. Jansen
{"title":"Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting on abandoned calcareous grassland in Hainich National Park, Germany","authors":"Bob O. van Leeuwen ,&nbsp;Quiniver Tuinder ,&nbsp;Thomas Fartmann ,&nbsp;Gwydion Scherer ,&nbsp;Alisa Klamm ,&nbsp;Madlen Schellenberg ,&nbsp;Philippine Vergeer ,&nbsp;Patrick A. Jansen","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Calcareous grasslands are semi-natural biodiverse ecosystems that hold high conservation value, but are threatened throughout Europe. Abandoned calcareous grasslands become afforested unless succession is reset. We tested the idea that wild boar (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) rooting activity could serve as a means to reset succession and thereby maintain characteristic herbaceous plant diversity in calcareous grasslands. We compared vascular plant abundance and environmental parameters between plots rooted by wild boar and undisturbed plots in unmanaged calcareous grasslands in Hainich National Park, Germany. We found that rooted plots had lower grass cover and higher herb cover, and a significantly higher species richness, Shannon diversity index and evenness. Indicator species analysis differentiated 23 species for rooted plots, and 8 for undisturbed plots. Of 17 characteristic species for calcareous grasslands, two were significant indicators in rooted plots, and one in undisturbed plots, while 14 did not differentiate between the treatments. Our findings suggest that wild boar rooting activity in Hainich National Park may maintain characteristic calcareous grassland vegetation, by resetting early grassland succession and enhancing heterogeneity, which in turn helps sustaining biodiversity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article e03535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcareous grasslands are semi-natural biodiverse ecosystems that hold high conservation value, but are threatened throughout Europe. Abandoned calcareous grasslands become afforested unless succession is reset. We tested the idea that wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting activity could serve as a means to reset succession and thereby maintain characteristic herbaceous plant diversity in calcareous grasslands. We compared vascular plant abundance and environmental parameters between plots rooted by wild boar and undisturbed plots in unmanaged calcareous grasslands in Hainich National Park, Germany. We found that rooted plots had lower grass cover and higher herb cover, and a significantly higher species richness, Shannon diversity index and evenness. Indicator species analysis differentiated 23 species for rooted plots, and 8 for undisturbed plots. Of 17 characteristic species for calcareous grasslands, two were significant indicators in rooted plots, and one in undisturbed plots, while 14 did not differentiate between the treatments. Our findings suggest that wild boar rooting activity in Hainich National Park may maintain characteristic calcareous grassland vegetation, by resetting early grassland succession and enhancing heterogeneity, which in turn helps sustaining biodiversity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信