Martina Zahradnická, Lenka Nemétová, Michal Kahle, David Vávra, Robert Bém, Peter Girman, Martin Haluzík, František Saudek
{"title":"Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes after Pancreas Transplantation: Does Automated Delivery Offer Comparable Results?","authors":"Martina Zahradnická, Lenka Nemétová, Michal Kahle, David Vávra, Robert Bém, Peter Girman, Martin Haluzík, František Saudek","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Pancreas transplantation provides long-term near-normal glycemic control for recipients with type 1 diabetes, but it is unknown how this control compares with an automated insulin delivery (AID) system. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this prospective study, we compared parameters from 31 consecutive pancreas-kidney transplantation recipients versus from 377 people using an AID-either MiniMed<sup>™</sup> 780G (<i>n</i> = 200) or Tandem t:slim X2<sup>™</sup> Control-IQ<sup>™</sup> (<i>n</i> = 177). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with the MiniMed and Tandem AID groups, transplant recipients at 1 month (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 36 ± 12 days) after pancreas transplantation exhibited significantly lower glycated hemoglobin (38 mmol/mol [36, 40] vs. 55 [53, 56.5] and 56 [54.7, 57.2], respectively), lower mean glycemia (6.4 mmol/L [6, 6.8] vs. 8.5 [8.3, 8.7] and 8.2 [8.0, 8.4], respectively), and spent more time in range (90% [86, 93] vs. 72% [70, 74] and 75% [73, 77], respectively). Time in hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Overall, compared with AID treatment, pancreas transplantation led to significantly better diabetes control parameters, with the exception of time below range. Clinical trials registration number is Eudra CT No. 2019-002240-24.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Pancreas transplantation provides long-term near-normal glycemic control for recipients with type 1 diabetes, but it is unknown how this control compares with an automated insulin delivery (AID) system. Methods: In this prospective study, we compared parameters from 31 consecutive pancreas-kidney transplantation recipients versus from 377 people using an AID-either MiniMed™ 780G (n = 200) or Tandem t:slim X2™ Control-IQ™ (n = 177). Results: Compared with the MiniMed and Tandem AID groups, transplant recipients at 1 month (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 36 ± 12 days) after pancreas transplantation exhibited significantly lower glycated hemoglobin (38 mmol/mol [36, 40] vs. 55 [53, 56.5] and 56 [54.7, 57.2], respectively), lower mean glycemia (6.4 mmol/L [6, 6.8] vs. 8.5 [8.3, 8.7] and 8.2 [8.0, 8.4], respectively), and spent more time in range (90% [86, 93] vs. 72% [70, 74] and 75% [73, 77], respectively). Time in hypoglycemia did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Overall, compared with AID treatment, pancreas transplantation led to significantly better diabetes control parameters, with the exception of time below range. Clinical trials registration number is Eudra CT No. 2019-002240-24.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.