Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1177/02692155251326050
Owen Howlett, Tracy Harnetty, Stephen Barrett
{"title":"Maintaining the use of telehealth for delivering rehabilitation services in a regional hospital post-COVID19: Learning from telehealth delivery rates and staff experiences.","authors":"Owen Howlett, Tracy Harnetty, Stephen Barrett","doi":"10.1177/02692155251326050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo examine what delivery format had been used to facilitate rehabilitation services over recent years and to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth in the future.DesignMultiple method research approach.Setting:Outpatient rehabilitation service in a large regional hospital in Australia.Participants:Clinicians that deliver rehabilitation interventions including allied health professionals and nurses.Main measuresFirst, a retrospective audit of data examining the rate of telehealth use. Second, semi-structured focus groups with clinical staff to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth. Data were thematically analysed and mapped to a behaviour change framework.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% (n = 45,960) of rehabilitation services were delivered in-person; during peak restrictions, in-person delivery was 54% (n = 49,337). Following the ease of restrictions, 71% (n = 49,337) of the rehabilitation services were delivered in-person, 28% (n = 21,624) via phone and 1% (n = 493) via video. Telehealth use increased 11% from pre-pandemic to when restrictions were eased, driven by increased use of phone consultations. Six themes related to barriers and four themes related enablers to using telehealth were identified. Using the behaviour change framework, five interventions functions (education, training, environmental restructure, modelling and enablement) were recommended to facilitate telehealth use.ConclusionsTelehealth-delivered rehabilitation rates increased post-pandemic, primarily via phone consultations. Reported barriers and enablers highlight the need for targeted strategies, with five intervention functions identified that may support increased telehealth adoption in rehabilitation settings. Future efforts should address clinician-raised barriers to optimise telehealth integration into service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"679-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251326050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine what delivery format had been used to facilitate rehabilitation services over recent years and to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth in the future.DesignMultiple method research approach.Setting:Outpatient rehabilitation service in a large regional hospital in Australia.Participants:Clinicians that deliver rehabilitation interventions including allied health professionals and nurses.Main measuresFirst, a retrospective audit of data examining the rate of telehealth use. Second, semi-structured focus groups with clinical staff to identify barriers and enablers to using telehealth. Data were thematically analysed and mapped to a behaviour change framework.ResultsPre-pandemic, 82% (n = 45,960) of rehabilitation services were delivered in-person; during peak restrictions, in-person delivery was 54% (n = 49,337). Following the ease of restrictions, 71% (n = 49,337) of the rehabilitation services were delivered in-person, 28% (n = 21,624) via phone and 1% (n = 493) via video. Telehealth use increased 11% from pre-pandemic to when restrictions were eased, driven by increased use of phone consultations. Six themes related to barriers and four themes related enablers to using telehealth were identified. Using the behaviour change framework, five interventions functions (education, training, environmental restructure, modelling and enablement) were recommended to facilitate telehealth use.ConclusionsTelehealth-delivered rehabilitation rates increased post-pandemic, primarily via phone consultations. Reported barriers and enablers highlight the need for targeted strategies, with five intervention functions identified that may support increased telehealth adoption in rehabilitation settings. Future efforts should address clinician-raised barriers to optimise telehealth integration into service delivery.

在2019冠状病毒病后的区域医院继续使用远程医疗提供康复服务:从远程医疗提供率和工作人员经验中学习。
目的调查近年来为促进康复服务而采用的交付形式,并确定未来使用远程保健的障碍和促进因素。设计多方法研究方法。项目背景:澳大利亚某大型地区医院门诊康复中心。参与者:提供康复干预的临床医生,包括专职卫生专业人员和护士。主要措施首先,对审查远程医疗使用率的数据进行回顾性审计。第二,与临床工作人员进行半结构化焦点小组讨论,以确定使用远程保健的障碍和推动因素。对数据进行主题分析并映射到行为改变框架。结果大流行前,82% (n = 45,960)的康复服务是亲自提供的;在高峰限制期间,亲自递送的比例为54% (n = 49,337)。放宽限制后,71% (n = 49,337)的康复服务是亲自提供的,28% (n = 21,624)是通过电话提供的,1% (n = 493)是通过视频提供的。由于电话咨询的使用增加,远程医疗的使用从大流行前到放宽限制时增加了11%。确定了6个与障碍有关的主题和4个与促进使用远程保健有关的主题。利用行为改变框架,建议了五项干预职能(教育、培训、环境重组、建模和使能),以促进远程保健的使用。结论大流行后,主要通过电话咨询提高了医疗保健服务的康复率。报告的障碍和促进因素强调需要有针对性的战略,确定了五种干预功能,可以支持在康复环境中更多地采用远程保健。未来的努力应解决临床医生提出的障碍,以优化将远程保健纳入服务提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信