Predictive modeling of crumb rubber-modified mortar: insights from ANN, LR, RF, and M5P methods

Q2 Engineering
Parikshit Hurukadli, Bhupender Parashar, Bishnu Kant Shukla, Pushpendra Kumar Sharma, Parveen Sihag
{"title":"Predictive modeling of crumb rubber-modified mortar: insights from ANN, LR, RF, and M5P methods","authors":"Parikshit Hurukadli,&nbsp;Bhupender Parashar,&nbsp;Bishnu Kant Shukla,&nbsp;Pushpendra Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Parveen Sihag","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01270-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the feasibility of using crumb rubber as a partial sand replacement in cement mortar, aiming to address environmental challenges associated with tire waste while contributing to sustainable construction practices. The experimental phase involved preparing cement mortar samples with varying percentages of crumb rubber and analyzing the resulting compressive strength. Crumb rubber substitution at levels of up to 7.5% in a 1:5 to 1:6 mix proportion resulted in practical compressive strengths between 2–6 MPa, suitable for certain applications in construction. The compressive strength reduction associated with increased crumb rubber was offset by improved durability characteristics, including enhanced ductility and energy absorption. To model and predict compressive strength effectively, four machine learning approaches—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Linear Regression (LR), and M5P tree—were implemented. The ANN model emerged as the most effective with respect to testing data, with performance metrics including Coefficient of Correlation (CC) values of 0.9998, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values 0.9959, least Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.2125, least Scattering Index (SI) of 0.041 and least Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.1693. Sensitivity analysis further highlighted crumb rubber percentage as a critical factor influencing compressive strength, underscoring the potential for targeted optimization. The findings suggest that incorporating crumb rubber in mortar can balance sustainability goals with material performance, especially when paired with advanced predictive modeling. Future work is recommended to optimize formulations by varying water-cement ratios or introducing plasticizers to enhance the strength of rubber-modified mortar. This research highlights a promising pathway for reusing waste materials in construction, contributing to both environmental and structural engineering fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 4","pages":"1621 - 1633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01270-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of using crumb rubber as a partial sand replacement in cement mortar, aiming to address environmental challenges associated with tire waste while contributing to sustainable construction practices. The experimental phase involved preparing cement mortar samples with varying percentages of crumb rubber and analyzing the resulting compressive strength. Crumb rubber substitution at levels of up to 7.5% in a 1:5 to 1:6 mix proportion resulted in practical compressive strengths between 2–6 MPa, suitable for certain applications in construction. The compressive strength reduction associated with increased crumb rubber was offset by improved durability characteristics, including enhanced ductility and energy absorption. To model and predict compressive strength effectively, four machine learning approaches—Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Linear Regression (LR), and M5P tree—were implemented. The ANN model emerged as the most effective with respect to testing data, with performance metrics including Coefficient of Correlation (CC) values of 0.9998, Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values 0.9959, least Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.2125, least Scattering Index (SI) of 0.041 and least Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.1693. Sensitivity analysis further highlighted crumb rubber percentage as a critical factor influencing compressive strength, underscoring the potential for targeted optimization. The findings suggest that incorporating crumb rubber in mortar can balance sustainability goals with material performance, especially when paired with advanced predictive modeling. Future work is recommended to optimize formulations by varying water-cement ratios or introducing plasticizers to enhance the strength of rubber-modified mortar. This research highlights a promising pathway for reusing waste materials in construction, contributing to both environmental and structural engineering fields.

碎屑橡胶改性砂浆的预测建模:ANN、LR、RF 和 M5P 方法的启示
本研究调查了在水泥砂浆中使用橡胶屑替代部分沙子的可行性,旨在应对与轮胎废弃物相关的环境挑战,同时为可持续建筑实践做出贡献。实验阶段包括制备含有不同比例橡胶屑的水泥砂浆样品,并分析由此产生的抗压强度。在 1:5 至 1:6 的混合比例中,以最高 7.5% 的比例替代轮胎橡胶,可获得 2-6 兆帕的实际抗压强度,适合建筑中的某些应用。由于增加了橡胶屑,抗压强度有所降低,但耐久性得到了提高,包括延展性和能量吸收能力都得到了增强。为了有效地建模和预测抗压强度,采用了四种机器学习方法--人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、线性回归(LR)和 M5P 树。就测试数据而言,人工神经网络模型最为有效,其性能指标包括相关系数 (CC) 值 0.9998、纳什-苏克里夫效率 (NSE) 值 0.9959、最小均方根误差 (RMSE) 0.2125、最小散射指数 (SI) 0.041 和最小平均绝对误差 (MAE) 0.1693。灵敏度分析进一步突出了碎屑橡胶百分比是影响抗压强度的关键因素,强调了有针对性优化的潜力。研究结果表明,在砂浆中加入橡胶屑可以在可持续发展目标和材料性能之间取得平衡,尤其是在与先进的预测建模相结合时。建议今后开展工作,通过改变水灰比或引入增塑剂来优化配方,以提高橡胶改性砂浆的强度。这项研究为建筑中废弃材料的再利用开辟了一条前景广阔的道路,为环境和结构工程领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信