Smartphone Application for Spastic Ataxias Cross-Sectional Validation of a Newly Developed Smartphone App for Remote Monitoring in Spastic Ataxias.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ilse H J Willemse, Sabato Mellone, Carlo Tacconi, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Matthis Synofzik, Jorik H Nonnekes, Bart P C van de Warrenburg
{"title":"Smartphone Application for Spastic Ataxias Cross-Sectional Validation of a Newly Developed Smartphone App for Remote Monitoring in Spastic Ataxias.","authors":"Ilse H J Willemse, Sabato Mellone, Carlo Tacconi, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Matthis Synofzik, Jorik H Nonnekes, Bart P C van de Warrenburg","doi":"10.1007/s12311-025-01820-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective trial-planning in Spastic ataxias (SPAX) is impeded by the absence of validated outcome measures for detecting longitudinal changes. Digital outcome measures show promise, demonstrating sensitivity to disease severity changes in ataxia and strong correlations with clinical scales. The objective of this study was to develop a smartphone application for SPAX (SPAX-app) to obtain valid digital outcome measures for use in clinical trials. The app contains four tasks assessing gait, standing balance (stance), and finger and hand movements. We carried out a validation study in 22 SPAX patients and 10 controls. Subjects performed the tasks three times during one visit. In parallel, we performed Ambulatory Parkinson's Disease Monitoring (APDM) sensor recordings, Q-motor upper limb assessment, and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Significant correlations were found between the SPAX-app and APDM or Q-motor for step time (r = 0.91), all measures of stance (r = 0.51-0.87) and duration of hand alternation (r = 0.64). No significant correlations were found for variability measures (e.g. standard deviation of step time). All tasks of the SPAX-app, except for stance, can discriminate SPAX from controls and show moderate to high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.67-0.97). Significant correlations were found between SARA and step time (r = 0.70), inter-onset interval in finger tapping (r = 0.57), and duration of hand alternation (r = 0.65). The stance task did not show significant correlations with SARA. With the SPAX-app, we present a set of digital outcome measures for potential use in clinical trials. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether these measures can track disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":50706,"journal":{"name":"Cerebellum","volume":"24 3","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebellum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-025-01820-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective trial-planning in Spastic ataxias (SPAX) is impeded by the absence of validated outcome measures for detecting longitudinal changes. Digital outcome measures show promise, demonstrating sensitivity to disease severity changes in ataxia and strong correlations with clinical scales. The objective of this study was to develop a smartphone application for SPAX (SPAX-app) to obtain valid digital outcome measures for use in clinical trials. The app contains four tasks assessing gait, standing balance (stance), and finger and hand movements. We carried out a validation study in 22 SPAX patients and 10 controls. Subjects performed the tasks three times during one visit. In parallel, we performed Ambulatory Parkinson's Disease Monitoring (APDM) sensor recordings, Q-motor upper limb assessment, and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Significant correlations were found between the SPAX-app and APDM or Q-motor for step time (r = 0.91), all measures of stance (r = 0.51-0.87) and duration of hand alternation (r = 0.64). No significant correlations were found for variability measures (e.g. standard deviation of step time). All tasks of the SPAX-app, except for stance, can discriminate SPAX from controls and show moderate to high test-retest reliability (ICC 0.67-0.97). Significant correlations were found between SARA and step time (r = 0.70), inter-onset interval in finger tapping (r = 0.57), and duration of hand alternation (r = 0.65). The stance task did not show significant correlations with SARA. With the SPAX-app, we present a set of digital outcome measures for potential use in clinical trials. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether these measures can track disease progression.

痉挛性共济失调(SPAX)的有效试验规划因缺乏用于检测纵向变化的有效结果测量而受到阻碍。数字结果测量法显示出了前景,它对共济失调的疾病严重程度变化非常敏感,并且与临床量表有很强的相关性。本研究的目的是为 SPAX 开发一款智能手机应用程序(SPAX-app),以获得有效的数字结果测量,用于临床试验。该应用程序包含四项任务,分别评估步态、站立平衡(站姿)、手指和手部运动。我们对 22 名 SPAX 患者和 10 名对照组进行了验证研究。受试者在一次就诊中完成了三次任务。与此同时,我们还进行了非卧床帕金森病监测(APDM)传感器记录、Q-运动上肢评估以及共济失调评估和评级量表(SARA)。SPAX-app 与 APDM 或 Q-motor 在步长(r = 0.91)、所有站姿测量(r = 0.51-0.87)和手部交替持续时间(r = 0.64)方面存在显著相关性。变异性测量(如步长标准偏差)没有发现明显的相关性。除站立外,SPAX 应用程序的所有任务都能区分 SPAX 和对照组,并显示出中等至较高的测试重复可靠性(ICC 0.67-0.97)。SARA 与步幅时间(r = 0.70)、手指敲击间歇(r = 0.57)和手部交替持续时间(r = 0.65)之间存在显著相关性。站立任务与 SARA 没有明显的相关性。通过 SPAX 应用程序,我们提出了一套可用于临床试验的数字结果测量方法。我们还需要进行纵向研究,以评估这些指标是否能跟踪疾病的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebellum
Cerebellum 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Official publication of the Society for Research on the Cerebellum devoted to genetics of cerebellar ataxias, role of cerebellum in motor control and cognitive function, and amid an ageing population, diseases associated with cerebellar dysfunction. The Cerebellum is a central source for the latest developments in fundamental neurosciences including molecular and cellular biology; behavioural neurosciences and neurochemistry; genetics; fundamental and clinical neurophysiology; neurology and neuropathology; cognition and neuroimaging. The Cerebellum benefits neuroscientists in molecular and cellular biology; neurophysiologists; researchers in neurotransmission; neurologists; radiologists; paediatricians; neuropsychologists; students of neurology and psychiatry and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信