Randomised trial of assessing diagnostic yield in transbronchial biopsy with a guide sheath.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00771-2024
Hao-Chun Chang, Yao-Wen Kuo, Ching-Kai Lin, Lih-Chyun Chang, You-Yi Chen, Ching-Yao Yang, Jung-Yien Chien, Chia-Lin Hsu, Tzu-Hsiu Tsai, Chao-Chi Ho, Jin-Yuan Shih, Chong-Jen Yu
{"title":"Randomised trial of assessing diagnostic yield in transbronchial biopsy with a guide sheath.","authors":"Hao-Chun Chang, Yao-Wen Kuo, Ching-Kai Lin, Lih-Chyun Chang, You-Yi Chen, Ching-Yao Yang, Jung-Yien Chien, Chia-Lin Hsu, Tzu-Hsiu Tsai, Chao-Chi Ho, Jin-Yuan Shih, Chong-Jen Yu","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00771-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS)-guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with a guide sheath (GS) is widely used to diagnose peripheral lung lesions (PPLs), but there is no consensus on whether it increases the diagnostic yield. We conducted this prospective study to compare the diagnostic yield of the GS method to the conventional method without a GS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2019 to March 2023, patients with PPLs were recruited and randomly assigned to rEBUS-TBB with a GS (GS group) or without a GS (conventional group). The histopathology, cytology and microbiology yield rates, as well as procedure time and post-procedure adverse events, of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients were enrolled (54 in the GS group and 48 in the conventional group). The pathology yield showed no statistical difference between the two groups (75.9% <i>versus</i> 68.8%, p=0.418), while the yield rates of brushing cytology (64.3% <i>versus</i> 42.9%, p=0.030) and washing cytology (41.5% <i>versus</i> 20.0%, p=0.0443) were higher in the GS group. Meanwhile, the yield from GS washing culture was lower than the bronchial washing culture yield (0% <i>versus</i> 57.1%, p=0.017). The bleeding risk was also lower in the GS group (9.3% <i>versus</i> 20.8%, p=0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pathology yield of rEBUS TBB with a GS did not significantly differ from the conventional method. However, a GS could improve the cytology yield rate and reduce the risk of bleeding. To enhance the microbiology yield, additional bronchial washing should be utilised.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00771-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS)-guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with a guide sheath (GS) is widely used to diagnose peripheral lung lesions (PPLs), but there is no consensus on whether it increases the diagnostic yield. We conducted this prospective study to compare the diagnostic yield of the GS method to the conventional method without a GS.

Methods: From November 2019 to March 2023, patients with PPLs were recruited and randomly assigned to rEBUS-TBB with a GS (GS group) or without a GS (conventional group). The histopathology, cytology and microbiology yield rates, as well as procedure time and post-procedure adverse events, of the two groups were compared.

Results: A total of 102 patients were enrolled (54 in the GS group and 48 in the conventional group). The pathology yield showed no statistical difference between the two groups (75.9% versus 68.8%, p=0.418), while the yield rates of brushing cytology (64.3% versus 42.9%, p=0.030) and washing cytology (41.5% versus 20.0%, p=0.0443) were higher in the GS group. Meanwhile, the yield from GS washing culture was lower than the bronchial washing culture yield (0% versus 57.1%, p=0.017). The bleeding risk was also lower in the GS group (9.3% versus 20.8%, p=0.049).

Conclusion: The pathology yield of rEBUS TBB with a GS did not significantly differ from the conventional method. However, a GS could improve the cytology yield rate and reduce the risk of bleeding. To enhance the microbiology yield, additional bronchial washing should be utilised.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信