Cameron Keating, Steven C Marcus, Cadence F Bowden, Diana Worsley, Stephanie K Doupnik
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Department Telemental Health Care Implementation Survey.","authors":"Cameron Keating, Steven C Marcus, Cadence F Bowden, Diana Worsley, Stephanie K Doupnik","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Implementation of telemental health care in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States (U.S.) has been increasing. Artificial intelligence (AI) can augment traditional qualitative research methods; little is known about its efficiency and accuracy. This study sought to understand ED directors' qualitative recommendations for improving telemental health care implementation and to understand how AI could facilitate analysis of qualitative survey responses. <b>Methods</b>: Directors at a nationally representative sample of 279 U.S. EDs that used telemental health care completed an open-ended survey question about improving telemental health care implementation between June 2022 and October 2023. Two groups of researchers completed independent qualitative coding of responses: one group used traditional qualitative methods, and one group used AI (ChatGPT 4.0) to facilitate analysis. Both groups independently developed a codebook, came to consensus on a combined codebook, and each group independently used it to code the survey responses. The two groups identified themes in ED directors' recommendations and compared codebooks and code application across traditional and AI approaches. <b>Results</b>: Themes included (1) recommendations for improving telemental health care directly and (2) recommendations for improving mental health care systems broadly to make telehealth more effective. ED directors' most common recommendation was enabling faster and more streamlined access to telemental health care. AI augmented human coding by identifying two valid codes not initially identified by human analysts. In codebook application, 75% of responses were coded consistently across AI and human coders. <b>Conclusions and Relevance</b>: For US EDs using telemental health care, there is a need to improve timeliness and efficiency of access to telemental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"821-828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Implementation of telemental health care in emergency departments (EDs) in the United States (U.S.) has been increasing. Artificial intelligence (AI) can augment traditional qualitative research methods; little is known about its efficiency and accuracy. This study sought to understand ED directors' qualitative recommendations for improving telemental health care implementation and to understand how AI could facilitate analysis of qualitative survey responses. Methods: Directors at a nationally representative sample of 279 U.S. EDs that used telemental health care completed an open-ended survey question about improving telemental health care implementation between June 2022 and October 2023. Two groups of researchers completed independent qualitative coding of responses: one group used traditional qualitative methods, and one group used AI (ChatGPT 4.0) to facilitate analysis. Both groups independently developed a codebook, came to consensus on a combined codebook, and each group independently used it to code the survey responses. The two groups identified themes in ED directors' recommendations and compared codebooks and code application across traditional and AI approaches. Results: Themes included (1) recommendations for improving telemental health care directly and (2) recommendations for improving mental health care systems broadly to make telehealth more effective. ED directors' most common recommendation was enabling faster and more streamlined access to telemental health care. AI augmented human coding by identifying two valid codes not initially identified by human analysts. In codebook application, 75% of responses were coded consistently across AI and human coders. Conclusions and Relevance: For US EDs using telemental health care, there is a need to improve timeliness and efficiency of access to telemental health care.
期刊介绍:
Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings.
Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.