Safety and Effectiveness of Clozapine in Youth and Young Adults with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Severe, Treatment-Refractory Irritability and Aggression: A Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Katherine Harris, Cara Fosdick, Katherine J Zappia, Kelli C Dominick, Martine Lamy
{"title":"Safety and Effectiveness of Clozapine in Youth and Young Adults with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Severe, Treatment-Refractory Irritability and Aggression: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Katherine Harris, Cara Fosdick, Katherine J Zappia, Kelli C Dominick, Martine Lamy","doi":"10.1089/cap.2024.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The purpose of this article was to review the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of clozapine in youth and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of youth and young adults with autism and/or intellectual disability who were prescribed clozapine between January 2012 and June 2020 was completed. Information was collected from 1 year before through 1 year after clozapine initiation related to medications prescribed, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Adverse effects and reasons for stopping clozapine were documented. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Fifty-eight patients were included in analysis. Forty patients remained on clozapine through June 2020 and 18 did not. Most patients were prescribed clozapine for treatment of irritability. Reasons for stopping clozapine included side effects, continued behavior concerns, difficulty with blood draws, and improvement in symptoms. For those who remained on clozapine for the duration of the review period, the number of hospitalizations and ED presentations for psychiatric concerns or medical concerns potentially related to clozapine significantly decreased in the year following clozapine initiation compared with the year prior (2.13 vs. 3.48, <i>p</i> = 0.010). There was a significant reduction in CGI-I scores from 3.96 to 2.53 (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from clozapine initiation to 1 year later. There was a nonsignificant trend toward reduction in use of multiple antipsychotics simultaneously from time of clozapine initiation to 1 year later in those who remained on clozapine (38.5% vs. 25%, <i>p</i> = 0.232). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Use of clozapine for treatment-refractory irritability in youth and young adults with ASD and/or intellectual disability is generally well-tolerated. Observed benefits included a decrease in number of hospitalizations and ED visits and a decrease in CGI-I score in the year after clozapine initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2024.0104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this article was to review the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of clozapine in youth and young adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and/or intellectual disability. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review of youth and young adults with autism and/or intellectual disability who were prescribed clozapine between January 2012 and June 2020 was completed. Information was collected from 1 year before through 1 year after clozapine initiation related to medications prescribed, hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Adverse effects and reasons for stopping clozapine were documented. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in analysis. Forty patients remained on clozapine through June 2020 and 18 did not. Most patients were prescribed clozapine for treatment of irritability. Reasons for stopping clozapine included side effects, continued behavior concerns, difficulty with blood draws, and improvement in symptoms. For those who remained on clozapine for the duration of the review period, the number of hospitalizations and ED presentations for psychiatric concerns or medical concerns potentially related to clozapine significantly decreased in the year following clozapine initiation compared with the year prior (2.13 vs. 3.48, p = 0.010). There was a significant reduction in CGI-I scores from 3.96 to 2.53 (p < 0.001) from clozapine initiation to 1 year later. There was a nonsignificant trend toward reduction in use of multiple antipsychotics simultaneously from time of clozapine initiation to 1 year later in those who remained on clozapine (38.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.232). Conclusions: Use of clozapine for treatment-refractory irritability in youth and young adults with ASD and/or intellectual disability is generally well-tolerated. Observed benefits included a decrease in number of hospitalizations and ED visits and a decrease in CGI-I score in the year after clozapine initiation.

氯氮平治疗神经发育障碍和严重难治性易怒和攻击的安全性和有效性:回顾性图表回顾。
目的:本文的目的是回顾氯氮平在患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和/或智力残疾的青少年和年轻人中的安全性、耐受性和有效性。方法:对2012年1月至2020年6月期间服用氯氮平的患有自闭症和/或智力残疾的青年和年轻成人患者进行了irb批准的回顾性图表回顾。收集氯氮平起始治疗前1年至1年后与处方药物、住院情况、急诊科(ED)就诊、临床总体印象-严重程度和临床总体印象-改善(CGI-I)评分相关的信息。不良反应和停止氯氮平的原因被记录。结果:58例患者纳入分析。40名患者在2020年6月之前一直服用氯氮平,18名患者没有服用氯氮平。大多数患者开氯氮平治疗易怒。停用氯氮平的原因包括副作用、持续的行为问题、抽血困难和症状改善。对于那些在回顾期间继续使用氯氮平的患者,在开始使用氯氮平后的一年中,因精神问题或可能与氯氮平相关的医学问题而住院和急诊的次数与前一年相比显著减少(2.13 vs. 3.48, p = 0.010)。从氯氮平开始治疗到1年后,CGI-I评分从3.96下降到2.53 (p < 0.001)。从开始使用氯氮平到1年后继续使用氯氮平的患者同时使用多种抗精神病药物的趋势没有显著性降低(38.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.232)。结论:在患有ASD和/或智力残疾的青少年和青壮年患者中,使用氯氮平治疗难治性易怒通常耐受性良好。观察到的益处包括住院次数和ED就诊次数的减少以及氯氮平开始后一年内CGI-I评分的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes: New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信