{"title":"Cruciform steel column: FEM simulation and experimental approach to evaluate the strength and buckling behaviour","authors":"P. Arun Kumar, B. Anupriya","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01283-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>I-section is the most common structural member that is frequently utilized as a column element because of its serviceability and efficient load transfer. Due to its larger axial capacity and symmetrical geometry, the cruciform section is a potential substitute to the conventional column section. The two primary factors that determine a column’s capacity are the slenderness ratio and the second moment of inertia. The axial capacity of a column is effectively increased by symmetrical cruciform column sections, which have the identical second moment of inertia on both axes. In this work, the analytical examination utilising the FEM is contrasted with the experimental approach to carry out an extensive assessment for comparing Cruciform column sections with conventional steel sections. Analytical and experimental findings are compared with theoretical results to provide an adequate evaluation. The general performance and buckling properties of the column are evaluated in this study. Two unique cruciform column sections are reviewed and compared with the standard column section. In terms of performance, cruciform column sections outperform regular column sections. It is made evident that the flanged cruciform column section performs well when used in the place of heavier steel column sections, which lowers the overall sectional weight as well as the cost.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 4","pages":"1757 - 1765"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01283-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I-section is the most common structural member that is frequently utilized as a column element because of its serviceability and efficient load transfer. Due to its larger axial capacity and symmetrical geometry, the cruciform section is a potential substitute to the conventional column section. The two primary factors that determine a column’s capacity are the slenderness ratio and the second moment of inertia. The axial capacity of a column is effectively increased by symmetrical cruciform column sections, which have the identical second moment of inertia on both axes. In this work, the analytical examination utilising the FEM is contrasted with the experimental approach to carry out an extensive assessment for comparing Cruciform column sections with conventional steel sections. Analytical and experimental findings are compared with theoretical results to provide an adequate evaluation. The general performance and buckling properties of the column are evaluated in this study. Two unique cruciform column sections are reviewed and compared with the standard column section. In terms of performance, cruciform column sections outperform regular column sections. It is made evident that the flanged cruciform column section performs well when used in the place of heavier steel column sections, which lowers the overall sectional weight as well as the cost.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.