A cross-sectional needs assessment for a trauma-informed care curriculum for multidisciplinary healthcare providers.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dana C Ross, Kaniz Fatema Farhat, Negar Sayrafizadeh, Annie K Truuvert, Louloua Ashikhusein Waliji, Mahum Musheer, Julie Blair, Lesley Hughes, Sue MacRae, Simone N Vigod, Sophie Soklaridis, Nancy McCallum
{"title":"A cross-sectional needs assessment for a trauma-informed care curriculum for multidisciplinary healthcare providers.","authors":"Dana C Ross, Kaniz Fatema Farhat, Negar Sayrafizadeh, Annie K Truuvert, Louloua Ashikhusein Waliji, Mahum Musheer, Julie Blair, Lesley Hughes, Sue MacRae, Simone N Vigod, Sophie Soklaridis, Nancy McCallum","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12568-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma-informed care (TIC) is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma, aiming to enhance both patient outcomes and provider well-being. Given the high prevalence of trauma among individuals seeking healthcare, it is essential for healthcare providers (HCPs) to be trauma informed. However, standardized TIC curricula for training healthcare staff are lacking. This study assessed perceptions towards TIC among multidisciplinary HCPs, patients, and leadership staff at two urban hospitals in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods prospective cross-sectional study employed Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development. A needs assessment was conducted via an online questionnaire for HCPs and semi-structed interviews with individuals from the three participant groups: HCPs, patients, and leadership staff. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding TIC. Semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on TIC, including curriculum priorities and potential implementation barriers. Findings informed the development of a virtual TIC curriculum, with iterative feedback collected to refine and assess its acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 106 HCP questionnaire respondents including Medical Doctors, Social Workers and Registered Nurses, 96 (90.6%) identified as women, and 97 (91.5%) as providers of direct patient care. Despite 93 (87.7%) having prior TIC education, 77 (72.6%) reported low confidence in applying TIC knowledge in clinical practice. Key perceived challenges to TIC training implementation included time constraints and lack of standardization across disciplines. A multimedia, self-paced course was the preferred solution. Thematic analysis of interviews with 28 participants (10 HCPs, 10 patients, 8 leadership staff) revealed six major themes: healthcare interactions, TIC implementation, training needs, system level barriers, curriculum preferences, and systems level improvements. Participants underscored the risk of re-traumatization to patients in healthcare settings without TIC and emphasized the need for universal TIC training for all staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed a strong interest in a TIC course for multidisciplinary HCPs, supports the translation of knowledge into practice and incorporates a focus on cultural humility. Integrating insights from key stakeholders in this needs assessment phase resulted in the development of a TIC curriculum inclusive of diverse voices and viewpoints and strengthened the understanding of contextual factors that will support effective TIC implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12568-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma-informed care (TIC) is a framework that recognizes the pervasive impact of trauma, aiming to enhance both patient outcomes and provider well-being. Given the high prevalence of trauma among individuals seeking healthcare, it is essential for healthcare providers (HCPs) to be trauma informed. However, standardized TIC curricula for training healthcare staff are lacking. This study assessed perceptions towards TIC among multidisciplinary HCPs, patients, and leadership staff at two urban hospitals in Canada.

Methods: This mixed-methods prospective cross-sectional study employed Kern's six-step approach for curriculum development. A needs assessment was conducted via an online questionnaire for HCPs and semi-structed interviews with individuals from the three participant groups: HCPs, patients, and leadership staff. The questionnaire assessed knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding TIC. Semi-structured interviews explored perspectives on TIC, including curriculum priorities and potential implementation barriers. Findings informed the development of a virtual TIC curriculum, with iterative feedback collected to refine and assess its acceptability.

Results: Among 106 HCP questionnaire respondents including Medical Doctors, Social Workers and Registered Nurses, 96 (90.6%) identified as women, and 97 (91.5%) as providers of direct patient care. Despite 93 (87.7%) having prior TIC education, 77 (72.6%) reported low confidence in applying TIC knowledge in clinical practice. Key perceived challenges to TIC training implementation included time constraints and lack of standardization across disciplines. A multimedia, self-paced course was the preferred solution. Thematic analysis of interviews with 28 participants (10 HCPs, 10 patients, 8 leadership staff) revealed six major themes: healthcare interactions, TIC implementation, training needs, system level barriers, curriculum preferences, and systems level improvements. Participants underscored the risk of re-traumatization to patients in healthcare settings without TIC and emphasized the need for universal TIC training for all staff.

Conclusion: This study revealed a strong interest in a TIC course for multidisciplinary HCPs, supports the translation of knowledge into practice and incorporates a focus on cultural humility. Integrating insights from key stakeholders in this needs assessment phase resulted in the development of a TIC curriculum inclusive of diverse voices and viewpoints and strengthened the understanding of contextual factors that will support effective TIC implementation.

多学科医疗保健提供者创伤知情护理课程的横断面需求评估。
背景:创伤知情护理(TIC)是一个框架,认识到创伤的普遍影响,旨在提高患者的结果和提供者的福祉。鉴于在寻求医疗保健的个人创伤的高患病率,它是必不可少的医疗保健提供者(HCPs)创伤知情。然而,缺乏用于培训保健人员的标准化TIC课程。本研究评估了加拿大两家城市医院的多学科医护人员、患者和领导人员对TIC的看法。方法:这项混合方法的前瞻性横断面研究采用了Kern的课程开发六步法。需求评估是通过对医护人员的在线问卷调查和对来自三个参与者群体(医护人员、患者和领导人员)的半结构化访谈进行的。该问卷评估了有关TIC的知识、技能和态度。半结构化访谈探讨了TIC的观点,包括课程重点和潜在的实施障碍。调查结果为开发虚拟议会课程提供了参考,并不断收集反馈意见,以完善和评估其可接受性。结果:在包括医生、社工和注册护士在内的106名HCP问卷调查对象中,96名(90.6%)为女性,97名(91.5%)为直接提供患者护理的人员。尽管93人(87.7%)曾接受过TIC教育,但77人(72.6%)表示对临床应用TIC知识缺乏信心。议会培训实施的主要挑战包括时间限制和缺乏跨学科的标准化。一个多媒体,自定进度的课程是首选的解决方案。对28名参与者(10名医护人员、10名患者、8名领导人员)的访谈进行专题分析,揭示了6个主要主题:医疗保健互动、TIC实施、培训需求、系统层面障碍、课程偏好和系统层面改进。与会者强调,在没有进行TIC治疗的医疗机构中,病人有再次遭受创伤的风险,并强调需要对所有工作人员进行普遍的TIC培训。结论:本研究揭示了对多学科HCPs的TIC课程的强烈兴趣,支持将知识转化为实践,并将重点放在文化谦逊上。在这一需求评估阶段,整合主要利益相关者的见解导致了议会课程的发展,包括不同的声音和观点,并加强了对支持有效实施议会的背景因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信