AF-MCDC: Active Feedback-Based Malicious Client Dynamic Detection

IF 4.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Hongyu Du , Shouhui Zhang , Xi Xv , Yimu Ji , Sisi Shao , Fei Wu , Shangdong Liu
{"title":"AF-MCDC: Active Feedback-Based Malicious Client Dynamic Detection","authors":"Hongyu Du ,&nbsp;Shouhui Zhang ,&nbsp;Xi Xv ,&nbsp;Yimu Ji ,&nbsp;Sisi Shao ,&nbsp;Fei Wu ,&nbsp;Shangdong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Federated Learning (FL) has long been known for separating the training and model construction processes, ensuring the privacy of participating clients. However, this separation also introduces a new attack surface. Due to the decentralization feature, Federal Learning is prone to Byzantine attacks. Attackers can deliberately corrupt or malfunction one or more participants in the federated network, disrupting the overall model training process. Researchers have proposed many defense mechanisms to mitigate Byzantine attacks. Their main ideas include eliminating malicious updates that deviate from the overall distribution through similarity detection and avoiding malicious parameters using statistical characteristics. Yet, these defense mechanisms are usually passive, detection only happens on the central server, neglecting the important role of clients. Thus we propose AF-MCDC: Active Feedback-Based Malicious Client Dynamic Detection, a byzantine-robust federated learning method taking advantage of valid clients. What sets AF-MCDC apart from existing robust federated learning methods is its three-pronged defense approach. First, a detection mechanism is deployed on each client to verify the integrity of the distributed global model. If the model fails the integrity check, it will not be used to initialize the local model. On the server side, a decision is made based on the detection results uploaded by the clients, followed by performance scoring using cosine similarity among federated clients. Finally, a dynamic weighting mechanism based on client score rankings is applied to weigh the local models uploaded by all clients, effectively filtering out malicious clients Evaluation of two datasets, MNIST and CIFAR-10, demonstrates that AF-MCDC is robust against a significant portion of malicious clients. Furthermore, even when over half of the clients are malicious, AF-MCDC can still train a global model with performance comparable to the global model learned by FedAvg under non-adversarial conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50637,"journal":{"name":"Computer Networks","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 111234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128625002026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) has long been known for separating the training and model construction processes, ensuring the privacy of participating clients. However, this separation also introduces a new attack surface. Due to the decentralization feature, Federal Learning is prone to Byzantine attacks. Attackers can deliberately corrupt or malfunction one or more participants in the federated network, disrupting the overall model training process. Researchers have proposed many defense mechanisms to mitigate Byzantine attacks. Their main ideas include eliminating malicious updates that deviate from the overall distribution through similarity detection and avoiding malicious parameters using statistical characteristics. Yet, these defense mechanisms are usually passive, detection only happens on the central server, neglecting the important role of clients. Thus we propose AF-MCDC: Active Feedback-Based Malicious Client Dynamic Detection, a byzantine-robust federated learning method taking advantage of valid clients. What sets AF-MCDC apart from existing robust federated learning methods is its three-pronged defense approach. First, a detection mechanism is deployed on each client to verify the integrity of the distributed global model. If the model fails the integrity check, it will not be used to initialize the local model. On the server side, a decision is made based on the detection results uploaded by the clients, followed by performance scoring using cosine similarity among federated clients. Finally, a dynamic weighting mechanism based on client score rankings is applied to weigh the local models uploaded by all clients, effectively filtering out malicious clients Evaluation of two datasets, MNIST and CIFAR-10, demonstrates that AF-MCDC is robust against a significant portion of malicious clients. Furthermore, even when over half of the clients are malicious, AF-MCDC can still train a global model with performance comparable to the global model learned by FedAvg under non-adversarial conditions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Networks
Computer Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
434
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Computer Networks is an international, archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in the computer communications networking area. The audience includes researchers, managers and operators of networks as well as designers and implementors. The Editorial Board will consider any material for publication that is of interest to those groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信