Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Using the DenseNet-121 Model: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Yurui Hu, Tianyu Liu, Shutong Pang, Xiao Ling, Zhanqiu Wang, Wenfei Li
{"title":"Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Using the DenseNet-121 Model: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yurui Hu, Tianyu Liu, Shutong Pang, Xiao Ling, Zhanqiu Wang, Wenfei Li","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01475-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore the diagnostic value of deep learning (DL) imaging based on MRI in predicting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in high-risk pregnant women. A total of 263 patients with suspected placenta accreta from Institution I and Institution II were retrospectively analyzed and divided into training (n = 170) and external verification sets (n = 93). Through imaging acquisition, feature extraction, and radiomic data processing, 15 radiomic features were used to train support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and DL models to predict PAS. The diagnostic performances of the models were evaluated in the training set using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy and further validated in the external verification set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of cesarean section, placental thickness, and placenta previa were independent clinical risk factors for predicting PAS. Among machine learning (ML) models, SVM demonstrated the highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.944), with an accuracy of 0.876. The diagnostic efficiency of the DL model was significantly better than that of other models, with an AUC of 0.956 (95% CI 0.931-0.981) in the training set and 0.863 (95% CI 0.816-0.910) in the external verification set. In terms of specificity, the DL model outperformed the ML models. The DL model based on MRI may demonstrate better performance in the diagnosis of PAS compared to traditional clinical models or ML radiomics models, as further confirmed by the external verification set.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01475-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore the diagnostic value of deep learning (DL) imaging based on MRI in predicting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in high-risk pregnant women. A total of 263 patients with suspected placenta accreta from Institution I and Institution II were retrospectively analyzed and divided into training (n = 170) and external verification sets (n = 93). Through imaging acquisition, feature extraction, and radiomic data processing, 15 radiomic features were used to train support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and DL models to predict PAS. The diagnostic performances of the models were evaluated in the training set using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy and further validated in the external verification set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of cesarean section, placental thickness, and placenta previa were independent clinical risk factors for predicting PAS. Among machine learning (ML) models, SVM demonstrated the highest diagnostic power (AUC = 0.944), with an accuracy of 0.876. The diagnostic efficiency of the DL model was significantly better than that of other models, with an AUC of 0.956 (95% CI 0.931-0.981) in the training set and 0.863 (95% CI 0.816-0.910) in the external verification set. In terms of specificity, the DL model outperformed the ML models. The DL model based on MRI may demonstrate better performance in the diagnosis of PAS compared to traditional clinical models or ML radiomics models, as further confirmed by the external verification set.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信