Influence of patient demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth: a pilot study in the Australian public dental system.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Y Alfaisal, O A Peters, G Idris, S Zafar, C I Peters
{"title":"Influence of patient demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth: a pilot study in the Australian public dental system.","authors":"Y Alfaisal, O A Peters, G Idris, S Zafar, C I Peters","doi":"10.1111/adj.13069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Socio-economic status influences treatment decisions. This influence remains uncovered in teeth with painful pulpitis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the influence of patients' demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of adult patients who received extraction, root canal treatment and vital pulp therapy in public sector dental care were categorized. Correlation of patient age, gender and socio-economic status with rendered treatments was investigated. Patients' socio-economic status was determined using their postcode's Socio-Economic Indices for Areas (SEIFA) scores; a high score indicates higher status. Three groups of n = 25 patients per treatment were randomly selected after applying the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed using chi-square test, One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant correlation between patient age or gender and treatment performed (P = 0.250, P = 0.683). SEIFA scores were higher for vital pulp therapy, then root canal treatments and lowest for extraction; however, no significant association existed between patients' socio-economic status and treatment type (P = 0.210). A formal diagnosis was not documented in 8% of vital pulp therapies, 28% of root canal treatments, and 64% of extraction cases. Vital pulp therapy was never offered in root canal treatment or extraction groups. Pulp exposure guided vital pulp treatments, while patient preference drove half of root canal treatment and extraction choices.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients age and gender did not affect treatment decisions. Socio-economic status might influence treatment decisions in painful permanent teeth. The service setting appears to have a major impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":8593,"journal":{"name":"Australian dental journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.13069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Socio-economic status influences treatment decisions. This influence remains uncovered in teeth with painful pulpitis.

Aims: To investigate the influence of patients' demographics and socio-economic status on treatment choices for permanent mature teeth with painful vital teeth.

Methods: Records of adult patients who received extraction, root canal treatment and vital pulp therapy in public sector dental care were categorized. Correlation of patient age, gender and socio-economic status with rendered treatments was investigated. Patients' socio-economic status was determined using their postcode's Socio-Economic Indices for Areas (SEIFA) scores; a high score indicates higher status. Three groups of n = 25 patients per treatment were randomly selected after applying the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed using chi-square test, One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: There was no significant correlation between patient age or gender and treatment performed (P = 0.250, P = 0.683). SEIFA scores were higher for vital pulp therapy, then root canal treatments and lowest for extraction; however, no significant association existed between patients' socio-economic status and treatment type (P = 0.210). A formal diagnosis was not documented in 8% of vital pulp therapies, 28% of root canal treatments, and 64% of extraction cases. Vital pulp therapy was never offered in root canal treatment or extraction groups. Pulp exposure guided vital pulp treatments, while patient preference drove half of root canal treatment and extraction choices.

Conclusions: Patients age and gender did not affect treatment decisions. Socio-economic status might influence treatment decisions in painful permanent teeth. The service setting appears to have a major impact.

患者人口统计和社会经济地位对治疗选择的影响恒成熟牙与疼痛的重要牙齿:在澳大利亚公共牙科系统的试点研究。
引言:社会经济地位影响治疗决策。这种影响在牙髓炎疼痛的牙齿中仍然存在。目的:探讨患者人口统计学和社会经济状况对恒成熟牙伴痛牙治疗选择的影响。方法:对在公立牙科医院接受拔牙、根管治疗和重要牙髓治疗的成年患者的病历进行分类。研究了患者年龄、性别和社会经济地位与治疗的相关性。采用邮政编码地区社会经济指数(SEIFA)评分确定患者的社会经济地位;分数越高,地位越高。应用纳入标准后,随机选择三组,每组25例患者。数据分析采用卡方检验、单因素方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:患者年龄、性别与所接受治疗无显著相关(P = 0.250, P = 0.683)。重要牙髓治疗的SEIFA评分较高,其次是根管治疗,拔牙治疗的SEIFA评分最低;然而,患者的社会经济地位与治疗类型之间不存在显著相关性(P = 0.210)。8%的重要牙髓治疗、28%的根管治疗和64%的拔牙病例未记录正式诊断。在根管治疗组或拔牙组中从未进行过生命髓治疗。牙髓暴露指导重要的牙髓治疗,而患者偏好驱动一半的根管治疗和拔牙选择。结论:患者的年龄和性别不影响治疗决策。社会经济地位可能会影响恒牙疼痛的治疗决定。服务设置似乎有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian dental journal
Australian dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Dental Journal provides a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dentistry, promoting the discipline of dentistry in Australia and throughout the world. It comprises peer-reviewed research articles as its core material, supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信