The Design of a Randomized Controlled Active Comparator Strategy Trial for Gout: Treat to Target Serum Urate Versus Treat to Avoid Symptoms.

IF 2.8 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Daniel H Solomon, Misti Paudel, Shravani Chitineni, Ana Fernandes, Tammy Pham, Shreya Billa, Chio Yokose, Kiara Tan, Julien J Dedier, Maureen D Dubreuil, John D Fitzgerald, Sally L Hodder, Tuhina Neogi, Michael H Pillinger, Kevin R Riggs, Kenneth G Saag, Paul G Shekelle, Zoe Tseng, Michael Toprover, David S Wei, Michael J Barry, Hyon K Choi
{"title":"The Design of a Randomized Controlled Active Comparator Strategy Trial for Gout: Treat to Target Serum Urate Versus Treat to Avoid Symptoms.","authors":"Daniel H Solomon, Misti Paudel, Shravani Chitineni, Ana Fernandes, Tammy Pham, Shreya Billa, Chio Yokose, Kiara Tan, Julien J Dedier, Maureen D Dubreuil, John D Fitzgerald, Sally L Hodder, Tuhina Neogi, Michael H Pillinger, Kevin R Riggs, Kenneth G Saag, Paul G Shekelle, Zoe Tseng, Michael Toprover, David S Wei, Michael J Barry, Hyon K Choi","doi":"10.1002/acr2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of gout in routine primary care. There is a lack of clarity on whether treating to a target serum urate (TTT-SU) versus treating to avoid symptoms (TTASx) is more effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial aimed at patients in primary care who have known gout, have elevated SU levels, and had at least one flare in the previous 12 months. The trial was designed to be pragmatic and incorporated structured input from primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and patients. The TTASx strategy group will receive weeklong courses of typical therapies for gout flares, such as colchicine, naproxen, or an oral glucocorticoid. The TTT-SU strategy group will receive urate-lowering therapy (primarily allopurinol) with dose titration to maintain an SU level <6 mg/dL, colchicine (or naproxen) prophylaxis for the first six months of urate-lowering therapy, and access to the same flare therapies as the TTASx group. Two clinicians (nurses or physicians) per site will be trained in each strategy to manage the patients in each arm without contamination. Gout flares are the primary outcome and are assessed every two weeks by trained study staff masked to treatment assignment using a validated questionnaire. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Blood pressure control, kidney function, glycemic control, and coronary atherosclerosis are exploratory secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several sites have started prescreening using automated search strategies in their patients' electronic health records. Of the first 1,381 patients found in primary care practices with a history of gout, 691 patients (50%) passed prescreening checks. These potentially eligible participants have a median age of 67 years, 85% are men, median SU levels are 7.2 mg/dL, and 18% are taking low dosages of allopurinol. These patients have been targeted for recruitment efforts that are underway now.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This randomized controlled active comparator strategy trial will answer a key question in the treatment of patients with gout in primary care: the comparative effectiveness of TTT-SU versus TTASx in gout. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will add important information regarding the broader extra-articular and quality-of-life effects of lowering SU levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":93845,"journal":{"name":"ACR open rheumatology","volume":"7 3","pages":"e70012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR open rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of gout in routine primary care. There is a lack of clarity on whether treating to a target serum urate (TTT-SU) versus treating to avoid symptoms (TTASx) is more effective.

Methods: We designed a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial aimed at patients in primary care who have known gout, have elevated SU levels, and had at least one flare in the previous 12 months. The trial was designed to be pragmatic and incorporated structured input from primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and patients. The TTASx strategy group will receive weeklong courses of typical therapies for gout flares, such as colchicine, naproxen, or an oral glucocorticoid. The TTT-SU strategy group will receive urate-lowering therapy (primarily allopurinol) with dose titration to maintain an SU level <6 mg/dL, colchicine (or naproxen) prophylaxis for the first six months of urate-lowering therapy, and access to the same flare therapies as the TTASx group. Two clinicians (nurses or physicians) per site will be trained in each strategy to manage the patients in each arm without contamination. Gout flares are the primary outcome and are assessed every two weeks by trained study staff masked to treatment assignment using a validated questionnaire. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Blood pressure control, kidney function, glycemic control, and coronary atherosclerosis are exploratory secondary outcomes.

Results: Several sites have started prescreening using automated search strategies in their patients' electronic health records. Of the first 1,381 patients found in primary care practices with a history of gout, 691 patients (50%) passed prescreening checks. These potentially eligible participants have a median age of 67 years, 85% are men, median SU levels are 7.2 mg/dL, and 18% are taking low dosages of allopurinol. These patients have been targeted for recruitment efforts that are underway now.

Conclusion: This randomized controlled active comparator strategy trial will answer a key question in the treatment of patients with gout in primary care: the comparative effectiveness of TTT-SU versus TTASx in gout. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will add important information regarding the broader extra-articular and quality-of-life effects of lowering SU levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

痛风随机对照主动比较策略试验的设计:治疗目标血清尿酸与治疗避免症状。
目的:关于痛风在常规初级保健中的最佳管理存在争议。目前尚不清楚针对目标血清尿酸治疗(TTT-SU)与避免症状治疗(TTASx)孰优孰劣。方法:我们设计了一项随机对照比较有效性试验,针对在初级保健中已知痛风,SU水平升高,并且在过去12个月内至少有一次耀斑的患者。该试验的设计是务实的,并纳入了初级保健医生、风湿病学家和患者的结构化输入。TTASx策略组将接受为期一周的典型痛风发作治疗,如秋水仙碱、萘普生或口服糖皮质激素。TTT-SU策略组将接受降尿酸治疗(主要是别嘌呤醇)和剂量滴定以维持SU水平。结果:一些站点已经开始使用自动搜索策略在其患者的电子健康记录中进行预筛选。在初级保健实践中发现的有痛风病史的第一批1381例患者中,691例患者(50%)通过了预筛查检查。这些潜在的合格参与者的中位年龄为67岁,85%为男性,中位素水平为7.2 mg/dL, 18%正在服用低剂量别嘌呤醇。这些患者已成为目前正在进行的招募工作的目标。结论:这项随机对照主动比较策略试验将回答初级保健治疗痛风患者的一个关键问题:TTT-SU与TTASx在痛风治疗中的比较有效性。次要和探索性结果将为降低SU水平的更广泛的关节外和生活质量影响提供重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信