Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture Depends on Surgeon Subspecialty Training.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Matthew T Kingery, Bradley A Lezak, Charles C Lin, Utkarsh Anil, Joseph Bosco
{"title":"Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture Depends on Surgeon Subspecialty Training.","authors":"Matthew T Kingery, Bradley A Lezak, Charles C Lin, Utkarsh Anil, Joseph Bosco","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Femoral neck fractures pose a notable health challenge globally, with a projected rise in cases due to aging populations. While treatment protocols are established, the effect of surgeon training on treatment decisions, particularly trauma versus arthroplasty fellowship training, remains less clear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, using data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System in New York State, examined 26,761 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Among 951 treating surgeons, 20.6% had no subspecialty fellowship training while 4.6% had training in multiple subspecialties, with arthroplasty (232 surgeons, 24.4%), sports (230 surgeons, 24.2%), and trauma (93 surgeons, 9.8%) being the most common.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed notable differences in surgical treatments based on subspecialty, with trauma surgeons favoring fixation and arthroplasty surgeons favoring total hip arthroplasty (THA). Even after adjusting for covariates, patients treated by arthroplasty-trained surgeons were more likely to receive THA. In addition, there was consistency between trauma and arthroplasty surgeons in treating lower functional demand patients with hemiarthroplasty. While trauma surgeons performed more fixations and arthroplasty surgeons more THAs, baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes between fixation and THA patients were similar, indicating comparable baseline health despite treatment differences. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that treatment by an arthroplasty surgeon markedly increased the odds of receiving THA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the complexity added by surgeon subspecialty in femoral neck fracture management and emphasizes the importance of recognizing how surgeon-specific factors influence treatment decisions. Understanding these nuances can inform training optimization and promote collaborative approaches within the orthopaedic community, ultimately contributing to enhanced patient outcomes as femoral neck fracture management evolves.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Femoral neck fractures pose a notable health challenge globally, with a projected rise in cases due to aging populations. While treatment protocols are established, the effect of surgeon training on treatment decisions, particularly trauma versus arthroplasty fellowship training, remains less clear.

Methods: This study, using data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System in New York State, examined 26,761 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Among 951 treating surgeons, 20.6% had no subspecialty fellowship training while 4.6% had training in multiple subspecialties, with arthroplasty (232 surgeons, 24.4%), sports (230 surgeons, 24.2%), and trauma (93 surgeons, 9.8%) being the most common.

Results: Analysis revealed notable differences in surgical treatments based on subspecialty, with trauma surgeons favoring fixation and arthroplasty surgeons favoring total hip arthroplasty (THA). Even after adjusting for covariates, patients treated by arthroplasty-trained surgeons were more likely to receive THA. In addition, there was consistency between trauma and arthroplasty surgeons in treating lower functional demand patients with hemiarthroplasty. While trauma surgeons performed more fixations and arthroplasty surgeons more THAs, baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes between fixation and THA patients were similar, indicating comparable baseline health despite treatment differences. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that treatment by an arthroplasty surgeon markedly increased the odds of receiving THA.

Conclusion: This study underscores the complexity added by surgeon subspecialty in femoral neck fracture management and emphasizes the importance of recognizing how surgeon-specific factors influence treatment decisions. Understanding these nuances can inform training optimization and promote collaborative approaches within the orthopaedic community, ultimately contributing to enhanced patient outcomes as femoral neck fracture management evolves.

股骨颈骨折的治疗依赖于外科医生的专科训练。
背景:股骨颈骨折在全球范围内是一个值得注意的健康挑战,由于人口老龄化,预计病例会增加。虽然治疗方案已经建立,但外科医生培训对治疗决策的影响,特别是创伤与关节置换的培训,仍然不太清楚。方法:本研究使用纽约州全州规划和研究合作系统的数据,检查了26,761例符合纳入标准的患者。在951名治疗外科医生中,20.6%没有接受过亚专科奖学金培训,4.6%接受过多亚专科培训,其中最常见的是关节成形术(232名,24.4%)、运动(230名,24.2%)和创伤(93名,9.8%)。结果:分析显示基于亚专科的手术治疗有显著差异,创伤外科医生倾向于固定,而关节置换外科医生倾向于全髋关节置换术(THA)。即使在调整协变量后,接受过关节置换术训练的外科医生治疗的患者更有可能接受THA。此外,创伤外科医生和关节置换外科医生在治疗半关节置换术患者的低功能需求方面也存在一致性。虽然创伤外科医生进行更多的固定手术,关节置换术医生进行更多的THA手术,但固定和THA患者的基线特征和围手术期结果相似,表明尽管治疗差异,但基线健康状况相当。多变量logistic回归证实,关节置换外科医生的治疗显著增加了接受THA的几率。结论:本研究强调了外科专科在股骨颈骨折治疗中增加的复杂性,并强调了认识到外科专科因素如何影响治疗决策的重要性。了解这些细微差别可以为培训优化提供信息,并促进骨科社区的协作方法,最终随着股骨颈骨折治疗的发展,有助于提高患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信