A Toxic Euphemism Detection framework for online social network based on Semantic Contrastive Learning and dual channel knowledge augmentation

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Gang Zhou , Haizhou Wang , Di Jin , Wenxian Wang , Shuyu Jiang , Rui Tang , Xingshu Chen
{"title":"A Toxic Euphemism Detection framework for online social network based on Semantic Contrastive Learning and dual channel knowledge augmentation","authors":"Gang Zhou ,&nbsp;Haizhou Wang ,&nbsp;Di Jin ,&nbsp;Wenxian Wang ,&nbsp;Shuyu Jiang ,&nbsp;Rui Tang ,&nbsp;Xingshu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For real-time content moderation systems, detecting toxic euphemisms remains a significant challenge due to the lack of available annotated datasets and the ability to deeply identify euphemistic toxicity. In this paper, we proposed the TED-SCL framework (Toxic Euphemism Detection based on Semantic Contrastive Learning) to solve these problems. Firstly, we collected nearly 8 million comments and constructed a toxic euphemism dataset (TE-Dataset), which contains 18,971 comments, covering six topics and 424 PTETs (Potential Toxic Euphemism Terms). Next, we employed contrastive learning to separate toxic euphemism samples from harmless ones in semantic space and enhance the model’s ability to capture subtle differences. Lastly, we utilized a dual channel knowledge augmentation module to integrate background knowledge with toxic comments and improve the identification of toxic euphemisms. Experimental results demonstrate that TED-SCL outperforms existing SOTA in toxic euphemism detection tasks, achieving accuracy of 93.94%, recall of 93.36%, and F1 score of 93.23%. Furthermore, TED-SCL demonstrates better generalization, zero-shot capability, and greater robustness on different topics and datasets, which provides a new way for real-time content moderation systems to detect euphemistic and implicit toxicity effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"62 4","pages":"Article 104143"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325000846","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For real-time content moderation systems, detecting toxic euphemisms remains a significant challenge due to the lack of available annotated datasets and the ability to deeply identify euphemistic toxicity. In this paper, we proposed the TED-SCL framework (Toxic Euphemism Detection based on Semantic Contrastive Learning) to solve these problems. Firstly, we collected nearly 8 million comments and constructed a toxic euphemism dataset (TE-Dataset), which contains 18,971 comments, covering six topics and 424 PTETs (Potential Toxic Euphemism Terms). Next, we employed contrastive learning to separate toxic euphemism samples from harmless ones in semantic space and enhance the model’s ability to capture subtle differences. Lastly, we utilized a dual channel knowledge augmentation module to integrate background knowledge with toxic comments and improve the identification of toxic euphemisms. Experimental results demonstrate that TED-SCL outperforms existing SOTA in toxic euphemism detection tasks, achieving accuracy of 93.94%, recall of 93.36%, and F1 score of 93.23%. Furthermore, TED-SCL demonstrates better generalization, zero-shot capability, and greater robustness on different topics and datasets, which provides a new way for real-time content moderation systems to detect euphemistic and implicit toxicity effectively.
基于语义对比学习和双通道知识增强的在线社交网络有毒委婉语检测框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信