Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400404
Mirad Taso, Jon Håvard Sommernes, Jarle Sundseth, Are Hugo Pripp, Siri Bjorland, Kaia B Engebretsen, Frode Kolstad, John Anker Zwart, Jens Ivar Brox
{"title":"Surgical versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy.","authors":"Mirad Taso, Jon Håvard Sommernes, Jarle Sundseth, Are Hugo Pripp, Siri Bjorland, Kaia B Engebretsen, Frode Kolstad, John Anker Zwart, Jens Ivar Brox","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical radiculopathy is typically caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. Few trials have compared the efficacy of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted two randomized clinical trials among 180 patients presenting to the Oslo University Hospital in Norway with disabling radicular arm pain and cervical disc herniation (trial 1; n=89) or spondylosis (trial 2; n=91) proven by magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Surgery involved anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Nonsurgical treatment involved three sessions with physical medicine/rehabilitation physicians and three sessions with physiotherapists for functional and cognitive behavioral support. The primary outcome in both trials was the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score (range, 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimal important difference is 15) at 12 months, which was self-reported by the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 87 patients in the disc herniation trial with 12-month data (surgical group, n=45; nonsurgical group, n=42), the mean difference in NDI adjusted for baseline was 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 13.3; P=0.01) in favor of surgical treatment. Among the 88 patients in the spondylosis trial with 12-month data (surgical, n=44; nonsurgical, n=44), the mean difference in NDI adjusted for baseline was 2.3 (95% CI, -4.9 to 9.6; P=0.52). In the disc herniation trial, two patients in the nonsurgical group crossed over to have surgery. In the spondylosis trial, 11 patients in the nonsurgical group crossed over to have surgery. There were no serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with cervical radiculopathy, we found a statistically significant difference for NDI at 12 months in favor of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in the disc herniation trial, but no difference in the spondylosis trial. (Funded by the Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; HSØ#2017057; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03674619.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 4","pages":"EVIDoa2400404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is typically caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. Few trials have compared the efficacy of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for these conditions.

Methods: We conducted two randomized clinical trials among 180 patients presenting to the Oslo University Hospital in Norway with disabling radicular arm pain and cervical disc herniation (trial 1; n=89) or spondylosis (trial 2; n=91) proven by magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Surgery involved anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Nonsurgical treatment involved three sessions with physical medicine/rehabilitation physicians and three sessions with physiotherapists for functional and cognitive behavioral support. The primary outcome in both trials was the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score (range, 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimal important difference is 15) at 12 months, which was self-reported by the patients.

Results: Among the 87 patients in the disc herniation trial with 12-month data (surgical group, n=45; nonsurgical group, n=42), the mean difference in NDI adjusted for baseline was 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 13.3; P=0.01) in favor of surgical treatment. Among the 88 patients in the spondylosis trial with 12-month data (surgical, n=44; nonsurgical, n=44), the mean difference in NDI adjusted for baseline was 2.3 (95% CI, -4.9 to 9.6; P=0.52). In the disc herniation trial, two patients in the nonsurgical group crossed over to have surgery. In the spondylosis trial, 11 patients in the nonsurgical group crossed over to have surgery. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusions: In patients with cervical radiculopathy, we found a statistically significant difference for NDI at 12 months in favor of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in the disc herniation trial, but no difference in the spondylosis trial. (Funded by the Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority; HSØ#2017057; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03674619.).

颈神经根病的手术与非手术治疗。
背景:颈椎神经根病通常由椎间盘突出或颈椎病引起。很少有试验比较手术和非手术治疗这些疾病的疗效。方法:我们在挪威奥斯陆大学医院进行了两项随机临床试验,纳入了180例致残性臂根性疼痛和颈椎间盘突出的患者(试验1;N =89)或颈椎病(试验2;N =91)经磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描证实。患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受手术或非手术治疗。手术包括颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合。非手术治疗包括与物理医学/康复医生进行的三次治疗,以及与物理治疗师进行的三次功能和认知行为支持。两项试验的主要终点均为颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分(范围:0 ~ 100;分数越高表明残疾程度越严重;最小的重要差异是15)在12个月时,这是由患者自我报告的。结果:有12个月资料的87例椎间盘突出患者中(手术组,n=45;非手术组,n=42),基线调整后NDI的平均差异为7.4(95%可信区间[CI], 1.6至13.3;P=0.01),赞成手术治疗。在椎病试验的88例患者中,有12个月的数据(手术,n=44;非手术,n=44),基线调整后NDI的平均差异为2.3 (95% CI, -4.9至9.6;P = 0.52)。在椎间盘突出试验中,非手术组的两名患者进行了手术。在颈椎病试验中,非手术组的11名患者进行了手术。无严重不良事件发生。结论:在颈椎病患者中,我们发现在椎间盘突出试验中,手术治疗与非手术治疗在12个月时NDI有统计学差异,但在颈椎病试验中无差异。(由挪威南部和东部地区卫生局资助;HSØ# 2017057;ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT03674619)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信