{"title":"The patient enablement instrument for back pain turkish version, validity and reliability study.","authors":"Erkan Erol, Halime Arikan","doi":"10.1177/10538127251322855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.<b>ClinicalTrials.gov ID:</b> NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251322855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251322855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe only survey that assesses the ability of individuals with low back pain to self-manage their condition is the Patient Enablement Instrument for Back Pain (PEI-BP).ObjectiveThe study aims to create a Turkish version of PEI-BP and test its validity and reliability.Methods67 individuals (47 females, 20 males) with low back pain participated, comprising. Reliability was evaluated through test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and repeatability measures. Validity was assessed via structural, content, face validity analyses. Floor and ceiling effects were examined to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. Additionally, the relationship between PEI-BP and pain intensity, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) was explored.ResultsThe Intraclass Correlation Coefficient value (0.795) and Cronbach's α (0.886) of PEI-BP were high. The goodness-of-fit values for the model, including fit indices and reference ranges, indicated strong validity. The PEI-BP demonstrated the absence of both floor and ceiling effects. Correlations between PEI-BP and pain intensity, BIPQ, FABQ, ODI, and SF-36 exhibited a range from weak to good (0.258 to -0.440).ConclusionsPEI-BP has demonstrated high reliability and good validity. PEI-BP can be used to evaluate Turkish-speaking individuals with low back pain.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06109246 (Date: 10/25/2023).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.