Family Peace of Mind of Individuals Over 65 Years of Age With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1111/jep.70063

Emre Birinci, Ceyda Bayram, Ayşe Özkaraman

{"title":"Family Peace of Mind of Individuals Over 65 Years of Age With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Emre Birinci, Ceyda Bayram, Ayşe Özkaraman","doi":"10.1111/jep.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to assess the level of family peace among people over 65 who have chronic diseases and to look at the level of peace in relation to specific factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 July and 31 October 2023 in Internal Medicine policlinics and clinics of a hospital in Eskişehir/Türkiye. The data were collected using the ‘Introduction Form’, ‘Self-Efficacy Scale’ and ‘Family Peace Scale’. While the data were given in the form of number, percentage, mean and percantage, Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> and Kruskal–Wallis <i>T</i> tests and Spearman's correlation analysis were applied in statistical analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The total mean score of the family peace scale was 64.82 ± 9.041, the deep wear sub-dimension score was 34.11 ± 5.66, and the general contentment sub-dimension score was 30.71 ± 4.64. Age of the patients showed a significantly favourable association with the overall family peace score (<i>r</i> = 0.149; <i>p</i> = 0.019) (Table 4). Individual with dependents had statistically significantly lower total and sub-dimension scores of family peace (<i>p</i> = 0.004, <i>p</i> = 0.030, <i>p</i> = 0.007, respectively). It was found that family peace increased significantly in the positive direction as the level of self-efficacy of the patients increased (<i>r</i> = 0.389, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Family peace of mind is strongly associated with age, dependents and self-efficacy perceptions of individuals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the level of family peace among people over 65 who have chronic diseases and to look at the level of peace in relation to specific factors.

Method

This cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 July and 31 October 2023 in Internal Medicine policlinics and clinics of a hospital in Eskişehir/Türkiye. The data were collected using the ‘Introduction Form’, ‘Self-Efficacy Scale’ and ‘Family Peace Scale’. While the data were given in the form of number, percentage, mean and percantage, Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis T tests and Spearman's correlation analysis were applied in statistical analysis.

Results

The total mean score of the family peace scale was 64.82 ± 9.041, the deep wear sub-dimension score was 34.11 ± 5.66, and the general contentment sub-dimension score was 30.71 ± 4.64. Age of the patients showed a significantly favourable association with the overall family peace score (r = 0.149; p = 0.019) (Table 4). Individual with dependents had statistically significantly lower total and sub-dimension scores of family peace (p = 0.004, p = 0.030, p = 0.007, respectively). It was found that family peace increased significantly in the positive direction as the level of self-efficacy of the patients increased (r = 0.389, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Family peace of mind is strongly associated with age, dependents and self-efficacy perceptions of individuals.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

65岁以上慢性病患者的家庭心理安宁：一项横断面研究

目的本研究的目的是评估65岁以上慢性病患者的家庭安宁水平，并研究安宁水平与特定因素的关系。方法本横断面研究于2023年7月1日至10月31日在eskiehir / trkiye一家医院的内科门诊和诊所进行。数据采用“自我介绍表”、“自我效能感量表”和“家庭安宁量表”收集。数据以数字、百分比、平均值、百分比的形式给出，统计分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis T检验和Spearman相关分析。结果家庭安宁量表总平均得分为64.82±9.041分，深度磨损子维度得分为34.11±5.66分，一般满意子维度得分为30.71±4.64分。患者的年龄与家庭安宁总分有显著的正相关(r = 0.149；p = 0.019)（表4）。有家属个体的家庭安宁总分和分维度得分均显著低于有家属个体（p = 0.004, p = 0.030, p = 0.007）。结果发现，随着患者自我效能感水平的提高，家庭安宁度正向显著增加（r = 0.389, p < 0.001）。结论家庭心理安宁与年龄、被赡养人和个体自我效能感有显著相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 医学-卫生保健

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

4.20%

发文量

143

审稿时长

3-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.