Family Medicine's Role in Generating Evidence to Inform Primary Care Payment Reform and New Care Delivery Models.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Helen Newton, Margaret Helton, Erin Fraher
{"title":"Family Medicine's Role in Generating Evidence to Inform Primary Care Payment Reform and New Care Delivery Models.","authors":"Helen Newton, Margaret Helton, Erin Fraher","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240009R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that half of physician office visits are for primary care and family physicians make up 40% of all primary care clinicians in the US, family medicine researchers can play a key role in evaluating and reporting on state and federal innovations to redesign primary care payment and care delivery. We used Dimensions, a comprehensive publications and citations research platform, to measure the impact of family medicine-affiliated scholarship (research articles, letters to the editor, research letters, and editorials) published from 2018 to 2022 in 14 of the highest-impact journals that routinely publish articles on payment and delivery system reform. Among 6212 peer-reviewed articles related to primary care payment and delivery system reform, we found that 519 (8.4%) included at least 1 author with an affiliation with a department of family medicine compared with 1197 articles (19.3%) that had at least 1 author with an affiliation with a department of internal medicine and 504 articles (8.1%) that had at least 1 author affiliated with a department of pediatrics. Taken together, these findings suggest that academic departments of family medicine are lagging in scholarly contributions that evaluate payment and delivery system reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 Supplement2","pages":"S164-S172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240009R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that half of physician office visits are for primary care and family physicians make up 40% of all primary care clinicians in the US, family medicine researchers can play a key role in evaluating and reporting on state and federal innovations to redesign primary care payment and care delivery. We used Dimensions, a comprehensive publications and citations research platform, to measure the impact of family medicine-affiliated scholarship (research articles, letters to the editor, research letters, and editorials) published from 2018 to 2022 in 14 of the highest-impact journals that routinely publish articles on payment and delivery system reform. Among 6212 peer-reviewed articles related to primary care payment and delivery system reform, we found that 519 (8.4%) included at least 1 author with an affiliation with a department of family medicine compared with 1197 articles (19.3%) that had at least 1 author with an affiliation with a department of internal medicine and 504 articles (8.1%) that had at least 1 author affiliated with a department of pediatrics. Taken together, these findings suggest that academic departments of family medicine are lagging in scholarly contributions that evaluate payment and delivery system reform.

家庭医学在为初级保健支付改革和新的医疗服务模式提供证据方面的作用。
鉴于一半的医生门诊是初级医疗,而家庭医生占美国所有初级医疗临床医生的 40%,家庭医学研究人员可以在评估和报告州和联邦重新设计初级医疗支付和医疗服务的创新方面发挥关键作用。我们利用综合出版物和引文研究平台 Dimensions,衡量了 2018 年至 2022 年期间在 14 种影响力最大的期刊上发表的与全科医学相关的学术文章(研究文章、致编辑信、研究信和社论)的影响力,这些期刊经常发表有关支付和提供系统改革的文章。我们发现,在 6212 篇与初级医疗支付和服务体系改革相关的同行评审文章中,有 519 篇(8.4%)文章的至少一名作者隶属于全科医学系,相比之下,有 1197 篇文章(19.3%)的至少一名作者隶属于内科医学系,有 504 篇文章(8.1%)的至少一名作者隶属于儿科医学系。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,全科医学学术部门在评估支付和服务系统改革方面的学术贡献滞后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信