Former food and cocoa bean shells in early-lactating cows on a herbage-based diet: effects on ruminal fermentation and blood metabolites

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
A.-M. Reiche , M. Tretola , L. Eggerschwiler , L. Pinotti , F. Dohme-Meier
{"title":"Former food and cocoa bean shells in early-lactating cows on a herbage-based diet: effects on ruminal fermentation and blood metabolites","authors":"A.-M. Reiche ,&nbsp;M. Tretola ,&nbsp;L. Eggerschwiler ,&nbsp;L. Pinotti ,&nbsp;F. Dohme-Meier","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rising food security concerns are driving the livestock sector to explore alternatives to cereal grains, like by−products from the food industry, but their effect on animals needs to be studied. The study assessed the impact of replacing 55% cereal grains with former food products (<strong>FFP</strong>) on ruminal fermentation, ruminal methane production, and blood metabolites, with or without cocoa bean shell (<strong>CBS</strong>) supplementation. We conducted a first (spring, <strong>E1</strong>) and a second (fall, <strong>E2</strong>) experiment, each with 17 early-lactating Holstein and Red Holstein cows. Each experiment lasted 6 weeks, including a 3-week adaptation and a 3-week experimental period. In each experiment, the animals were fed freshly cut grass as a basal diet and were balanced for milk yield, parity, and days in milk and assigned to three concentrate types (<strong>CCT</strong>): (i) a control concentrate (<strong>CON</strong>), (ii) a concentrate consisting of 55% FFP (<strong>FFP-</strong>), and (iii) an FFP concentrate that included an additional 5% CBS (<strong>FFP+</strong> ). Feed intake and milk production were recorded daily during the 3-week sampling period; blood serum and ruminal fluid samples were collected twice, at the end of the adaptation and experimental periods. Statistical analyses were conducted on data from both experiments. DM, herbage, and most nutrient intakes were greater in E2 than in E1, probably because of seasonal changes in herbage quality. In E1, CON cows had lower DM intake (<strong>DMI</strong>) than FFP- cows, whereas in E2, CON cows had greater DMI than FFP+ cows. Across experiments, FFP- and FFP+ cows had greater water-soluble carbohydrates and fat and lower starch intakes than CON cows. The energy-corrected milk yield was greater in E1 than in E2 and unaffected by CCT. Irrespective of the experiment, the CON cows had the greatest, FFP- intermediate and FFP+ lowest milk lactose percentages and FFP+ cows had greater milk fat percentages than CON cows. The mean and maximum reticular pH were lower for CON than for FFP- cows in E1 and were unaffected by CCT in E2. Irrespective of the experiment, acetate proportions in ruminal fluid of CON cows were lower than those of FFP- and FFP+ cows. Methane yield was greater in E2 than in E1 and unaffected by CCT. Serum albumin, non-esterified fatty acids and glucose levels varied by CCT in E2, but not in E1. Combining FFP and CBS with herbage could help increase the sustainability of early-lactating dairy cow nutrition without compromising health, but results need future corroboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 4","pages":"Article 101477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731125000606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising food security concerns are driving the livestock sector to explore alternatives to cereal grains, like by−products from the food industry, but their effect on animals needs to be studied. The study assessed the impact of replacing 55% cereal grains with former food products (FFP) on ruminal fermentation, ruminal methane production, and blood metabolites, with or without cocoa bean shell (CBS) supplementation. We conducted a first (spring, E1) and a second (fall, E2) experiment, each with 17 early-lactating Holstein and Red Holstein cows. Each experiment lasted 6 weeks, including a 3-week adaptation and a 3-week experimental period. In each experiment, the animals were fed freshly cut grass as a basal diet and were balanced for milk yield, parity, and days in milk and assigned to three concentrate types (CCT): (i) a control concentrate (CON), (ii) a concentrate consisting of 55% FFP (FFP-), and (iii) an FFP concentrate that included an additional 5% CBS (FFP+ ). Feed intake and milk production were recorded daily during the 3-week sampling period; blood serum and ruminal fluid samples were collected twice, at the end of the adaptation and experimental periods. Statistical analyses were conducted on data from both experiments. DM, herbage, and most nutrient intakes were greater in E2 than in E1, probably because of seasonal changes in herbage quality. In E1, CON cows had lower DM intake (DMI) than FFP- cows, whereas in E2, CON cows had greater DMI than FFP+ cows. Across experiments, FFP- and FFP+ cows had greater water-soluble carbohydrates and fat and lower starch intakes than CON cows. The energy-corrected milk yield was greater in E1 than in E2 and unaffected by CCT. Irrespective of the experiment, the CON cows had the greatest, FFP- intermediate and FFP+ lowest milk lactose percentages and FFP+ cows had greater milk fat percentages than CON cows. The mean and maximum reticular pH were lower for CON than for FFP- cows in E1 and were unaffected by CCT in E2. Irrespective of the experiment, acetate proportions in ruminal fluid of CON cows were lower than those of FFP- and FFP+ cows. Methane yield was greater in E2 than in E1 and unaffected by CCT. Serum albumin, non-esterified fatty acids and glucose levels varied by CCT in E2, but not in E1. Combining FFP and CBS with herbage could help increase the sustainability of early-lactating dairy cow nutrition without compromising health, but results need future corroboration.
草料基础饲粮对泌乳早期奶牛瘤胃发酵和血液代谢产物的影响
日益严重的粮食安全问题促使畜牧业探索谷物的替代品,如食品工业的副产品,但它们对动物的影响需要研究。该研究评估了在添加或不添加可可豆壳(CBS)的情况下,用原食品(FFP)替代55%谷物对瘤胃发酵、瘤胃甲烷产量和血液代谢物的影响。第1期(春季,E1)和第2期(秋季,E2)试验分别选用17头泌乳早期荷斯坦奶牛和红荷斯坦奶牛。每个试验为期6周,其中预试期3周,正试期3周。在每个试验中,动物以新割的草为基础饲粮,根据产奶量、胎次和泌乳天数进行平衡,并被分配到三种浓缩物类型(CCT):(i)对照浓缩物(CON), (ii)含55% FFP的浓缩物(FFP-), (iii)含5% CBS的FFP浓缩物(FFP+)。在3周的采样期内,每天记录采食量和产奶量;分别在预试期和试验期末采集血清和瘤胃液2次。对两个实验的数据进行了统计分析。E2组DM、牧草和大部分营养物质的摄取量均大于E1组,这可能与牧草品质的季节变化有关。E1期CON奶牛DM采食量低于FFP-奶牛,E2期CON奶牛DM采食量高于FFP+奶牛。在试验中,FFP-和FFP+奶牛的水溶性碳水化合物和脂肪摄入量高于CON奶牛,淀粉摄入量低于CON奶牛。E1组的能量校正产奶量大于E2组,且不受CCT的影响。在各试验中,CON奶牛的乳糖率最高、FFP-中间和FFP+最低,且FFP+奶牛的乳脂率高于CON奶牛。CON奶牛的平均和最大网状pH值在E1期低于FFP奶牛,E2期不受CCT的影响。无论试验结果如何,CON奶牛瘤胃液中乙酸含量均低于FFP-和FFP+奶牛。E2的甲烷产量大于E1,且不受CCT的影响。E2组的血清白蛋白、非酯化脂肪酸和葡萄糖水平随CCT的变化而变化,但E1组没有变化。将FFP和CBS与牧草结合使用可以在不损害健康的情况下提高泌乳早期奶牛营养的可持续性,但结果需要进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信