Epidural Analgesia and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Do Hee Lee, Celia Kucera, Melissa Salinas, Charelle M Carter-Brooks
{"title":"Epidural Analgesia and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.","authors":"Do Hee Lee, Celia Kucera, Melissa Salinas, Charelle M Carter-Brooks","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding the association between epidural analgesia and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). There are also few predictive models that document assessment for multicollinearity among risk factors or precisely identify effect modifiers and confounders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, using rigorous statistical methods to identify effect modifiers and confounders in a diverse, urban population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective case-control study of women with singleton vaginal deliveries. Our primary analysis was to assess the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, adjusting for modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. These risk factors were additionally assessed for effect modification and confounding effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample consisted of 1,326 women who had a vaginal delivery. Among the women with OASIs, 218 women (75.4%) had an epidural, and among those without OASIs, 620 women (59.8%) had an epidural (P < 0.001). Epidural analgesia increased the odds of OASIs by 107% (odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval [1.54 to 2.77]). Through further examination of the relationship between OASIs and epidurals, while considering multiple risk factors and addressing multicollinearity, effect modification, and confounding, we identified operative delivery and labor induction as confounding variables. Accounting for these factors mitigated the association between epidural use and OASIs (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval [1.00 to 1.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initially, we found epidural analgesia to be associated with OASIs; however, after performing additional statistical analysis and accounting for additional risk factors, this association was no longer statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There are conflicting data regarding the association between epidural analgesia and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). There are also few predictive models that document assessment for multicollinearity among risk factors or precisely identify effect modifiers and confounders.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, using rigorous statistical methods to identify effect modifiers and confounders in a diverse, urban population.

Study design: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective case-control study of women with singleton vaginal deliveries. Our primary analysis was to assess the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, adjusting for modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. These risk factors were additionally assessed for effect modification and confounding effect.

Results: Our sample consisted of 1,326 women who had a vaginal delivery. Among the women with OASIs, 218 women (75.4%) had an epidural, and among those without OASIs, 620 women (59.8%) had an epidural (P < 0.001). Epidural analgesia increased the odds of OASIs by 107% (odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval [1.54 to 2.77]). Through further examination of the relationship between OASIs and epidurals, while considering multiple risk factors and addressing multicollinearity, effect modification, and confounding, we identified operative delivery and labor induction as confounding variables. Accounting for these factors mitigated the association between epidural use and OASIs (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval [1.00 to 1.91]).

Conclusions: Initially, we found epidural analgesia to be associated with OASIs; however, after performing additional statistical analysis and accounting for additional risk factors, this association was no longer statistically significant.

硬膜外镇痛与产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
重要性:关于硬膜外镇痛与产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIs)之间的关系,存在相互矛盾的数据。也有很少的预测模型,文件评估多重共线性之间的风险因素或准确地识别效果调节剂和混杂因素。目的:本研究的目的是评估硬膜外镇痛与OASIs之间的关系,使用严格的统计方法在不同的城市人群中确定影响因素和混杂因素。研究设计:这是一项对单胎阴道分娩妇女的回顾性病例对照研究的二次分析。我们的主要分析是评估硬膜外镇痛和OASIs之间的关系,调整可改变和不可改变的危险因素。对这些危险因素进行了效应修正和混杂效应的评估。结果:我们的样本包括1326名阴道分娩的妇女。在有OASIs的女性中,有218名(75.4%)使用了硬膜外麻醉,而在没有OASIs的女性中,有620名(59.8%)使用了硬膜外麻醉(P < 0.001)。硬膜外镇痛使OASIs的发生率增加107%(优势比2.07,95%可信区间[1.54 ~ 2.77])。通过进一步研究OASIs与硬膜外膜之间的关系,同时考虑多种危险因素,解决多重共线性、效应修正和混杂因素,我们确定手术分娩和引产是混杂变量。考虑到这些因素,减轻了硬膜外使用与OASIs之间的关联(调整优势比为1.38,95%可信区间[1.00至1.91])。结论:最初,我们发现硬膜外镇痛与OASIs相关;然而,在进行了额外的统计分析并考虑了额外的风险因素后,这种关联不再具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信