Immunosuppressant withdrawal versus glucocorticoid withdrawal in systemic lupus erythematosus: 2-year outcomes of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Aishwarya Gopal, Chengappa Kavadichanda, Christina Mary Mariaselvam, K T Harichandrakumar, Molly Mary Thabah, Vir Singh Negi
{"title":"Immunosuppressant withdrawal versus glucocorticoid withdrawal in systemic lupus erythematosus: 2-year outcomes of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Aishwarya Gopal, Chengappa Kavadichanda, Christina Mary Mariaselvam, K T Harichandrakumar, Molly Mary Thabah, Vir Singh Negi","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to test whether immunosuppressant (IS) withdrawal is noninferior to glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in remission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label, single-center, randomized (1:1) controlled trial, we compared flare occurrence in stable SLE patients undergoing GC or IS tapering. Patients aged >18, on stable GC (prednisolone ≤7.5 mg/day) and maintenance non-biological IS for ≥3 years, in clinical remission for ≥1 year, were enrolled and assigned to taper GC or IS over 3 months. The primary end point was the proportion of patients experiencing a flare, defined by the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) at 52 weeks. Patients in remission beyond 52 weeks were followed up to the maximum available follow-up duration beyond 104 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May and December 2021, 121 patients were randomized, and 117 (GC withdrawal, n = 58; IS withdrawal, n = 59) were included in the primary analysis. Flare occurred in 31% of the GC withdrawal group and 20.3% in the IS withdrawal group (risk difference, 10.6%[95% CI, -26.5-5.1]; p= 0.18), demonstrating the noninferiority of IS withdrawal. At maximum follow-up, 44.8% in the GC withdrawal group and 32.2% in the IS withdrawal group experienced a flare (risk difference, -12.6%[95% CI, -30.1-4.9]; p= 0.11), confirming the noninferiority of IS withdrawal at 2 years. Damage accrual was similar between the two groups at both endpoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IS withdrawal is noninferior to GC withdrawal in SLE patients in long-term clinical remission. Personalized tapering strategies based on baseline damage and steroid exposure may optimize outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered with https://ctri.nic.in/, CTRI/2020/07/026712.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to test whether immunosuppressant (IS) withdrawal is noninferior to glucocorticoid (GC) withdrawal in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in remission.

Methods: In this open-label, single-center, randomized (1:1) controlled trial, we compared flare occurrence in stable SLE patients undergoing GC or IS tapering. Patients aged >18, on stable GC (prednisolone ≤7.5 mg/day) and maintenance non-biological IS for ≥3 years, in clinical remission for ≥1 year, were enrolled and assigned to taper GC or IS over 3 months. The primary end point was the proportion of patients experiencing a flare, defined by the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) at 52 weeks. Patients in remission beyond 52 weeks were followed up to the maximum available follow-up duration beyond 104 weeks.

Results: Between May and December 2021, 121 patients were randomized, and 117 (GC withdrawal, n = 58; IS withdrawal, n = 59) were included in the primary analysis. Flare occurred in 31% of the GC withdrawal group and 20.3% in the IS withdrawal group (risk difference, 10.6%[95% CI, -26.5-5.1]; p= 0.18), demonstrating the noninferiority of IS withdrawal. At maximum follow-up, 44.8% in the GC withdrawal group and 32.2% in the IS withdrawal group experienced a flare (risk difference, -12.6%[95% CI, -30.1-4.9]; p= 0.11), confirming the noninferiority of IS withdrawal at 2 years. Damage accrual was similar between the two groups at both endpoints.

Conclusion: IS withdrawal is noninferior to GC withdrawal in SLE patients in long-term clinical remission. Personalized tapering strategies based on baseline damage and steroid exposure may optimize outcomes.

Trial registration: The trial was registered with https://ctri.nic.in/, CTRI/2020/07/026712.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信