Optimization of time–cost–quality-CO2 emission trade-off problems via super oppositional TLBO algorithm

Q2 Engineering
Mohammad Azim Eirgash
{"title":"Optimization of time–cost–quality-CO2 emission trade-off problems via super oppositional TLBO algorithm","authors":"Mohammad Azim Eirgash","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01282-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm is widely recognized for its efficiency and effectiveness in solving optimization problems. However, it often encounters challenges with premature convergence, leading to local optimal solutions. To address this limitation, this study introduces an enhanced variant of TLBO, denoted as super oppositional teaching–learning-based optimization (SOTLBO) algorithm. This enhancement introduces a novel super opposition learning (SOL) strategy, which retains superior candidate solutions by simultaneously evaluating an individual and its corresponding opposite individual. The proposed SOTLBO is applied to a time–cost–quality-CO<sub>2</sub> emission (TCQCE) trade-off problem involving a 33 activity project that considers all logical dependencies among activities. Results demonstrate that SOTLBO achieves faster convergence and higher-quality optimal solutions. To assess the algorithm’s effectiveness, its performance is compared with well-established algorithms: slime mold algorithm opposition tournament mutation (SMOATM), golden ratio sampling based random oppositional aquila optimization (GRS-ROAO), and plain TLBO algroithms. Statistical analysis highlights that SOTLBO outperforms these algorithms, achieving the highest hyper-volume (HV) value of 0.889 and the suitable mean ideal distance (MID) and spread (SP) values of 1.918 and 0.382, respectively, for the 33 activity project. These findings highlight SOTLBO’s superior ability to enhance diversity and ensure more uniform solution distributions compared to other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 4","pages":"1743 - 1755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01282-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm is widely recognized for its efficiency and effectiveness in solving optimization problems. However, it often encounters challenges with premature convergence, leading to local optimal solutions. To address this limitation, this study introduces an enhanced variant of TLBO, denoted as super oppositional teaching–learning-based optimization (SOTLBO) algorithm. This enhancement introduces a novel super opposition learning (SOL) strategy, which retains superior candidate solutions by simultaneously evaluating an individual and its corresponding opposite individual. The proposed SOTLBO is applied to a time–cost–quality-CO2 emission (TCQCE) trade-off problem involving a 33 activity project that considers all logical dependencies among activities. Results demonstrate that SOTLBO achieves faster convergence and higher-quality optimal solutions. To assess the algorithm’s effectiveness, its performance is compared with well-established algorithms: slime mold algorithm opposition tournament mutation (SMOATM), golden ratio sampling based random oppositional aquila optimization (GRS-ROAO), and plain TLBO algroithms. Statistical analysis highlights that SOTLBO outperforms these algorithms, achieving the highest hyper-volume (HV) value of 0.889 and the suitable mean ideal distance (MID) and spread (SP) values of 1.918 and 0.382, respectively, for the 33 activity project. These findings highlight SOTLBO’s superior ability to enhance diversity and ensure more uniform solution distributions compared to other multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.

Abstract Image

基于教学的优化算法(TLBO)因其在解决优化问题方面的高效性和有效性而得到广泛认可。然而,它经常遇到过早收敛的挑战,导致局部最优解的出现。为了解决这一局限性,本研究引入了 TLBO 的增强变体,称为基于教学的超级对立优化算法(SOTLBO)。这种增强型算法引入了一种新颖的超级对立学习(SOL)策略,通过同时评估一个个体及其对应的对立个体来保留优秀的候选解决方案。所提出的 SOTLBO 被应用于时间成本-质量-二氧化碳排放(TCQCE)权衡问题,该问题涉及 33 个活动项目,考虑了活动之间的所有逻辑依赖关系。结果表明,SOTLBO 的收敛速度更快,最优解的质量更高。为了评估该算法的有效性,我们将其性能与以下成熟算法进行了比较:粘菌算法对立锦标赛突变(SMOATM)、基于黄金比率采样的随机对立水草优化(GRS-ROAO)和普通 TLBO 算法。统计分析表明,SOTLBO 优于这些算法,在 33 个活动项目中,SOTLBO 获得了最高的超体积 (HV) 值 0.889,合适的平均理想距离 (MID) 和传播 (SP) 值分别为 1.918 和 0.382。与其他多目标进化算法相比,这些发现凸显了 SOTLBO 在增强多样性和确保解决方案分布更加均匀方面的卓越能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信