Comparing the clinical efficacy of multiple vs. single dose ozone (O2-O3) injections and corticosteroid injection in subacromial impingement syndrome: A prospective, randomized controlled trial with One-Year Follow-Up.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Mehmet Cenk Turgut, Yavuz Şahbat, Ali Afşar, Aslı Turgut, Muhammed Çağatay Engin, Gonca Sağlam Akkaya
{"title":"Comparing the clinical efficacy of multiple vs. single dose ozone (O2-O3) injections and corticosteroid injection in subacromial impingement syndrome: A prospective, randomized controlled trial with One-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Mehmet Cenk Turgut, Yavuz Şahbat, Ali Afşar, Aslı Turgut, Muhammed Çağatay Engin, Gonca Sağlam Akkaya","doi":"10.1177/10538127251322859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOzone (O2-O3) therapy, is a novel and increasingly utilized intervention in musculoskeletal medicine. This therapeutic approach has gained attention for its potential in managing conditions such as chronic pain, arthritis, and soft tissue injuries, offering a minimally invasive alternative to conventional treatments.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the effectiveness of multiple-dose ozone injections in subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) and to compare it with single-dose ozone and corticosteroids regarding patient-related clinical outcomes.MethodsThis single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comprised 108 SAIS patients divided into three groups: Group 1, multiple-dose ozone (50 mcg ozone/ week for five weeks); Group 2, single-dose ozone (50 mcg ozone) and Group 3, single-dose corticosteroid (40 mg triamcinolone). The pain, functionality, and quality of life of the patients were evaluated via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Constant-Murley score (CMS), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scale (UCLA), and 36-Item Survey Short-Form (SF-36) in three, six and twelve months. ANOVA/Friedman's test was applied to evaluate the statistical differences between the groups for each outcome measure at each time point.ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 53.3 ± 3.1 years, and 52.8% of them were female. In the first week, the steroid group scored less than the other two groups (p < 0.001) in VAS. At 3, 6, and 12 months, CMS was significantly higher in the multiple ozone group compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001 for all). UCLA scores increased in all groups, with the greatest improvement observed in the multiple ozone group. After 12 months, all groups differed significantly in SF-36 scores (65.0 [11.0] in the multiple-ozone group, 43.5 [4.8] in the ozone group, and 40.0 [11.0] in the steroid group, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMultiple ozone (O2-O3) injections had better patient-related outcomes regarding pain, functioning, and quality of life in patients with SAIS in 3-m, 6-m, and one-year follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251322859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251322859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOzone (O2-O3) therapy, is a novel and increasingly utilized intervention in musculoskeletal medicine. This therapeutic approach has gained attention for its potential in managing conditions such as chronic pain, arthritis, and soft tissue injuries, offering a minimally invasive alternative to conventional treatments.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the effectiveness of multiple-dose ozone injections in subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS) and to compare it with single-dose ozone and corticosteroids regarding patient-related clinical outcomes.MethodsThis single-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comprised 108 SAIS patients divided into three groups: Group 1, multiple-dose ozone (50 mcg ozone/ week for five weeks); Group 2, single-dose ozone (50 mcg ozone) and Group 3, single-dose corticosteroid (40 mg triamcinolone). The pain, functionality, and quality of life of the patients were evaluated via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Constant-Murley score (CMS), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scale (UCLA), and 36-Item Survey Short-Form (SF-36) in three, six and twelve months. ANOVA/Friedman's test was applied to evaluate the statistical differences between the groups for each outcome measure at each time point.ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 53.3 ± 3.1 years, and 52.8% of them were female. In the first week, the steroid group scored less than the other two groups (p < 0.001) in VAS. At 3, 6, and 12 months, CMS was significantly higher in the multiple ozone group compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001 for all). UCLA scores increased in all groups, with the greatest improvement observed in the multiple ozone group. After 12 months, all groups differed significantly in SF-36 scores (65.0 [11.0] in the multiple-ozone group, 43.5 [4.8] in the ozone group, and 40.0 [11.0] in the steroid group, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMultiple ozone (O2-O3) injections had better patient-related outcomes regarding pain, functioning, and quality of life in patients with SAIS in 3-m, 6-m, and one-year follow-up periods.

比较多剂量臭氧(O2-O3)注射与单剂量皮质类固醇注射治疗肩峰下撞击综合征的临床疗效:一项为期一年随访的前瞻性随机对照试验。
臭氧(O2-O3)治疗是一种新型且越来越多地应用于肌肉骨骼医学的干预措施。这种治疗方法因其在治疗慢性疼痛、关节炎和软组织损伤等疾病方面的潜力而受到关注,为传统治疗提供了一种微创替代方法。目的探讨多剂量臭氧注射治疗肩峰下撞击综合征(SAIS)的疗效,并与单剂量臭氧和皮质类固醇治疗患者相关临床结果进行比较。方法采用单中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验,将108例SAIS患者分为3组:1组多剂量臭氧(50 mcg /周,持续5周);2组单剂量臭氧(50 mcg臭氧),3组单剂量皮质类固醇(曲安奈德酮40 mg)。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Constant-Murley评分(CMS)、加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部量表(UCLA)和36项调查简表(SF-36)在3个月、6个月和12个月对患者的疼痛、功能和生活质量进行评估。采用方差分析/弗里德曼检验评价各组间各时间点各项指标的统计学差异。结果研究人群平均年龄为53.3±3.1岁,女性占52.8%。在第一周,类固醇组得分低于其他两组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信