Ilaria Maccora , Carine Wouters , Carlos D. Rosè , Valerio Maniscalco , Salvatore de Masi , Maria Vincenza Mastrolia , Edoardo Marrani , Ilaria Pagnini , Gabriele Simonini
{"title":"Treatment of uveitis in Blau syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ilaria Maccora , Carine Wouters , Carlos D. Rosè , Valerio Maniscalco , Salvatore de Masi , Maria Vincenza Mastrolia , Edoardo Marrani , Ilaria Pagnini , Gabriele Simonini","doi":"10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Blau syndrome (BS) is a rare autoinflammatory disease caused by gain of function variants in NOD2. Uveitis is one of the triad features with arthritis and dermatitis. Management of uveitis is challenging, and uncontrolled uveitis may lead to blindness. We aim to evaluate the evidence regarding effectiveness of systemic treatments, including conventional Disease Modifying anti-Rheumatic drugs(cDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs(bDMARDs), for the management of uveitis in BS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Papers were selected if they reported patients with BS and uveitis who received systemic treatment. Papers were selected if reporting efficacy according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1205 papers with 11 selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Among the 11 selected papers, we identified 88 treatments. Among these, 53 were cDMARDs (36 methotrexate, 7 azathioprine, 5 mycophenolate, 3 thalidomide, 1 tacrolimus and 1 cyclosporine) and 35 bDMARDs (23 adalimumab, 6 infliximab, 4 etanercept, 1 golimumab and 1 canakinumab). The proportion of children showing improvement of uveitis was 20 % (95 % CI 2–46) and 22 % (95 % CI3-47) for cDMARDs and bDMARDs respectively (χ<sup>2</sup>0.23, p = 0.631). No differences were observed among the administered drugs (χ<sup>2</sup>7.21, p = 0.706).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The data show that there is not enough evidence to establish a preferred treatment for managing uveitis in BS. Considering the rarity, the potential severity and refractoriness to current treatments of the disease, there is a critical need for better understanding of pathophysiology and expert driven treatment guidelines for of BS-uveitis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoimmunity","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 103401"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896841125000460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Blau syndrome (BS) is a rare autoinflammatory disease caused by gain of function variants in NOD2. Uveitis is one of the triad features with arthritis and dermatitis. Management of uveitis is challenging, and uncontrolled uveitis may lead to blindness. We aim to evaluate the evidence regarding effectiveness of systemic treatments, including conventional Disease Modifying anti-Rheumatic drugs(cDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs(bDMARDs), for the management of uveitis in BS.
Methods
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Papers were selected if they reported patients with BS and uveitis who received systemic treatment. Papers were selected if reporting efficacy according to Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria.
Results
We identified 1205 papers with 11 selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Among the 11 selected papers, we identified 88 treatments. Among these, 53 were cDMARDs (36 methotrexate, 7 azathioprine, 5 mycophenolate, 3 thalidomide, 1 tacrolimus and 1 cyclosporine) and 35 bDMARDs (23 adalimumab, 6 infliximab, 4 etanercept, 1 golimumab and 1 canakinumab). The proportion of children showing improvement of uveitis was 20 % (95 % CI 2–46) and 22 % (95 % CI3-47) for cDMARDs and bDMARDs respectively (χ20.23, p = 0.631). No differences were observed among the administered drugs (χ27.21, p = 0.706).
Conclusion
The data show that there is not enough evidence to establish a preferred treatment for managing uveitis in BS. Considering the rarity, the potential severity and refractoriness to current treatments of the disease, there is a critical need for better understanding of pathophysiology and expert driven treatment guidelines for of BS-uveitis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Autoimmunity serves as the primary publication for research on various facets of autoimmunity. These include topics such as the mechanism of self-recognition, regulation of autoimmune responses, experimental autoimmune diseases, diagnostic tests for autoantibodies, as well as the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of autoimmune diseases. While the journal covers a wide range of subjects, it emphasizes papers exploring the genetic, molecular biology, and cellular aspects of the field.
The Journal of Translational Autoimmunity, on the other hand, is a subsidiary journal of the Journal of Autoimmunity. It focuses specifically on translating scientific discoveries in autoimmunity into clinical applications and practical solutions. By highlighting research that bridges the gap between basic science and clinical practice, the Journal of Translational Autoimmunity aims to advance the understanding and treatment of autoimmune diseases.