Effectiveness of continuous and pulse mode of ultrasound therapy in temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia-a randomized controlled study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.22514/jofph.2025.007
Bhawna Saini, Ambika Gupta, Harneet Singh, Suman Bisla, Suriya Nagarajan, Komal Kumia
{"title":"Effectiveness of continuous and pulse mode of ultrasound therapy in temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia-a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Bhawna Saini, Ambika Gupta, Harneet Singh, Suman Bisla, Suriya Nagarajan, Komal Kumia","doi":"10.22514/jofph.2025.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia (TMD-M) is one of the most common patient complaints in clinics. Because of the disease's multifactorial etiology and complexity,extensive understanding is required to determine an appropriate treatment protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current randomized comparison study included 80 patients who presented to the outpatient department with a TMD-M complaint. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: continuous therapeutic ultrasound or pulsed therapeutic ultrasound, according to a standard protocol. The key outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analog scale (VAS), 0-10 cm) and muscle pressure pain threshold (PPT). Secondary outcome assessments included changes in maximal mouth opening, functional movements, and depression (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)). A descriptive analysis was performed on the dataset to get data estimates for all variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The means of the differences in the two group's values were compared. Intergroup comparisons for normally distributed data were performed using independent sample <i>t</i>-tests, and intragroup comparisons using repeated-measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA). For non-normally distributed data, such as pressure pain sensitivity (PPT), BDI, left laterotrusive movement (LLT), and protrusive movement (PM), intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test, and intragroup comparisons using the Friedman test followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Although the intragroup changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, PPT, BDI, LLT and PM were highly significant in both groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), there was no significant intergroup difference in pain reduction, PPT, BDI, LLT or PM (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There were no significant intergroup or intragroup differences in mouth opening or right lateral movement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the pulse and continuous modes of therapeutic ultrasound (US) are equally effective in relieving pain. US therapy in both modes is a potent and independent therapeutic modality for the treatment of TMD-M.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05211245.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"39 1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jofph.2025.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia (TMD-M) is one of the most common patient complaints in clinics. Because of the disease's multifactorial etiology and complexity,extensive understanding is required to determine an appropriate treatment protocol.

Methods: The current randomized comparison study included 80 patients who presented to the outpatient department with a TMD-M complaint. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: continuous therapeutic ultrasound or pulsed therapeutic ultrasound, according to a standard protocol. The key outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analog scale (VAS), 0-10 cm) and muscle pressure pain threshold (PPT). Secondary outcome assessments included changes in maximal mouth opening, functional movements, and depression (Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)). A descriptive analysis was performed on the dataset to get data estimates for all variables.

Results: The means of the differences in the two group's values were compared. Intergroup comparisons for normally distributed data were performed using independent sample t-tests, and intragroup comparisons using repeated-measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA). For non-normally distributed data, such as pressure pain sensitivity (PPT), BDI, left laterotrusive movement (LLT), and protrusive movement (PM), intergroup comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test, and intragroup comparisons using the Friedman test followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Although the intragroup changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) score, PPT, BDI, LLT and PM were highly significant in both groups (p < 0.001), there was no significant intergroup difference in pain reduction, PPT, BDI, LLT or PM (p > 0.05). There were no significant intergroup or intragroup differences in mouth opening or right lateral movement.

Conclusions: Both the pulse and continuous modes of therapeutic ultrasound (US) are equally effective in relieving pain. US therapy in both modes is a potent and independent therapeutic modality for the treatment of TMD-M.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05211245.

连续型和脉冲型超声治疗颞下颌紊乱相关肌痛的疗效——随机对照研究。
背景:颞下颌紊乱相关肌痛(TMD-M)是临床上最常见的患者主诉之一。由于该病的多因素病因和复杂性,需要广泛的了解才能确定适当的治疗方案。方法:目前的随机比较研究包括80例以TMD-M主诉就诊的患者。根据标准方案,患者被随机分配到两组:连续治疗性超声或脉冲治疗性超声。主要结局指标为疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表,VAS, 0-10 cm)和肌压痛阈值(PPT)。次要结果评估包括最大开口、功能运动和抑郁的变化(贝克抑郁量表(BDI))。对数据集进行描述性分析,以获得所有变量的数据估计。结果:比较两组数值差异的均值。正态分布数据的组间比较采用独立样本t检验,组内比较采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。对于非正态分布的数据,如压痛敏感性(PPT)、BDI、左外突运动(LLT)和前突运动(PM),采用Mann-Whitney检验进行组间比较,采用Friedman检验进行组内比较,然后采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。两组患者视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、PPT、BDI、LLT、PM组内差异均极显著(p < 0.001),但疼痛减轻、PPT、BDI、LLT、PM组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。各组间、组内张口、右侧运动无明显差异。结论:脉冲式和连续式超声治疗对疼痛的缓解效果相同。两种模式的联合治疗是治疗TMD-M的有效和独立的治疗方式。临床试验注册:NCT05211245。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信