Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Samantha Pelican Monson, Laura Ramzy, Shambhavi Prathap, Rocio I Pereira
{"title":"Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.","authors":"Samantha Pelican Monson, Laura Ramzy, Shambhavi Prathap, Rocio I Pereira","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health care organizations have recognized the necessity of addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related issues to promote anti-racism and improve workplace culture. Little is known about the short- and long-term impacts on staff perceptions of inclusion, psychological safety, and belongingness, or what aspects of DEI initiatives hold meaning and value for team members. In particular, the perspective of clinical staff identifying as racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC), who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, has been unclear and understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate what makes organizational DEI efforts meaningful and impactful in creating a sense of inclusion for POC clinic team members and identifies perceived barriers to inclusion efforts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted across 13 community health clinics within a safety-net health care system in Colorado. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 participants (77.5% female; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> 41; 77.5% POC). Participants' clinic roles included support staff team members (75%), medical providers (15%), and clinic leadership (10%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings illustrated elements of existing DEI initiatives, ranging from the most beneficial to the most detrimental, including some common across all participant groups and some unique to specific races and/or role groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All participants endorsed common beneficial elements of DEI initiatives. Participants identifying as POC and in roles with less power in the clinic (i.e., support staff members) shared elements with the potential to cause harm. Avoiding detrimental elements and incorporating beneficial elements will allow teams to engage in meaningful DEI initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health care organizations have recognized the necessity of addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related issues to promote anti-racism and improve workplace culture. Little is known about the short- and long-term impacts on staff perceptions of inclusion, psychological safety, and belongingness, or what aspects of DEI initiatives hold meaning and value for team members. In particular, the perspective of clinical staff identifying as racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC), who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, has been unclear and understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate what makes organizational DEI efforts meaningful and impactful in creating a sense of inclusion for POC clinic team members and identifies perceived barriers to inclusion efforts.

Method: A qualitative study was conducted across 13 community health clinics within a safety-net health care system in Colorado. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 participants (77.5% female; Mage 41; 77.5% POC). Participants' clinic roles included support staff team members (75%), medical providers (15%), and clinic leadership (10%).

Results: Findings illustrated elements of existing DEI initiatives, ranging from the most beneficial to the most detrimental, including some common across all participant groups and some unique to specific races and/or role groups.

Discussion: All participants endorsed common beneficial elements of DEI initiatives. Participants identifying as POC and in roles with less power in the clinic (i.e., support staff members) shared elements with the potential to cause harm. Avoiding detrimental elements and incorporating beneficial elements will allow teams to engage in meaningful DEI initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

多元、公平与包容:社区健康诊所团队成员观点的质性研究。
导言:卫生保健组织已经认识到解决多样性、公平和包容(DEI)相关问题的必要性,以促进反种族主义和改善工作场所文化。对于员工对包容、心理安全和归属感的看法的短期和长期影响,或者DEI计划的哪些方面对团队成员具有意义和价值,我们知之甚少。特别是,被认为是少数族裔/有色人种(POC)的临床工作人员的观点,他们在团队中不成比例地占据着支持人员的角色,在团队中权力较小,这一点一直不清楚,也没有得到充分的研究。本研究的目的是探讨是什么使组织的DEI努力在为POC诊所团队成员创造包容感方面有意义和有影响力,并确定包容努力的感知障碍。方法:一项定性研究进行了13个社区卫生诊所内的安全网卫生保健系统在科罗拉多州。对40名参与者进行了半结构化访谈(77.5%为女性;法师41;77.5% POC)。参与者的临床角色包括支持人员团队成员(75%)、医疗提供者(15%)和临床领导(10%)。结果:调查结果说明了现有的DEI倡议的要素,从最有益的到最有害的,包括一些在所有参与者群体中普遍存在的,以及一些特定种族和/或角色群体所特有的。讨论:所有与会者都赞同DEI倡议的共同有益因素。被确定为POC的参与者和在诊所中权力较小的角色(即支持人员)具有共同的可能造成伤害的因素。避免有害因素并结合有益因素将允许团队参与有意义的DEI计划。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信