Instrumental Variables in Randomized Trials.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1056/EVIDctw2400204
Joshua D Angrist, Carol Gao, Peter Hull, Robert W Yeh
{"title":"Instrumental Variables in Randomized Trials.","authors":"Joshua D Angrist, Carol Gao, Peter Hull, Robert W Yeh","doi":"10.1056/EVIDctw2400204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractMany randomized clinical trials fail to play out as intended: some participants assigned to the treatment group remain untreated, while others assigned to the control group cross over and receive treatment. In such settings, intention-to-treat analyses that compare participants by treatment assignment are diluted by noncompliance, while per-protocol analyses that compare participants by treatment received are contaminated by selection bias. Instrumental variables methods can address both problems. We explain the rationale for instrumental variables estimation in clinical trials and illustrate instrumental variables methods through an analysis of the effect of revascularization on quality of life. We argue that instrumental variables analysis should be central to pragmatic trials of all kinds, strategy trials in particular, and emerging \"nudge trials\" that encourage specific health-related behaviors in large populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 4","pages":"EVIDctw2400204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDctw2400204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractMany randomized clinical trials fail to play out as intended: some participants assigned to the treatment group remain untreated, while others assigned to the control group cross over and receive treatment. In such settings, intention-to-treat analyses that compare participants by treatment assignment are diluted by noncompliance, while per-protocol analyses that compare participants by treatment received are contaminated by selection bias. Instrumental variables methods can address both problems. We explain the rationale for instrumental variables estimation in clinical trials and illustrate instrumental variables methods through an analysis of the effect of revascularization on quality of life. We argue that instrumental variables analysis should be central to pragmatic trials of all kinds, strategy trials in particular, and emerging "nudge trials" that encourage specific health-related behaviors in large populations.

摘要 许多随机临床试验未能按预期进行:一些被分配到治疗组的参与者仍未接受治疗,而另一些被分配到对照组的参与者则交叉接受了治疗。在这种情况下,按治疗分配对参与者进行比较的意向治疗分析会被不依从性冲淡,而按接受治疗对参与者进行比较的方案分析则会受到选择偏差的影响。工具变量方法可以解决这两个问题。我们解释了在临床试验中进行工具变量估计的原理,并通过分析血管重建对生活质量的影响来说明工具变量方法。我们认为,工具变量分析应该成为各类实用性试验、特别是策略试验以及新兴的 "激励试验 "的核心,这些试验鼓励大量人群采取特定的健康相关行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信