Feasibility and Acceptability of the "About Me" Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Stuart W Grande, Mikele Epperly, Karynn Yee-Huey Tan, Supriya Yagnik, Michael Ellenbogen, Jane Pederson, Alberto Villarejo-Galende, Rae Lynn Ziegler, Greg Kotzbauer
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of the \"About Me\" Care Card as a Tool for Engaging Older Adults in Conversations About Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Stuart W Grande, Mikele Epperly, Karynn Yee-Huey Tan, Supriya Yagnik, Michael Ellenbogen, Jane Pederson, Alberto Villarejo-Galende, Rae Lynn Ziegler, Greg Kotzbauer","doi":"10.1370/afm.240165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to address fears and lived experiences of cognitive decline among adults via whole-person conversations that elicit problems and goals that matter most to patients. Currently, 6.7 million Americans have Alzheimer disease or related dementias, with an additional 28 million people reporting subjective cognitive decline-a possible indicator of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. A review of tools for older adults with cognitive impairment showed strong clinical specificity, with insufficient whole-person support for patients. We developed and tested the feasibility and acceptability of a tool to enhance conversations for adults with cognitive impairment at the point of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a feasibility study to build a conversation tool, guided by principles of shared decision making, called the \"About Me\" Care Card. Informed by an environmental scan, we created and pilot-tested prototypes at implementation sites. All phases were overseen by a multidisciplinary steering committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen diverse clinicians consisting of 7 clinician types across 7 institutions piloted the card during in-person visits or by telephone. Observations showed that the card (1) allowed time to elicit what matters most to patients, (2) created space for personalized care conversations, (3) opened an examination of social care needs, and (4) moderated emotional relationships between families and individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A community-based codesign process led to a feasible tool for primary care teams to facilitate whole-person conversations with aging adults. The About Me Care Card appeared to broaden conversations compared with routine care. More work is needed to determine scalability and effects on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"23 2","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to address fears and lived experiences of cognitive decline among adults via whole-person conversations that elicit problems and goals that matter most to patients. Currently, 6.7 million Americans have Alzheimer disease or related dementias, with an additional 28 million people reporting subjective cognitive decline-a possible indicator of Alzheimer disease and related dementias. A review of tools for older adults with cognitive impairment showed strong clinical specificity, with insufficient whole-person support for patients. We developed and tested the feasibility and acceptability of a tool to enhance conversations for adults with cognitive impairment at the point of care.

Methods: We conducted a feasibility study to build a conversation tool, guided by principles of shared decision making, called the "About Me" Care Card. Informed by an environmental scan, we created and pilot-tested prototypes at implementation sites. All phases were overseen by a multidisciplinary steering committee.

Results: Fourteen diverse clinicians consisting of 7 clinician types across 7 institutions piloted the card during in-person visits or by telephone. Observations showed that the card (1) allowed time to elicit what matters most to patients, (2) created space for personalized care conversations, (3) opened an examination of social care needs, and (4) moderated emotional relationships between families and individuals.

Conclusion: A community-based codesign process led to a feasible tool for primary care teams to facilitate whole-person conversations with aging adults. The About Me Care Card appeared to broaden conversations compared with routine care. More work is needed to determine scalability and effects on outcomes.

目的:我们的目标是通过全人对话,了解患者最关心的问题和目标,从而解决成年人对认知能力下降的恐惧和生活体验。目前,有 670 万美国人患有阿尔茨海默病或相关痴呆症,另有 2800 万人报告主观认知能力下降--这是阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的可能指标。一项针对认知障碍老年人的工具审查显示,这些工具具有很强的临床特异性,但对患者的全人支持不足。我们开发并测试了一种工具的可行性和可接受性,以便在护理点加强与认知障碍成人的对话:我们进行了一项可行性研究,以共同决策原则为指导,开发了一种名为 "关于我 "护理卡的对话工具。在环境扫描的基础上,我们创建了原型并在实施地点进行了试点测试。所有阶段均由多学科指导委员会监督:结果:由 7 家机构的 7 种临床医生组成的 14 位不同临床医生通过亲自访问或电话试用了护理卡。观察结果表明,该卡(1)有时间了解患者最关心的问题;(2)为个性化护理对话创造了空间;(3)开启了对社会护理需求的检查;(4)缓和了家庭与个人之间的情感关系:以社区为基础的编码设计过程为初级保健团队提供了一个可行的工具,以促进与老年人的全人对话。与常规护理相比,"关于我的护理卡 "似乎扩大了对话范围。还需要做更多的工作来确定其可扩展性和对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信