Establishment of an Accurate and Precise Alternative Intraoperative Technique for Determination of Femoral Version.

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Benjamin Yao, Don Li, Jonathan Cui, Kira L Smith, Vineet Tyagi, Joseph B Kahan, Allen Daniel Nicholson, Brian G Smith, Raymond Liu, Daniel Roy Cooperman
{"title":"Establishment of an Accurate and Precise Alternative Intraoperative Technique for Determination of Femoral Version.","authors":"Benjamin Yao, Don Li, Jonathan Cui, Kira L Smith, Vineet Tyagi, Joseph B Kahan, Allen Daniel Nicholson, Brian G Smith, Raymond Liu, Daniel Roy Cooperman","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate assessment of the femoral version can be challenging in the operating room. We evaluated if an observer can reliably and accurately determine when a femoral neck is parallel to the floor with a modified C-arm technique. We compared this technique to the previously reported modified Ogata-Goldsand technique for determining the intraoperative femoral version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate if an observer can determine when the femoral neck is level to the ground, 72 cadaveric femurs were photographed laterally at the proximal femur with the bone rotated to simulate a version ranging from -20 degrees to +20 degrees in 5-degree increments. These were arranged in a grid layout and validated through 3-fold randomization and blinding. Five investigators selected the orientation they believed to be closest to the neutral (0 degrees) femoral version. Then, 4 full-size cadavers were examined in a surgical suite. The femoral version of each full-size femoral cadaver was estimated utilizing the modified C-arm technique versus the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique, with the Kingsley and Olmsted technique used as the widely accepted standard to measure the femoral version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In determining the neutral femoral neck position, observers were able to determine 0 degrees of version accurately, with the average deviation being 4.4 ± 2.4 degrees. The modified C-arm technique produced an average measurement deviating 3.2 ± 4.2 degrees from the true value. The modified Ogata-Goldsand technique had an average measurement deviation of 2.3 ± 2.6 degrees from the true angle. The modified C-arm technique had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82 for different observers and 0.81 when compared to the Kingsley and Olmsted method as the standard, versus 0.72 and 0.90 for the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observers can accurately perceive when a femoral neck is parallel to a virtual floor, supporting the inclusion of this parameter in the modified C-arm technique. Utilization of the modified C-arm technique is comparable to the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The relative simplicity of the modified C-arm technique versus the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique makes the modified C-arm technique a reasonable additional option for measuring intraoperative femoral version.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of the femoral version can be challenging in the operating room. We evaluated if an observer can reliably and accurately determine when a femoral neck is parallel to the floor with a modified C-arm technique. We compared this technique to the previously reported modified Ogata-Goldsand technique for determining the intraoperative femoral version.

Methods: To evaluate if an observer can determine when the femoral neck is level to the ground, 72 cadaveric femurs were photographed laterally at the proximal femur with the bone rotated to simulate a version ranging from -20 degrees to +20 degrees in 5-degree increments. These were arranged in a grid layout and validated through 3-fold randomization and blinding. Five investigators selected the orientation they believed to be closest to the neutral (0 degrees) femoral version. Then, 4 full-size cadavers were examined in a surgical suite. The femoral version of each full-size femoral cadaver was estimated utilizing the modified C-arm technique versus the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique, with the Kingsley and Olmsted technique used as the widely accepted standard to measure the femoral version.

Results: In determining the neutral femoral neck position, observers were able to determine 0 degrees of version accurately, with the average deviation being 4.4 ± 2.4 degrees. The modified C-arm technique produced an average measurement deviating 3.2 ± 4.2 degrees from the true value. The modified Ogata-Goldsand technique had an average measurement deviation of 2.3 ± 2.6 degrees from the true angle. The modified C-arm technique had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82 for different observers and 0.81 when compared to the Kingsley and Olmsted method as the standard, versus 0.72 and 0.90 for the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique.

Conclusions: Observers can accurately perceive when a femoral neck is parallel to a virtual floor, supporting the inclusion of this parameter in the modified C-arm technique. Utilization of the modified C-arm technique is comparable to the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique.

Clinical relevance: The relative simplicity of the modified C-arm technique versus the modified Ogata-Goldsand technique makes the modified C-arm technique a reasonable additional option for measuring intraoperative femoral version.

建立一种准确、精确的术中测定股骨变形的替代技术。
背景:在手术室中,准确评估股骨版本是具有挑战性的。我们评估了观察者是否能够可靠和准确地判断股骨颈何时与地板平行,采用改良的c臂技术。我们将该技术与先前报道的改良Ogata-Goldsand技术进行比较,以确定术中股骨的形态。方法:为了评估观察者是否可以确定股骨颈何时与地面水平,在股骨近端拍摄了72具尸体股骨的侧面照片,并旋转骨头以5度的增量模拟-20度至+20度的版本。这些数据以网格布局排列,并通过3倍随机化和盲法进行验证。五名研究者选择了他们认为最接近中性(0度)股骨的方向。然后,在手术室里检查了4具全尺寸的尸体。利用改进的c臂技术和改进的Ogata-Goldsand技术对每个全尺寸股骨尸体的股骨版本进行估计,并使用Kingsley和Olmsted技术作为广泛接受的标准来测量股骨版本。结果:在确定股骨颈中性位时,观测者能够准确地确定0度的版本,平均偏差为4.4±2.4度。改进的c臂技术产生的平均测量值与真实值偏差3.2±4.2度。改进的Ogata-Goldsand技术与真实角度的平均测量偏差为2.3±2.6度。与Kingsley和Olmsted方法相比,改进的c臂技术的类内相关系数为0.82,与作为标准的Kingsley和Olmsted方法相比为0.81,而改进的Ogata-Goldsand技术为0.72和0.90。结论:观察者可以准确地感知到股骨颈与虚拟地板平行,支持将该参数纳入改进的c臂技术。改进的c臂技术的使用与改进的Ogata-Goldsand技术相当。临床意义:改良的c臂技术相对于改良的Ogata-Goldsand技术相对简单,使得改良的c臂技术成为术中测量股骨版本的一个合理的额外选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信