Assessing Fitspiration Content: A Mixed Methods Study on the Effects of an Ecological Momentary Assessment on Body Appreciation, Social Comparison, and Media Literacy Among Young Women.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jessica Fitts Willoughby, Leticia Couto
{"title":"Assessing Fitspiration Content: A Mixed Methods Study on the Effects of an Ecological Momentary Assessment on Body Appreciation, Social Comparison, and Media Literacy Among Young Women.","authors":"Jessica Fitts Willoughby, Leticia Couto","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2480685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viewing fitness content on social media is associated with body dissatisfaction among young women. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a form of intensive longitudinal measurement, can allow for the examination of differential media effects. EMAs about media in conjunction with health topics may influence participants' awareness of the content to which they are exposed and possibly impact behaviors. We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study to see whether an EMA focused on experiences with fitspiration content and body appreciation would be associated with changes in body appreciation, social comparison, and media literacy. We conducted a pretest posttest field experiment (<i>N</i> = 40) in which young women (ages 18-24) in Washington state completed a pretest sent via text message followed by two daily surveys over 4 days, followed by a posttest. We then conducted follow-up interviews with a subset of participants (<i>N</i> = 7) about their experiences. Paired samples t-tests revealed that the experience of completing the EMAs reduced participants' social comparison. Our thematic analysis highlighted that participants' study experiences impacted their awareness of the content to which they were exposed. They also were aware of potential mechanisms through which impacts may occur (e.g., self-comparison). The use of EMAs can positively impact outcomes relevant to body image, specifically, social comparison. Asking participants to reflect on their perceptions of the content to which they are exposed can call attention to such content as well as potential effects, serving an intervention function and potentially benefiting participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2480685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viewing fitness content on social media is associated with body dissatisfaction among young women. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA), a form of intensive longitudinal measurement, can allow for the examination of differential media effects. EMAs about media in conjunction with health topics may influence participants' awareness of the content to which they are exposed and possibly impact behaviors. We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed methods study to see whether an EMA focused on experiences with fitspiration content and body appreciation would be associated with changes in body appreciation, social comparison, and media literacy. We conducted a pretest posttest field experiment (N = 40) in which young women (ages 18-24) in Washington state completed a pretest sent via text message followed by two daily surveys over 4 days, followed by a posttest. We then conducted follow-up interviews with a subset of participants (N = 7) about their experiences. Paired samples t-tests revealed that the experience of completing the EMAs reduced participants' social comparison. Our thematic analysis highlighted that participants' study experiences impacted their awareness of the content to which they were exposed. They also were aware of potential mechanisms through which impacts may occur (e.g., self-comparison). The use of EMAs can positively impact outcomes relevant to body image, specifically, social comparison. Asking participants to reflect on their perceptions of the content to which they are exposed can call attention to such content as well as potential effects, serving an intervention function and potentially benefiting participants.

评估Fitspiration Content:一项关于年轻女性身体欣赏、社会比较和媒介素养的生态瞬间评估影响的混合方法研究。
在社交媒体上观看健身内容与年轻女性对身体的不满有关。生态瞬时评估(EMA),一种密集的纵向测量形式,可以允许检查差异介质的影响。关于媒体的环境评估与健康主题相结合,可能影响参与者对他们所接触的内容的认识,并可能影响行为。我们进行了一项解释性顺序混合方法研究,以了解关注体湿含量和身体欣赏体验的EMA是否与身体欣赏、社会比较和媒体素养的变化有关。我们进行了一项前测后测现场实验(N = 40),其中华盛顿州的年轻女性(18-24岁)在4天内完成了通过短信发送的前测,随后进行了两次每日调查,然后进行了后测。然后,我们对一部分参与者(N = 7)进行了随访访谈,了解他们的经历。配对样本t检验显示,完成ema的经历减少了参与者的社会比较。我们的专题分析强调,参与者的学习经历影响了他们对所接触内容的认识。他们也意识到可能产生影响的潜在机制(例如,自我比较)。EMAs的使用可以积极影响与身体形象相关的结果,特别是社会比较。要求参与者反思他们对所接触内容的看法,可以引起对这些内容及其潜在影响的注意,起到干预作用,并可能使参与者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信