A systematic review of disease control strategies in beef cow-calf herds, part 2: preweaned calf morbidity and mortality associated with neonatal calf diarrhea and bovine respiratory disease.
V Margarita Sanguinetti, Kayla Strong, Samuel P Agbese, Cindy Adams, John Campbell, Sylvia L Checkley, Heather Ganshorn, M Claire Windeyer
{"title":"A systematic review of disease control strategies in beef cow-calf herds, part 2: preweaned calf morbidity and mortality associated with neonatal calf diarrhea and bovine respiratory disease.","authors":"V Margarita Sanguinetti, Kayla Strong, Samuel P Agbese, Cindy Adams, John Campbell, Sylvia L Checkley, Heather Ganshorn, M Claire Windeyer","doi":"10.1017/S1466252325000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preventing neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cow-calf herds is essential to optimizing calfhood health. Disease control can prevent morbidity and mortality; however, evidence concerning the effectiveness of practices to achieve this is limited. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of management practices to prevent calf morbidity and mortality from NCD and BRD in beef cow-calf herds. The population of interest was preweaned beef calves. The outcomes were calf morbidity and mortality caused by NCD and BRD. Only studies reporting naturally occurring diseases were included. Seventeen studies were deemed relevant, 6 studies of which were controlled trials or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 11 were observational studies. Most management practices had some evidence to support their use; however, the certainty of the findings was low to very low. Most of the practices were shown to impact both NCD and BRD. Yet, the different levels of consistency in the directionality of the findings suggest that some outcomes are more affected by some practices than others. More well-designed RCTs and cohort studies are required to provide reliable estimates to support recommended practices for cow-calf herds.</p>","PeriodicalId":51313,"journal":{"name":"Animal Health Research Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Health Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252325000039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preventing neonatal calf diarrhea (NCD) and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in cow-calf herds is essential to optimizing calfhood health. Disease control can prevent morbidity and mortality; however, evidence concerning the effectiveness of practices to achieve this is limited. The objective of this systematic review was to assess and summarize the evidence on the effectiveness of management practices to prevent calf morbidity and mortality from NCD and BRD in beef cow-calf herds. The population of interest was preweaned beef calves. The outcomes were calf morbidity and mortality caused by NCD and BRD. Only studies reporting naturally occurring diseases were included. Seventeen studies were deemed relevant, 6 studies of which were controlled trials or randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 11 were observational studies. Most management practices had some evidence to support their use; however, the certainty of the findings was low to very low. Most of the practices were shown to impact both NCD and BRD. Yet, the different levels of consistency in the directionality of the findings suggest that some outcomes are more affected by some practices than others. More well-designed RCTs and cohort studies are required to provide reliable estimates to support recommended practices for cow-calf herds.
期刊介绍:
Animal Health Research Reviews provides an international forum for the publication of reviews and commentaries on all aspects of animal health. Papers include in-depth analyses and broader overviews of all facets of health and science in both domestic and wild animals. Major subject areas include physiology and pharmacology, parasitology, bacteriology, food and environmental safety, epidemiology and virology. The journal is of interest to researchers involved in animal health, parasitologists, food safety experts and academics interested in all aspects of animal production and welfare.