Temporomandibular disorder confounders in motor vehicle accident patients.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.22514/jofph.2025.014
Xiang Li, Vandana Singh, Camila Pacheco-Pereira, Reid Friesen
{"title":"Temporomandibular disorder confounders in motor vehicle accident patients.","authors":"Xiang Li, Vandana Singh, Camila Pacheco-Pereira, Reid Friesen","doi":"10.22514/jofph.2025.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) are associated with the onset of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms. However, diagnosing TMD-related pain is challenging due to various entities that can refer pain to the region. This study aims to identify prevalent radiographic confounders to pain diagnosis in MVA patients who were subsequently referred for temporomandibular joint imaging using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by comparing these patients to a cohort of patients without MVA history.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CBCTs of 738 temporomandibular joints were reviewed, with cases stratified by MVA history. This research explored the demographics and calculated the prevalence of radiographic confounders (RC) in each category, comparing the findings for both groups. The chi-square test was used to assess statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the MVA cohort (n = 151, mean age = 41.3 years, S.D (Standard Deviation) = 13.3 years) averaged 1.10 confounders/patient compared to a significantly lower 0.68 confounders/patient in the non-MVA cohort (n = 218, mean age = 33.6 years, S.D = 18.2 years). The most frequently identified RCs include sinus pathologies (39.1% (MVA) <i>vs.</i> 28.0% (non-MVA), <i>p</i> = 0.025) and endodontic lesions (22.5% (MVA) <i>vs.</i>10.1% (non-MVA), <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians must be vigilant about confounders when managing patients suspected of TMD. We recommend patients undergo a complete dental evaluation before being referred to a specialist to avoid unnecessary medical costs and treatment delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":48800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","volume":"39 1","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jofph.2025.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) are associated with the onset of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms. However, diagnosing TMD-related pain is challenging due to various entities that can refer pain to the region. This study aims to identify prevalent radiographic confounders to pain diagnosis in MVA patients who were subsequently referred for temporomandibular joint imaging using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by comparing these patients to a cohort of patients without MVA history.

Methods: CBCTs of 738 temporomandibular joints were reviewed, with cases stratified by MVA history. This research explored the demographics and calculated the prevalence of radiographic confounders (RC) in each category, comparing the findings for both groups. The chi-square test was used to assess statistical significance.

Results: Patients in the MVA cohort (n = 151, mean age = 41.3 years, S.D (Standard Deviation) = 13.3 years) averaged 1.10 confounders/patient compared to a significantly lower 0.68 confounders/patient in the non-MVA cohort (n = 218, mean age = 33.6 years, S.D = 18.2 years). The most frequently identified RCs include sinus pathologies (39.1% (MVA) vs. 28.0% (non-MVA), p = 0.025) and endodontic lesions (22.5% (MVA) vs.10.1% (non-MVA), p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Clinicians must be vigilant about confounders when managing patients suspected of TMD. We recommend patients undergo a complete dental evaluation before being referred to a specialist to avoid unnecessary medical costs and treatment delays.

背景:机动车事故(MVA)与颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)症状的出现有关。然而,由于多种因素会导致该区域出现疼痛,因此诊断与 TMD 相关的疼痛具有挑战性。本研究旨在通过将随后转诊使用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行颞下颌关节成像的 MVA 患者与无 MVA 病史的患者进行比较,找出这些患者在疼痛诊断方面普遍存在的放射学混杂因素:方法: 对 738 例颞下颌关节的 CBCT 进行了审查,并根据 MVA 病史对病例进行了分层。这项研究探讨了人口统计学特征,并计算了每个类别中放射学混杂因素(RC)的发生率,比较了两组的研究结果。采用卡方检验评估统计学意义:MVA队列中的患者(n = 151,平均年龄 = 41.3岁,S.D(标准偏差)= 13.3岁)平均每名患者有1.10个混杂因素,而非MVA队列中的患者(n = 218,平均年龄 = 33.6岁,S.D = 18.2岁)平均每名患者有0.68个混杂因素,明显低于后者。最常见的混杂因素包括鼻窦病变(39.1%(MVA)vs 28.0%(非MVA),p = 0.025)和牙髓病变(22.5%(MVA)vs 10.1%(非MVA),p = 0.001):临床医生在管理疑似 TMD 患者时必须对混杂因素保持警惕。我们建议患者在转诊至专科医生前进行全面的牙科评估,以避免不必要的医疗费用和治疗延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Founded upon sound scientific principles, this journal continues to make important contributions that strongly influence the work of dental and medical professionals involved in treating oral and facial pain, including temporomandibular disorders, and headache. In addition to providing timely scientific research and clinical articles, the journal presents diagnostic techniques and treatment therapies for oral and facial pain, headache, mandibular dysfunction, and occlusion and covers pharmacology, physical therapy, surgery, and other pain-management methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信