{"title":"Prediction Model of Survival in Unresectable HCC with Central Bile Duct Invasion Receiving TACE After Biliary Drainage: TEMP Score.","authors":"Wenzhe Fan, Xinlin Zheng, Weihong Zhang, Bowen Zhu, Yanqin Wu, Miao Xue, Rong Tang, Zhen Huang, Liangliang Qiao, Mingjian Lu, Jian Wu, Yiyang Tang, Jinghua Chen, Shugui Huang, Mingjun Bai, Jiaping Li","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S505328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Central bile duct invasion (BDI) by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare and associated with poor prognosis, lacking treatment guidelines. While transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is often used for unresectable cases, determining optimal candidates post-biliary drainage is controversial. We aim to develop a prognostic prediction model for unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients with central BDI receiving sequential TACE after successful biliary drainage.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 267 uHCC patients with central BDI receiving successful biliary drainage and sequential TACE from seven tertiary centers (2015-2021), divided into training (n=187) and validation (n=80) sets. Using Cox proportional-hazards regression model, we identified key prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS) and constructed a prediction model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) values, extrahepatic spread (EHS), multiple intrahepatic tumors (MIT), and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) were identified as the significant clinical indicators for OS. These four parameters were included in a novel prediction model, named TEMP score, which could successfully categorize patients in the training set into three distinct risk grades with median OS of 26.9, 9.4, and 5.8 months, respectively. The TEMP score predicted the time-dependent areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of 0.813/0.907, 0.833/0.782, and 0.838/0.811 in the training and validation sets, with corresponding C-indices of 0.812/0.929, 0.829/0.761, and 0.818/0.791, respectively, outperforming other currently available models in both cohorts. The calibration curve of the model for predicting OS presented good consistency between observations and predictions in both the training set and validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TEMP score effectively stratifies the prognosis of uHCC patients with central BDI who have undergone successful bile drainage and sequential TACE, helping to identify those who may benefit from TACE treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"615-628"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S505328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Central bile duct invasion (BDI) by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare and associated with poor prognosis, lacking treatment guidelines. While transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is often used for unresectable cases, determining optimal candidates post-biliary drainage is controversial. We aim to develop a prognostic prediction model for unresectable HCC (uHCC) patients with central BDI receiving sequential TACE after successful biliary drainage.
Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 267 uHCC patients with central BDI receiving successful biliary drainage and sequential TACE from seven tertiary centers (2015-2021), divided into training (n=187) and validation (n=80) sets. Using Cox proportional-hazards regression model, we identified key prognostic indicators for overall survival (OS) and constructed a prediction model.
Results: Pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) values, extrahepatic spread (EHS), multiple intrahepatic tumors (MIT), and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) were identified as the significant clinical indicators for OS. These four parameters were included in a novel prediction model, named TEMP score, which could successfully categorize patients in the training set into three distinct risk grades with median OS of 26.9, 9.4, and 5.8 months, respectively. The TEMP score predicted the time-dependent areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of 0.813/0.907, 0.833/0.782, and 0.838/0.811 in the training and validation sets, with corresponding C-indices of 0.812/0.929, 0.829/0.761, and 0.818/0.791, respectively, outperforming other currently available models in both cohorts. The calibration curve of the model for predicting OS presented good consistency between observations and predictions in both the training set and validation set.
Conclusion: The TEMP score effectively stratifies the prognosis of uHCC patients with central BDI who have undergone successful bile drainage and sequential TACE, helping to identify those who may benefit from TACE treatment.