Abner Sergooris, Jonas Verbrugghe, Bonnechère Bruno, Timo Meus, Maaike Van Den Houte, Corten Kristoff, Bogaerts Katleen, Annick Timmermans
{"title":"Psychosocial factors are associated with altered pain processing in individuals with hip osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Abner Sergooris, Jonas Verbrugghe, Bonnechère Bruno, Timo Meus, Maaike Van Den Houte, Corten Kristoff, Bogaerts Katleen, Annick Timmermans","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alterations in central pain processing are hypothesized to underlie the discordance between pain and radiographic osteoarthritis severity, as well as the association between psychological trauma and pain sensitivity. This cross-sectional study explored whether psychosocial factors and traumatic experiences are associated with central pain processing in individuals with hip osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Independent variables included sociodemographic information, traumatic experiences, psychiatric disorders, symptoms of anxiety and depression, fear-avoidance, perceived injustice, general self-efficacy, perceived stress, social support, and pain-related variables. Thermal quantitative sensory testing was used to assess central pain processing through heat pain thresholds, temporal adaptation and summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-three individuals with hip osteoarthritis were included. Sex differences were identified in measures of central pain processing. In combination with biological and pain-related factors, psychosocial factors explained between 11% and 21% of the variance in central pain processing. The selection of biopsychosocial variables and the direction of their effect differed between male and female participants. Inconsistent results were found regarding the association between traumatic experiences and central pain processing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychosocial factors contributed to the variance in quantitative sensory testing outcomes beyond the influence of biomedical variables. Different associations were found in male and female participants between psychosocial factors and central pain processing. Inconsistent results were found regarding the association between traumatic experiences and altered central pain processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Alterations in central pain processing are hypothesized to underlie the discordance between pain and radiographic osteoarthritis severity, as well as the association between psychological trauma and pain sensitivity. This cross-sectional study explored whether psychosocial factors and traumatic experiences are associated with central pain processing in individuals with hip osteoarthritis.
Method: Independent variables included sociodemographic information, traumatic experiences, psychiatric disorders, symptoms of anxiety and depression, fear-avoidance, perceived injustice, general self-efficacy, perceived stress, social support, and pain-related variables. Thermal quantitative sensory testing was used to assess central pain processing through heat pain thresholds, temporal adaptation and summation, and conditioned pain modulation. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression analyses were performed.
Results: One hundred thirty-three individuals with hip osteoarthritis were included. Sex differences were identified in measures of central pain processing. In combination with biological and pain-related factors, psychosocial factors explained between 11% and 21% of the variance in central pain processing. The selection of biopsychosocial variables and the direction of their effect differed between male and female participants. Inconsistent results were found regarding the association between traumatic experiences and central pain processing.
Conclusions: Psychosocial factors contributed to the variance in quantitative sensory testing outcomes beyond the influence of biomedical variables. Different associations were found in male and female participants between psychosocial factors and central pain processing. Inconsistent results were found regarding the association between traumatic experiences and altered central pain processing.
期刊介绍:
Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.