Epidural Analgesia and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Do Hee Lee, Celia Kucera, Melissa Salinas, Charelle M Carter-Brooks
{"title":"Epidural Analgesia and the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.","authors":"Do Hee Lee, Celia Kucera, Melissa Salinas, Charelle M Carter-Brooks","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There are conflicting data regarding the association between epidural analgesia and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). There are also few predictive models that document assessment for multicollinearity among risk factors or precisely identify effect modifiers and confounders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, using rigorous statistical methods to identify effect modifiers and confounders in a diverse, urban population.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective case-control study of women with singleton vaginal deliveries. Our primary analysis was to assess the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, adjusting for modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. These risk factors were additionally assessed for effect modification and confounding effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sample consisted of 1,326 women who had a vaginal delivery. Among the women with OASIs, 218 women (75.4%) had an epidural, and among those without OASIs, 620 women (59.8%) had an epidural (P < 0.001). Epidural analgesia increased the odds of OASIs by 107% (odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval [1.54 to 2.77]). Through further examination of the relationship between OASIs and epidurals, while considering multiple risk factors and addressing multicollinearity, effect modification, and confounding, we identified operative delivery and labor induction as confounding variables. Accounting for these factors mitigated the association between epidural use and OASIs (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval [1.00 to 1.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initially, we found epidural analgesia to be associated with OASIs; however, after performing additional statistical analysis and accounting for additional risk factors, this association was no longer statistically significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There are conflicting data regarding the association between epidural analgesia and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). There are also few predictive models that document assessment for multicollinearity among risk factors or precisely identify effect modifiers and confounders.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, using rigorous statistical methods to identify effect modifiers and confounders in a diverse, urban population.

Study design: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective case-control study of women with singleton vaginal deliveries. Our primary analysis was to assess the association between epidural analgesia and OASIs, adjusting for modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. These risk factors were additionally assessed for effect modification and confounding effect.

Results: Our sample consisted of 1,326 women who had a vaginal delivery. Among the women with OASIs, 218 women (75.4%) had an epidural, and among those without OASIs, 620 women (59.8%) had an epidural (P < 0.001). Epidural analgesia increased the odds of OASIs by 107% (odds ratio 2.07, 95% confidence interval [1.54 to 2.77]). Through further examination of the relationship between OASIs and epidurals, while considering multiple risk factors and addressing multicollinearity, effect modification, and confounding, we identified operative delivery and labor induction as confounding variables. Accounting for these factors mitigated the association between epidural use and OASIs (adjusted odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval [1.00 to 1.91]).

Conclusions: Initially, we found epidural analgesia to be associated with OASIs; however, after performing additional statistical analysis and accounting for additional risk factors, this association was no longer statistically significant.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信