Pediatric mature B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma in India: A retrospective multicenter pooled analysis of treatment approaches and outcomes

Nirmalya Roy Moulik , Sameer Bakhshi , Shripad Banavali , Venkatraman Radhakrishnan , Amita Trehan , Anshul Gupta , Niharendu Ghara , Rachna Seth , Ramandeep Singh Arora
{"title":"Pediatric mature B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma in India: A retrospective multicenter pooled analysis of treatment approaches and outcomes","authors":"Nirmalya Roy Moulik ,&nbsp;Sameer Bakhshi ,&nbsp;Shripad Banavali ,&nbsp;Venkatraman Radhakrishnan ,&nbsp;Amita Trehan ,&nbsp;Anshul Gupta ,&nbsp;Niharendu Ghara ,&nbsp;Rachna Seth ,&nbsp;Ramandeep Singh Arora","doi":"10.1016/j.phoj.2024.11.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Published data on outcomes of pediatric mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) from India is limited and difficult to interpret due to small sample size and non-uniform treatment protocols. This study aims to do a pooled analysis of published patient data from multiple centers across India to provide a clearer understanding of survival rates and treatment-related toxicities with respect to the treatment protocols in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pooled analysis was conducted of patient data from 505 children with mature B-NHL, including Burkitt lymphoma (n = 395), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 52), and other subtypes (n = 58), treated from 2000 to 2022 at seven major cancer centers in India. Outcomes assessed were grade 3/4 toxicities, toxic deaths, relapse/progression, and survival rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most patients (401/505) presented with advanced disease; bone marrow and CNS involvement were observed in 13.9 % and 6.9 % of cases, respectively. Treatment protocols primarily included LMB (n = 208), BFM (n = 191), and MCP (n = 61). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 79.2 % of patients, with higher rates observed with LMB protocol (92.1 %) compared to BFM (70.8 %) and MCP (70.1 %) (p &lt; 0.001). Toxic death rates were similar across protocols. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at a median follow-up of 17 months were 69.4 ± 2.2 % and 64.9 ± 2.2 %, respectively, with no significant differences in relapse/progression rates or stage-specific OS between protocols (p = 0.28 and 0.51).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pooled analysis shows that although treatment-related toxicities differ by protocol, overall survival outcomes were similar across the LMB, BFM, and MCP regimens, despite being much lower than those reported from high income countries. Uniform standardized protocols may further improve outcomes for pediatric B-NHL in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101004,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468124524003383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Published data on outcomes of pediatric mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) from India is limited and difficult to interpret due to small sample size and non-uniform treatment protocols. This study aims to do a pooled analysis of published patient data from multiple centers across India to provide a clearer understanding of survival rates and treatment-related toxicities with respect to the treatment protocols in this population.

Methods

A pooled analysis was conducted of patient data from 505 children with mature B-NHL, including Burkitt lymphoma (n = 395), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n = 52), and other subtypes (n = 58), treated from 2000 to 2022 at seven major cancer centers in India. Outcomes assessed were grade 3/4 toxicities, toxic deaths, relapse/progression, and survival rates.

Results

Most patients (401/505) presented with advanced disease; bone marrow and CNS involvement were observed in 13.9 % and 6.9 % of cases, respectively. Treatment protocols primarily included LMB (n = 208), BFM (n = 191), and MCP (n = 61). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 79.2 % of patients, with higher rates observed with LMB protocol (92.1 %) compared to BFM (70.8 %) and MCP (70.1 %) (p < 0.001). Toxic death rates were similar across protocols. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at a median follow-up of 17 months were 69.4 ± 2.2 % and 64.9 ± 2.2 %, respectively, with no significant differences in relapse/progression rates or stage-specific OS between protocols (p = 0.28 and 0.51).

Conclusions

This pooled analysis shows that although treatment-related toxicities differ by protocol, overall survival outcomes were similar across the LMB, BFM, and MCP regimens, despite being much lower than those reported from high income countries. Uniform standardized protocols may further improve outcomes for pediatric B-NHL in India.
印度儿童成熟b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤:治疗方法和结果的回顾性多中心汇总分析
背景:印度儿童成熟b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(B-NHL)预后的已发表数据有限,且由于样本量小和治疗方案不统一,难以解释。本研究旨在对印度多个中心发表的患者数据进行汇总分析,以便更清楚地了解该人群中治疗方案的存活率和治疗相关毒性。方法对2000年至2022年在印度7个主要癌症中心治疗的505例成熟B-NHL患儿的患者数据进行汇总分析,包括Burkitt淋巴瘤(n = 395)、弥漫大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL, n = 52)和其他亚型(n = 58)。评估的结果是3/4级毒性、中毒性死亡、复发/进展和生存率。结果401/505例患者以晚期疾病为主;累及骨髓和中枢神经系统分别占13.9%和6.9%。治疗方案主要包括LMB (n = 208)、BFM (n = 191)和MCP (n = 61)。79.2%的患者报告了3/4级毒性,LMB方案的发生率(92.1%)高于BFM(70.8%)和MCP (70.1%) (p <;0.001)。不同方案的毒性死亡率相似。中位随访17个月的总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)分别为69.4±2.2%和64.9±2.2%,两种方案在复发/进展率或分期特异性OS方面无显著差异(p = 0.28和0.51)。该综合分析表明,尽管治疗相关毒性因方案而异,但LMB、BFM和MCP方案的总体生存结果相似,尽管远低于高收入国家报告的结果。统一的标准化方案可能进一步改善印度儿童B-NHL的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信