Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093
Sabrina Beber, Rita Capasso, Chiara Maffei, Marco Tettamanti, Gabriele Miceli
{"title":"Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.","authors":"Sabrina Beber, Rita Capasso, Chiara Maffei, Marco Tettamanti, Gabriele Miceli","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional neuroimaging studies in neurotypical subjects correlate sentence comprehension to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network. Recent voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) studies of aphasia confirm the link between sentence comprehension and a left posterior region including the angular gyrus, the supra-marginal gyrus and the postero-superior division of the temporal lobe but support left pre-frontal involvement inconsistently. However, these studies focus on thematic role assignment without considering morphosyntactic processes. Hence, available VLSM evidence could provide a partial view of the neurofunctional substrate of sentence comprehension. In the present VLSM study, both morphosyntactic and thematic processes were evaluated systematically and in the same sentence types in each participant, to provide a more detailed picture of the sentence comprehension network. Participants (33 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 90 healthy controls) completed a sentence-picture matching task in which active and passive, declarative reversible sentences were paired with morphosyntactic, thematic and lexical-semantic alternatives. Phonological short-term memory tasks were also administered. Aphasic participants were selected from an initial pool of 70 because they scored below norm on thematic foils (<i>n</i> = 18) or on thematic and morphological foils (<i>n</i> = 15), but within the norm on lexical-semantic foils. The neurofunctional correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic processes were starkly distinguishable. Pre-frontal areas including the inferior and middle frontal gyrus were involved directly in processing local morphosyntactic features and only indirectly in thematic processes. When these areas were damaged, morphosyntactic errors always co-occurred with thematic errors, probably because morphosyntactic damage disrupts the assignment of grammatical roles and ultimately that of thematic roles. Morphosyntactic errors were not influenced by word order canonicity. In contrast, selective thematic role reversals were linked to temporal and parietal damage and were significantly influenced by word order, occurring on passive more than on active sentences. An area including the angular and supra-marginal gyrus was critical for processing non-canonical word order. In sentence comprehension, pre-frontal regions are critical for processing local morphosyntactic features (at least in simple declarative sentences). Temporal and parietal regions are critical for thematic processes. Postero-superior temporal areas are involved in retrieving verb argument structure. Parietal areas are critical for assigning morphosyntactically analysed constituents to the appropriate thematic role, thus serving a crucial function in thematic re-analysis. Each area plays a prevailing but not exclusive role in these processes, interacting with other areas in the network and possibly providing both the language-specific and the domain-general resources needed at various stages of sentence comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 2","pages":"fcaf093"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies in neurotypical subjects correlate sentence comprehension to a left fronto-temporo-parietal network. Recent voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) studies of aphasia confirm the link between sentence comprehension and a left posterior region including the angular gyrus, the supra-marginal gyrus and the postero-superior division of the temporal lobe but support left pre-frontal involvement inconsistently. However, these studies focus on thematic role assignment without considering morphosyntactic processes. Hence, available VLSM evidence could provide a partial view of the neurofunctional substrate of sentence comprehension. In the present VLSM study, both morphosyntactic and thematic processes were evaluated systematically and in the same sentence types in each participant, to provide a more detailed picture of the sentence comprehension network. Participants (33 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 90 healthy controls) completed a sentence-picture matching task in which active and passive, declarative reversible sentences were paired with morphosyntactic, thematic and lexical-semantic alternatives. Phonological short-term memory tasks were also administered. Aphasic participants were selected from an initial pool of 70 because they scored below norm on thematic foils (n = 18) or on thematic and morphological foils (n = 15), but within the norm on lexical-semantic foils. The neurofunctional correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic processes were starkly distinguishable. Pre-frontal areas including the inferior and middle frontal gyrus were involved directly in processing local morphosyntactic features and only indirectly in thematic processes. When these areas were damaged, morphosyntactic errors always co-occurred with thematic errors, probably because morphosyntactic damage disrupts the assignment of grammatical roles and ultimately that of thematic roles. Morphosyntactic errors were not influenced by word order canonicity. In contrast, selective thematic role reversals were linked to temporal and parietal damage and were significantly influenced by word order, occurring on passive more than on active sentences. An area including the angular and supra-marginal gyrus was critical for processing non-canonical word order. In sentence comprehension, pre-frontal regions are critical for processing local morphosyntactic features (at least in simple declarative sentences). Temporal and parietal regions are critical for thematic processes. Postero-superior temporal areas are involved in retrieving verb argument structure. Parietal areas are critical for assigning morphosyntactically analysed constituents to the appropriate thematic role, thus serving a crucial function in thematic re-analysis. Each area plays a prevailing but not exclusive role in these processes, interacting with other areas in the network and possibly providing both the language-specific and the domain-general resources needed at various stages of sentence comprehension.

失语症中形态句法和主题理解过程的不同神经关联。
功能性神经影像学研究发现,典型神经受试者的句子理解与左额-颞-顶叶网络有关。最近基于体素的失语症损伤-症状映射(VLSM)研究证实了句子理解与左后脑区(包括角回、上边缘回和颞叶后上分割)之间的联系,但不一致地支持左前额叶的参与。然而,这些研究主要集中在主题角色分配上,而没有考虑形态句法过程。因此,现有的VLSM证据可以提供句子理解的神经功能基础的部分视图。在本VLSM研究中,系统地评估了每个参与者在相同句子类型中的形态句法和主题过程,以提供更详细的句子理解网络图像。参与者(33名中风后失语症患者和90名健康对照者)完成了一个句子-图片匹配任务,其中主动和被动、陈述性可逆句子与形态句法、主题和词汇语义替代句子配对。语音短期记忆任务也被执行。从最初的70名失语症参与者中选择,因为他们在主题箔(n = 18)或主题和形态箔(n = 15)上得分低于标准,但在词汇-语义箔上得分在标准之内。形态句法和主题过程的神经功能相关是明显可区分的。包括额下回和额中回在内的前额叶区域直接参与局部形态句法特征的处理,仅间接参与主题加工。当这些区域被破坏时,形态句法错误总是与主位错误同时发生,这可能是因为形态句法的破坏破坏了语法角色的分配,最终破坏了主位角色的分配。形态句法错误不受词序规整性的影响。相比之下,选择性主题角色逆转与颞叶和顶叶损伤有关,并受到词序的显著影响,在被动句中比在主动句中更多地发生。包括角回和超边缘回在内的一个区域对于处理非规范语序至关重要。在句子理解中,前额叶区域是处理局部形态句法特征的关键区域(至少在简单陈述句中)。颞叶和顶叶区域对主题过程至关重要。后上颞区参与动词参数结构的检索。顶叶区对于将形态句法分析的成分分配到适当的主题角色至关重要,因此在主题再分析中起着至关重要的作用。每个区域在这些过程中都起着主导作用,但不是排他性的作用,它们与网络中的其他区域相互作用,并可能提供句子理解不同阶段所需的特定语言和一般领域资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信