Specific types of anxiety regarding radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.

IF 4 3区医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01690-x

Shi-Jia Wang, Xin Feng, Wei Zhang, Hui Fang, Hao Jing, Yu Tang, Tao Li, Shu-Nan Qi, Yong-Wen Song, Wen-Wen Zhang, Ning-Ning Lu, Yuan Tang, Yue-Ping Liu, Bo Chen, Xin Liu, Ye-Xiong Li, Yi-Rui Zhai, Shu-Lian Wang

{"title":"Specific types of anxiety regarding radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Shi-Jia Wang, Xin Feng, Wei Zhang, Hui Fang, Hao Jing, Yu Tang, Tao Li, Shu-Nan Qi, Yong-Wen Song, Wen-Wen Zhang, Ning-Ning Lu, Yuan Tang, Yue-Ping Liu, Bo Chen, Xin Liu, Ye-Xiong Li, Yi-Rui Zhai, Shu-Lian Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01690-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The radiotherapy categorical anxiety scale (RCAS) was designed to evaluate the specific types of radiation therapy (RT)-related anxiety in cancer patients. We translated RCAS into Chinese, evaluated its reliability and validity in breast cancer (BC) patients, and used it to evaluate changes in specific types and levels of RT-related anxiety throughout RT.Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal study enrolling 504 Chinese BC patients receiving RT. The patients completed questionnaires assessing the specific types of RT-related anxiety (our Chinese version of RCAS), depression [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)], and anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)] before, during, and after RT. Emotional distress (ED) was defined as a PHQ-9 or GAD-7 score of > 4. Generalized estimating equation was performed to evaluate changes in total and subscale scores on RCAS. Multivariable general linear models were used to explore independent predictors of baseline RCAS scores.Results: Our Chinese version of RCAS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89-0.92). Our data demonstrated a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of 0.946 and P < 0.001 on the Bartlett sphericity test, indicating their suitability for subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA further demonstrated its adequate convergent and discriminant validity. The levels of anxiety related to RT environment decreased over time, whereas those of anxiety related to RT treatment efficacy remained stable throughout the treatment. Patients demonstrated higher scores on items regarding side effects and treatment efficacy of RT than on other items. ED before RT independently predicted for higher baseline RCAS score.Conclusions: Our Chinese version of the RCAS can be used to quantitatively evaluate specific types of RT-related anxiety in Chinese BC patients. Clinicians should pay more attention to anxiety regarding the side effects and treatment efficacy of RT reported by their patients, particularly those with baseline ED.","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01690-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The radiotherapy categorical anxiety scale (RCAS) was designed to evaluate the specific types of radiation therapy (RT)-related anxiety in cancer patients. We translated RCAS into Chinese, evaluated its reliability and validity in breast cancer (BC) patients, and used it to evaluate changes in specific types and levels of RT-related anxiety throughout RT.

Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal study enrolling 504 Chinese BC patients receiving RT. The patients completed questionnaires assessing the specific types of RT-related anxiety (our Chinese version of RCAS), depression [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)], and anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)] before, during, and after RT. Emotional distress (ED) was defined as a PHQ-9 or GAD-7 score of > 4. Generalized estimating equation was performed to evaluate changes in total and subscale scores on RCAS. Multivariable general linear models were used to explore independent predictors of baseline RCAS scores.

Results: Our Chinese version of RCAS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89-0.92). Our data demonstrated a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of 0.946 and P < 0.001 on the Bartlett sphericity test, indicating their suitability for subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA further demonstrated its adequate convergent and discriminant validity. The levels of anxiety related to RT environment decreased over time, whereas those of anxiety related to RT treatment efficacy remained stable throughout the treatment. Patients demonstrated higher scores on items regarding side effects and treatment efficacy of RT than on other items. ED before RT independently predicted for higher baseline RCAS score.

Conclusions: Our Chinese version of the RCAS can be used to quantitatively evaluate specific types of RT-related anxiety in Chinese BC patients. Clinicians should pay more attention to anxiety regarding the side effects and treatment efficacy of RT reported by their patients, particularly those with baseline ED.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

2.50%

发文量

105

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.