Machine learning based prediction model for the compressive strength of fly ash reinforced concrete: an exploration of varying cement replacements and water-cement ratios
{"title":"Machine learning based prediction model for the compressive strength of fly ash reinforced concrete: an exploration of varying cement replacements and water-cement ratios","authors":"Rohit Kumar Mishra, Arun Kumar Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01266-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores the effect of fly ash replacement (0–50%) and various water-cement (W/C) ratios on the compressive strength of concrete. Experiments were conducted to evaluate compressive strength at different curing times (7, 28, 90, and 120 days) and W/C ratios (0.35, 0.45, 0.50). The results indicate that fly ash replacement reduces early-age compressive strength, with 50% fly ash mixes achieving around 12 MPa at 7 days compared to over 30 MPa for 0% fly ash, due to slower pozzolanic reactions. SVM-RBF, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Linear Regression based prediction models of compressive strength were developed. The performance of models was assessed using key performance metrics like MAE, MSE, RMSE, MSLE, RMSLE, R², MAPE, Willmott’s Index of Agreement, Mielke & Berry Index, and Legates & McCabe’s Index alongside Taylor diagrams, which revealed that SVM-RBF was the most reliable model, providing the best accuracy in both training (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.991) and testing phases (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.958). Sensitivity analysis indicated that curing days and water-cement ratio were the most influential factors on compressive strength, with curing days showing the highest normalized sensitivity index. Monotonicity analysis revealed optimal ranges for fly ash (~ 20%) and W/C ratio (~ 0.40) for maximizing compressive strength, with strength diminishing beyond these values due to increased porosity. The findings underscore the significance of fly ash content and W/C ratio in optimizing concrete strength, with machine learning providing valuable insights into predicting and understanding the behavior of concrete mixtures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 4","pages":"1543 - 1564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01266-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research explores the effect of fly ash replacement (0–50%) and various water-cement (W/C) ratios on the compressive strength of concrete. Experiments were conducted to evaluate compressive strength at different curing times (7, 28, 90, and 120 days) and W/C ratios (0.35, 0.45, 0.50). The results indicate that fly ash replacement reduces early-age compressive strength, with 50% fly ash mixes achieving around 12 MPa at 7 days compared to over 30 MPa for 0% fly ash, due to slower pozzolanic reactions. SVM-RBF, Random Forest, XGBoost, and Linear Regression based prediction models of compressive strength were developed. The performance of models was assessed using key performance metrics like MAE, MSE, RMSE, MSLE, RMSLE, R², MAPE, Willmott’s Index of Agreement, Mielke & Berry Index, and Legates & McCabe’s Index alongside Taylor diagrams, which revealed that SVM-RBF was the most reliable model, providing the best accuracy in both training (R2 = 0.991) and testing phases (R2 = 0.958). Sensitivity analysis indicated that curing days and water-cement ratio were the most influential factors on compressive strength, with curing days showing the highest normalized sensitivity index. Monotonicity analysis revealed optimal ranges for fly ash (~ 20%) and W/C ratio (~ 0.40) for maximizing compressive strength, with strength diminishing beyond these values due to increased porosity. The findings underscore the significance of fly ash content and W/C ratio in optimizing concrete strength, with machine learning providing valuable insights into predicting and understanding the behavior of concrete mixtures.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.