Towards trustworthy civil aviation hazards identification: An uncertainty-aware deep learning framework

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Zhaoguo Hou , Huawei Wang , Minglan Xiong , Changwei Zhou , Yubin Yue
{"title":"Towards trustworthy civil aviation hazards identification: An uncertainty-aware deep learning framework","authors":"Zhaoguo Hou ,&nbsp;Huawei Wang ,&nbsp;Minglan Xiong ,&nbsp;Changwei Zhou ,&nbsp;Yubin Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate and trustworthy hazards identification is crucial for preventing accidents and ensuring flight safety. However, deep learning-based identification methods are limited by their black-box characteristics to provide trustworthy and interpretable results. Existing research on interpretable civil aviation hazard identification focuses on developing interpretable modules to be embedded in deep learning models to give engineering meaning to the results; or inferring the logic of the model’s decision-making based on the results. However, there is limited research on how to quantify and explain the uncertainty in the results. Quantifying and decomposing uncertainty not only provides confidence of results but also helps to identify the sources of unknown factors in the data, thereby providing guidance for improving model interpretability. Therefore, this paper proposes an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for trustworthy civil aviation hazards identification. Firstly, a Bayesian multi-scale attention convolutional neural network with an integrated Monte Carlo dropout mechanism was designed, which can estimate the uncertainty of model predictions through internal randomness, thereby endowing the network with the uncertainty-aware ability. Secondly, a set of uncertainty quantification and decomposition schemes was established, which can achieve the confidence representation of the identification results and the separation of epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty. Finally, an adjustable uncertainty decision threshold was constructed, which can be dynamically adjusted according to the risk level of application scenarios to achieve the optimal risk management. In out-of-distribution test scenarios with unknown hazards, comparisons with existing identification methods demonstrate that the proposed framework has superior uncertainty-aware capabilities and potential for engineering application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103280"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625001739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate and trustworthy hazards identification is crucial for preventing accidents and ensuring flight safety. However, deep learning-based identification methods are limited by their black-box characteristics to provide trustworthy and interpretable results. Existing research on interpretable civil aviation hazard identification focuses on developing interpretable modules to be embedded in deep learning models to give engineering meaning to the results; or inferring the logic of the model’s decision-making based on the results. However, there is limited research on how to quantify and explain the uncertainty in the results. Quantifying and decomposing uncertainty not only provides confidence of results but also helps to identify the sources of unknown factors in the data, thereby providing guidance for improving model interpretability. Therefore, this paper proposes an uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for trustworthy civil aviation hazards identification. Firstly, a Bayesian multi-scale attention convolutional neural network with an integrated Monte Carlo dropout mechanism was designed, which can estimate the uncertainty of model predictions through internal randomness, thereby endowing the network with the uncertainty-aware ability. Secondly, a set of uncertainty quantification and decomposition schemes was established, which can achieve the confidence representation of the identification results and the separation of epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty. Finally, an adjustable uncertainty decision threshold was constructed, which can be dynamically adjusted according to the risk level of application scenarios to achieve the optimal risk management. In out-of-distribution test scenarios with unknown hazards, comparisons with existing identification methods demonstrate that the proposed framework has superior uncertainty-aware capabilities and potential for engineering application.
面向可信赖的民航危险识别:一个不确定性感知深度学习框架
准确可信的危险源识别是防止事故发生、保障飞行安全的关键。然而,基于深度学习的识别方法受到其黑箱特性的限制,无法提供可信和可解释的结果。现有的可解释民用航空危害识别研究主要集中在开发可解释模块,将其嵌入到深度学习模型中,使结果具有工程意义;或者根据结果推断模型决策的逻辑。然而,如何量化和解释结果中的不确定性的研究有限。对不确定性进行量化和分解,不仅可以提高结果的可信度,而且有助于识别数据中未知因素的来源,从而为提高模型的可解释性提供指导。因此,本文提出了一种不确定性感知的民航危险度可信识别深度学习框架。首先,设计了集成蒙特卡罗dropout机制的贝叶斯多尺度注意卷积神经网络,通过内部随机性估计模型预测的不确定性,使网络具有不确定性感知能力;其次,建立了一套不确定度量化与分解方案,实现了识别结果的置信度表示和认知不确定性与任意不确定性的分离;最后,构建了一个可调的不确定性决策阈值,可根据应用场景的风险等级动态调整该阈值,实现最优风险管理。通过与现有辨识方法的比较,验证了该辨识框架具有较强的不确定性感知能力和工程应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信