Risk Factors of Diaphyseal Femoral Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Tyler K Williamson, Jonathan G Eastman, Timothy Achor, Stephen J Warner
{"title":"Risk Factors of Diaphyseal Femoral Nonunions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Tyler K Williamson, Jonathan G Eastman, Timothy Achor, Stephen J Warner","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures often results in reliable union, with union rates ranging from 96% to 100%. However, femoral nonunions (FNUs) can be a debilitating clinical condition for patients. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the predictors of nonunion after femoral midshaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using key terms \"femoral shaft non-union,\" \"femoral diaphyseal non-union,\" \"femoral shaft fracture,\" \"femoral diaphysis fracture,\" and \"femoral midshaft fracture\" published before June 2024. Human studies describing risk factors associated with development of FNUs were included. Articles were excluded if not able to assess risk factors of FNUs. Data synthesis summarized outcome measures and study designs appropriately in the results. SPSS meta-analysis function was used to calculate the mean effect size estimate (MESE) and 95% confidence intervals for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This search yielded a total of 7,879 studies, and after exclusion criteria were assessed, 26 articles comprising 14,170 patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures were included. These studies included 973 fractures developing nonunions after surgical intervention. A total of 25 factors were assessed. Age (MESE = 1.33 [0.92 to 1.74]; P < 0.001) and type 2 diabetes (MESE = 1.77 [1.03 to 2.52]; P < 0.001) were significant patient-specific risk factors. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 32B (MESE = 0.94 [0.35 to 1.53]; P < 0.001) and Winquist-Hansen type 3 (MESE = 1.45 [0.63 to 2.26]; P < 0.001) were significant injury-specific factors, along with butterfly fragment size and displacement and open fractures. Open reduction (MESE = 0.80 [0.30 to 1.30]; P < 0.001) and postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (MESE = 1.17 [0.08 to 2.27]; P = 0.04) were significant surgical-specific and management-specific risk factors, along with external fixation and iatrogenic comminution.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Age, diabetes, fracture classification grading, and postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use were among the factors placing patients at the highest risk of femoral diaphyseal nonunions, including other patient-specific, injury-specific, surgical, and management factors. Future studies are warranted to use a prospective study design, identify diaphyseal nonunion-specific risk factors, and implement evidence-based prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures often results in reliable union, with union rates ranging from 96% to 100%. However, femoral nonunions (FNUs) can be a debilitating clinical condition for patients. The purpose of this review was to identify and characterize the predictors of nonunion after femoral midshaft fractures.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using key terms "femoral shaft non-union," "femoral diaphyseal non-union," "femoral shaft fracture," "femoral diaphysis fracture," and "femoral midshaft fracture" published before June 2024. Human studies describing risk factors associated with development of FNUs were included. Articles were excluded if not able to assess risk factors of FNUs. Data synthesis summarized outcome measures and study designs appropriately in the results. SPSS meta-analysis function was used to calculate the mean effect size estimate (MESE) and 95% confidence intervals for each outcome.

Results: This search yielded a total of 7,879 studies, and after exclusion criteria were assessed, 26 articles comprising 14,170 patients with diaphyseal femoral fractures were included. These studies included 973 fractures developing nonunions after surgical intervention. A total of 25 factors were assessed. Age (MESE = 1.33 [0.92 to 1.74]; P < 0.001) and type 2 diabetes (MESE = 1.77 [1.03 to 2.52]; P < 0.001) were significant patient-specific risk factors. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 32B (MESE = 0.94 [0.35 to 1.53]; P < 0.001) and Winquist-Hansen type 3 (MESE = 1.45 [0.63 to 2.26]; P < 0.001) were significant injury-specific factors, along with butterfly fragment size and displacement and open fractures. Open reduction (MESE = 0.80 [0.30 to 1.30]; P < 0.001) and postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use (MESE = 1.17 [0.08 to 2.27]; P = 0.04) were significant surgical-specific and management-specific risk factors, along with external fixation and iatrogenic comminution.

Discussion: Age, diabetes, fracture classification grading, and postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use were among the factors placing patients at the highest risk of femoral diaphyseal nonunions, including other patient-specific, injury-specific, surgical, and management factors. Future studies are warranted to use a prospective study design, identify diaphyseal nonunion-specific risk factors, and implement evidence-based prevention strategies.

Level of evidence: III.

股骨骺端骨不连的风险因素:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:髓内钉治疗股骨骨干骨折可获得可靠的愈合,愈合率为96%至100%。然而,股骨骨不连(FNUs)对患者来说是一种使人衰弱的临床状况。本综述的目的是确定和描述股骨中轴骨折后骨不连的预测因素。方法:系统检索2024年6月前发表的关键词“股骨干骨不连”、“股骨干骨不连”、“股骨干骨折”、“股骨干骨折”、“股中轴骨折”。包括描述与FNUs发展相关的危险因素的人类研究。不能评估FNUs危险因素的文章被排除。数据综合在结果中适当地总结了结局测量和研究设计。使用SPSS meta分析函数计算每个结果的平均效应大小估计(mean effect size estimate, MESE)和95%置信区间。结果:本次检索共获得7879项研究,在评估排除标准后,纳入26篇文献,14170例股骨骨干骨折患者。这些研究包括973例手术干预后出现骨不连的骨折。共评估了25个因素。年龄(MESE = 1.33 [0.92 ~ 1.74];P < 0.001)和2型糖尿病(MESE = 1.77 [1.03 ~ 2.52];P < 0.001)是显著的患者特异性危险因素。Arbeitsgemeinschaft osteosynthesis efragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 32B (MESE = 0.94 [0.35 ~ 1.53];P < 0.001)和Winquist-Hansen 3型(MESE = 1.45 [0.63 ~ 2.26];P < 0.001)是显著的损伤特异性因素,以及蝴蝶碎片大小、移位和开放性骨折。切开复位(entropy = 0.80 [0.30 ~ 1.30];P < 0.001)和术后非甾体类抗炎药的使用(MESE = 1.17 [0.08 ~ 2.27];P = 0.04)是手术特异性和管理特异性的显著危险因素,以及外固定和医源性粉碎。讨论:年龄、糖尿病、骨折分类分级和术后非甾体类抗炎药的使用是使患者股骨骨干骨不连风险最高的因素,包括其他患者特异性、损伤特异性、手术和治疗因素。未来的研究应采用前瞻性研究设计,确定骨干骨不连特异性危险因素,并实施循证预防策略。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信