Daniela Viramontes-Hörner, Paul Stewart, Jill Stewart, Maarten W Taal, Nicholas M Selby
{"title":"A novel system to continuously estimate intradialytic blood pressure in real-time.","authors":"Daniela Viramontes-Hörner, Paul Stewart, Jill Stewart, Maarten W Taal, Nicholas M Selby","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of haemodialysis that is associated with adverse patient outcomes. We have developed a new non-invasive approach to continuously estimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) in real time during haemodialysis using pressure wave sensors in the extracorporeal circuit. We sought to compare the performance of our continuous real-time SBP estimator against brachial cuff SBP measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-centre, observational study conducted in 21 participants receiving haemodialysis with a functioning arteriovenous fistula, studied throughout two 4-hour haemodialysis sessions. Time-averaged real-time SBP estimator values from the 5-second period immediately prior to each cuff measurement were compared with matched brachial cuff SBP values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 71 ± 11 years and median dialysis vintage was 20.0 months (IQR 12.5-63.5). Across 522 SBP comparison data points, mean brachial cuff SBP and real-time SBP estimate were 121.8 ± 27.1 mmHg and 123.7 ± 27.9 mmHg, respectively. Brachial cuff SBP and real-time SBP estimate were significantly associated (r = 0.825; p < 0.001). There was a low absolute mean difference between the brachial cuff SBP and the real-time SBP estimate of -1.9±16 mmHg, and no evidence of systematic bias between measurements. Across all comparison points, 95% of estimator values were within 30% of the matched brachial cuff value, and 66% within 10% of the cuff value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A BP estimator that runs in real time during haemodialysis using pressure wave sensors in the extracorporeal circuit and avoiding additional sensor-burden on patients has good performance in tracking intradialytic SBP when compared against brachial cuff measurements, supporting its further development and larger scale testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication of haemodialysis that is associated with adverse patient outcomes. We have developed a new non-invasive approach to continuously estimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) in real time during haemodialysis using pressure wave sensors in the extracorporeal circuit. We sought to compare the performance of our continuous real-time SBP estimator against brachial cuff SBP measurements.
Methods: Single-centre, observational study conducted in 21 participants receiving haemodialysis with a functioning arteriovenous fistula, studied throughout two 4-hour haemodialysis sessions. Time-averaged real-time SBP estimator values from the 5-second period immediately prior to each cuff measurement were compared with matched brachial cuff SBP values.
Results: Mean age was 71 ± 11 years and median dialysis vintage was 20.0 months (IQR 12.5-63.5). Across 522 SBP comparison data points, mean brachial cuff SBP and real-time SBP estimate were 121.8 ± 27.1 mmHg and 123.7 ± 27.9 mmHg, respectively. Brachial cuff SBP and real-time SBP estimate were significantly associated (r = 0.825; p < 0.001). There was a low absolute mean difference between the brachial cuff SBP and the real-time SBP estimate of -1.9±16 mmHg, and no evidence of systematic bias between measurements. Across all comparison points, 95% of estimator values were within 30% of the matched brachial cuff value, and 66% within 10% of the cuff value.
Conclusions: A BP estimator that runs in real time during haemodialysis using pressure wave sensors in the extracorporeal circuit and avoiding additional sensor-burden on patients has good performance in tracking intradialytic SBP when compared against brachial cuff measurements, supporting its further development and larger scale testing.
期刊介绍:
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
Print ISSN: 0931-0509.