Mannitol-evoked cough response is reduced by inhaled salbutamol.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00815-2024
Mustafaa Wahab, Ruth P Cusack, Caitlin Stevens, Karen J Howie, Abbey Schlatman, Kieran J Killian, Paul M O'Byrne, Imran Satia, Gail M Gauvreau
{"title":"Mannitol-evoked cough response is reduced by inhaled salbutamol.","authors":"Mustafaa Wahab, Ruth P Cusack, Caitlin Stevens, Karen J Howie, Abbey Schlatman, Kieran J Killian, Paul M O'Byrne, Imran Satia, Gail M Gauvreau","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00815-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mannitol inhalation induces bronchoconstriction and coughing in asthmatic patients. Salbutamol causes smooth muscle relaxation in acute asthma, but its effects on airway nerves are unclear. We conducted mannitol cough challenges in allergic asthmatic patients (AAs) and healthy controls (HCs) to determine whether salbutamol would reduce mannitol-evoked coughs independent of changes in airway calibre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study included 20 mild steroid-naïve AAs and 20 HCs. The maximum number of coughs (Emax) evoked by mannitol was compared between salbutamol and placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCs and AAs were matched for age, lung function and sex. Mannitol-evoked cough dose ratio (CDR) in HCs was significantly lower than in AAs (5.63±1.84 <i>versus</i> 7.32±3.67 coughs, p=0.023). Both groups had similar Emax, C2 and C5 (dose causing two and five coughs, respectively). In AAs mannitol decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) by 8.11±2.32% with placebo, which was attenuated to 3.19±1.16% with salbutamol (p=0.03). In HCs, FEV<sub>1</sub> reduction was not significant. Emax in AAs for placebo and salbutamol was 8.90 (8.09-9.80) coughs and 7.07 (6.28-8.00) coughs, respectively (p<0.001) and in HCs 8.19 (7.08-9.61) coughs and 4.95 (4.38-5.66) coughs, respectively (p<0.001). The effect of salbutamol on Emax between groups was significantly different (p<0.001). Salbutamol improved CDR, C2 and C5 in AAs (p<0.05) but without effect between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salbutamol reduced mannitol Emax in AAs and HCs. The reduced mannitol-evoked cough response by salbutamol in HCs was independent of changes in airway calibre measured by FEV<sub>1</sub>, suggesting mechanisms of salbutamol extend beyond smooth muscle relaxation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00815-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mannitol inhalation induces bronchoconstriction and coughing in asthmatic patients. Salbutamol causes smooth muscle relaxation in acute asthma, but its effects on airway nerves are unclear. We conducted mannitol cough challenges in allergic asthmatic patients (AAs) and healthy controls (HCs) to determine whether salbutamol would reduce mannitol-evoked coughs independent of changes in airway calibre.

Methods: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study included 20 mild steroid-naïve AAs and 20 HCs. The maximum number of coughs (Emax) evoked by mannitol was compared between salbutamol and placebo.

Results: HCs and AAs were matched for age, lung function and sex. Mannitol-evoked cough dose ratio (CDR) in HCs was significantly lower than in AAs (5.63±1.84 versus 7.32±3.67 coughs, p=0.023). Both groups had similar Emax, C2 and C5 (dose causing two and five coughs, respectively). In AAs mannitol decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) by 8.11±2.32% with placebo, which was attenuated to 3.19±1.16% with salbutamol (p=0.03). In HCs, FEV1 reduction was not significant. Emax in AAs for placebo and salbutamol was 8.90 (8.09-9.80) coughs and 7.07 (6.28-8.00) coughs, respectively (p<0.001) and in HCs 8.19 (7.08-9.61) coughs and 4.95 (4.38-5.66) coughs, respectively (p<0.001). The effect of salbutamol on Emax between groups was significantly different (p<0.001). Salbutamol improved CDR, C2 and C5 in AAs (p<0.05) but without effect between groups.

Conclusion: Salbutamol reduced mannitol Emax in AAs and HCs. The reduced mannitol-evoked cough response by salbutamol in HCs was independent of changes in airway calibre measured by FEV1, suggesting mechanisms of salbutamol extend beyond smooth muscle relaxation.

吸入沙丁胺醇可减轻甘露醇引起的咳嗽反应。
背景:甘露醇吸入可引起哮喘患者支气管收缩和咳嗽。沙丁胺醇引起急性哮喘的平滑肌松弛,但其对气道神经的影响尚不清楚。我们对过敏性哮喘患者(AAs)和健康对照(hc)进行甘露醇咳嗽挑战,以确定沙丁胺醇是否会减轻甘露醇引起的咳嗽,而不依赖于气道径的变化。方法:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、双向交叉研究,包括20例轻度steroid-naïve AAs和20例hcc。比较甘露醇与安慰剂引起的最大咳嗽次数(Emax)。结果:hc和AAs在年龄、肺功能和性别上匹配。甘露醇诱发咳嗽剂量比(CDR)在hc组显著低于AAs组(5.63±1.84 vs 7.32±3.67,p=0.023)。两组的Emax、C2和C5剂量相似(分别引起2次和5次咳嗽)。甘露醇使AAs患者1 s内用力呼气量(FEV1)与安慰剂相比降低8.11±2.32%,与沙丁胺醇相比降低3.19±1.16% (p=0.03)。在hc中,FEV1的减少并不显著。安慰剂组和沙丁胺醇组AAs咳嗽时Emax值分别为8.90(8.09 ~ 9.80)和7.07(6.28 ~ 8.00)。结论:沙丁胺醇降低甘露醇对AAs和HCs的Emax值。沙丁胺醇在hc中引起的甘露醇引起的咳嗽反应的降低与FEV1测量的气道直径的变化无关,这表明沙丁胺醇的机制不仅仅是平滑肌松弛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信