Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Improvement, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the iHOT-12, HOOS, and HOOSglobal in the Nonoperative Management of Nonarthritic Hip-Related Pain.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1177/03635465251325466
Abby L Cheng, Christopher M Radlicz, Madeline M Pashos, Julia B Huecker, Karen Steger-May, Heidi Prather, John C Clohisy, Marcie Harris-Hayes
{"title":"Defining the Minimal Clinically Important Improvement, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the iHOT-12, HOOS, and HOOS<sub>global</sub> in the Nonoperative Management of Nonarthritic Hip-Related Pain.","authors":"Abby L Cheng, Christopher M Radlicz, Madeline M Pashos, Julia B Huecker, Karen Steger-May, Heidi Prather, John C Clohisy, Marcie Harris-Hayes","doi":"10.1177/03635465251325466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Score cutoffs of clinically important outcome values such as the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) are population and treatment specific. In patients with nonarthritic hip-related pain, numerous score cutoffs have been calculated for use after surgical treatment, but they have not been established for patients who pursue nonoperative care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the MCII, SCB, and PASS score cutoffs for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and an 8-item abbreviated version of the HOOS (HOOS<sub>global</sub>) among patients with nonarthritic hip-related pain who were managed nonoperatively.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included 15- to 40-year-old patients who were diagnosed with nonarthritic hip-related pain by a surgical or nonsurgical orthopaedic clinician and were advised to pursue nonoperative management at the time of evaluation. At baseline and 12-month follow-up, patients completed the iHOT-12, HOOS, and HOOS<sub>global</sub>. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate MCII, SCB, and PASS score cutoffs using an anchor-based approach as well as score changes between baseline and 12 months. The anchor question for the MCII and SCB utilized a 9-item global rating of change scale. The anchor question for the PASS was as follows (\"yes\"/\"no\" response): \"Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 61 patients (mean age, 28 ± 8 years; 50 [82%] female), for the iHOT-12, the MCII score cutoff was 14, the SCB score cutoff was 18, and the PASS score cutoff was 63. For the HOOS subscales, the MCII score cutoffs ranged from 4 (Activities of Daily Living) to 13 (Sport and Recreation), the SCB score cutoffs ranged from 10 (Symptoms and Activities of Daily Living) to 25 (Quality of Life), and the PASS score cutoffs ranged from 50 (Quality of Life) to 87 (Activities of Daily Living). For the HOOS<sub>global</sub>, the MCII score cutoff was 5, the SCB score cutoff was 12, and the PASS score cutoff was 65. The models mostly had good responsiveness (area under the curve = 0.73-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These clinically important outcome values can assist clinicians and researchers with interpreting patients' clinical change during nonoperative treatment for nonarthritic hip-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1486-1493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251325466","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Score cutoffs of clinically important outcome values such as the minimal clinically important improvement (MCII), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) are population and treatment specific. In patients with nonarthritic hip-related pain, numerous score cutoffs have been calculated for use after surgical treatment, but they have not been established for patients who pursue nonoperative care.

Purpose: To determine the MCII, SCB, and PASS score cutoffs for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and an 8-item abbreviated version of the HOOS (HOOSglobal) among patients with nonarthritic hip-related pain who were managed nonoperatively.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: The cohort included 15- to 40-year-old patients who were diagnosed with nonarthritic hip-related pain by a surgical or nonsurgical orthopaedic clinician and were advised to pursue nonoperative management at the time of evaluation. At baseline and 12-month follow-up, patients completed the iHOT-12, HOOS, and HOOSglobal. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to generate MCII, SCB, and PASS score cutoffs using an anchor-based approach as well as score changes between baseline and 12 months. The anchor question for the MCII and SCB utilized a 9-item global rating of change scale. The anchor question for the PASS was as follows ("yes"/"no" response): "Taking into account all the activities you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your functional impairment, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?"

Results: Among 61 patients (mean age, 28 ± 8 years; 50 [82%] female), for the iHOT-12, the MCII score cutoff was 14, the SCB score cutoff was 18, and the PASS score cutoff was 63. For the HOOS subscales, the MCII score cutoffs ranged from 4 (Activities of Daily Living) to 13 (Sport and Recreation), the SCB score cutoffs ranged from 10 (Symptoms and Activities of Daily Living) to 25 (Quality of Life), and the PASS score cutoffs ranged from 50 (Quality of Life) to 87 (Activities of Daily Living). For the HOOSglobal, the MCII score cutoff was 5, the SCB score cutoff was 12, and the PASS score cutoff was 65. The models mostly had good responsiveness (area under the curve = 0.73-0.94).

Conclusion: These clinically important outcome values can assist clinicians and researchers with interpreting patients' clinical change during nonoperative treatment for nonarthritic hip-related pain.

确定iHOT-12、HOOS和HOOSglobal在非关节炎性髋关节相关疼痛非手术治疗中的最小临床重要改善、实质性临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
临床重要转归值的评分截止值,如最小临床重要改善(MCII)、实质性临床获益(SCB)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)是人群和治疗特异性的。对于非关节炎性髋关节相关疼痛的患者,已经计算了许多用于手术治疗后的评分截止点,但尚未建立用于追求非手术治疗的患者的评分截止点。目的:在非手术治疗的非关节炎性髋关节相关疼痛患者中,确定12项国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-12)、髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)和8项简略版HOOS (HOOSglobal)的MCII、SCB和PASS评分截止值。研究设计:队列研究;证据等级,4级。方法:该队列包括15至40岁的患者,这些患者被外科或非手术骨科临床医生诊断为非关节炎性髋关节相关疼痛,并在评估时被建议采用非手术治疗。在基线和12个月的随访中,患者完成了iHOT-12、HOOS和HOOSglobal。使用基于锚定的方法,使用受试者工作特征曲线生成MCII、SCB和PASS评分截止点,以及基线和12个月之间的评分变化。mci和SCB的锚定问题使用了9个项目的全球变化量表评级。PASS的主要问题如下(“是”/“否”回答):“考虑到你在日常生活中的所有活动,你的疼痛程度,以及你的功能障碍,你认为你目前的状态令人满意吗?”结果:61例患者(平均年龄28±8岁;50[82%]女性),iHOT-12的MCII分数线为14分,SCB分数线为18分,PASS分数线为63分。对于HOOS子量表,MCII分值从4分(日常生活活动)到13分(运动和娱乐),SCB分值从10分(症状和日常生活活动)到25分(生活质量),PASS分值从50分(生活质量)到87分(日常生活活动)。HOOSglobal的mci分数线为5分,SCB分数线为12分,PASS分数线为65分。大多数模型具有较好的响应性(曲线下面积= 0.73-0.94)。结论:这些临床重要的预后值可以帮助临床医生和研究人员解释非关节炎性髋关节相关疼痛非手术治疗期间患者的临床变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信