{"title":"Mechanism design for sharing critical medical resources in pandemic","authors":"Nifei Lin , Xin Yun , L. Jeff Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maintaining a sufficient national stockpile of critical medical resources and optimizing their strategic allocation across regions are essential for managing public health crises in any country during pandemics. Challenges arise from the unsustainability of stockpiles of critical medical resources and the deep uncertainty surrounding pandemics. This paper redesigns the inventory logic of critical medical resources by proposing a resource-sharing incentive mechanism to alleviate long-term supply chain pressures. Following the concept of risk pooling through inventory sharing, the mechanism encourages local governments to contribute their excess stockpiles to a centralized repository, managed and reallocated by the federal government according to established guidelines. Using the ventilator shortage during COVID-19 as a case study, we develop a model that captures the stochastic nature of pandemic trends over time and design a game model between national and local governments. Assuming specific pandemic trends, we demonstrate that the proposed incentive mechanism makes sharing ventilators a dominant strategy, significantly reducing total medical resource deficits. Furthermore, we validate the mechanism’s efficiency through simulations of more complex pandemic scenarios. Both theoretical and numerical analyses emphasize the importance of maintaining a minimum national stockpile as a strategic reserve and underscore the necessity of robust supply chain management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103318"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325000441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Maintaining a sufficient national stockpile of critical medical resources and optimizing their strategic allocation across regions are essential for managing public health crises in any country during pandemics. Challenges arise from the unsustainability of stockpiles of critical medical resources and the deep uncertainty surrounding pandemics. This paper redesigns the inventory logic of critical medical resources by proposing a resource-sharing incentive mechanism to alleviate long-term supply chain pressures. Following the concept of risk pooling through inventory sharing, the mechanism encourages local governments to contribute their excess stockpiles to a centralized repository, managed and reallocated by the federal government according to established guidelines. Using the ventilator shortage during COVID-19 as a case study, we develop a model that captures the stochastic nature of pandemic trends over time and design a game model between national and local governments. Assuming specific pandemic trends, we demonstrate that the proposed incentive mechanism makes sharing ventilators a dominant strategy, significantly reducing total medical resource deficits. Furthermore, we validate the mechanism’s efficiency through simulations of more complex pandemic scenarios. Both theoretical and numerical analyses emphasize the importance of maintaining a minimum national stockpile as a strategic reserve and underscore the necessity of robust supply chain management.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.