Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Samantha Pelican Monson, Laura Ramzy, Shambhavi Prathap, Rocio I Pereira
{"title":"Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives: A qualitative study on community health clinic team member perspectives.","authors":"Samantha Pelican Monson, Laura Ramzy, Shambhavi Prathap, Rocio I Pereira","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health care organizations have recognized the necessity of addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related issues to promote anti-racism and improve workplace culture. Little is known about the short- and long-term impacts on staff perceptions of inclusion, psychological safety, and belongingness, or what aspects of DEI initiatives hold meaning and value for team members. In particular, the perspective of clinical staff identifying as racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC), who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, has been unclear and understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate what makes organizational DEI efforts meaningful and impactful in creating a sense of inclusion for POC clinic team members and identifies perceived barriers to inclusion efforts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted across 13 community health clinics within a safety-net health care system in Colorado. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 participants (77.5% female; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> 41; 77.5% POC). Participants' clinic roles included support staff team members (75%), medical providers (15%), and clinic leadership (10%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings illustrated elements of existing DEI initiatives, ranging from the most beneficial to the most detrimental, including some common across all participant groups and some unique to specific races and/or role groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All participants endorsed common beneficial elements of DEI initiatives. Participants identifying as POC and in roles with less power in the clinic (i.e., support staff members) shared elements with the potential to cause harm. Avoiding detrimental elements and incorporating beneficial elements will allow teams to engage in meaningful DEI initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health care organizations have recognized the necessity of addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related issues to promote anti-racism and improve workplace culture. Little is known about the short- and long-term impacts on staff perceptions of inclusion, psychological safety, and belongingness, or what aspects of DEI initiatives hold meaning and value for team members. In particular, the perspective of clinical staff identifying as racial-ethnic minorities/persons of color (POC), who disproportionately occupy support staff roles with less power on the team, has been unclear and understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate what makes organizational DEI efforts meaningful and impactful in creating a sense of inclusion for POC clinic team members and identifies perceived barriers to inclusion efforts.

Method: A qualitative study was conducted across 13 community health clinics within a safety-net health care system in Colorado. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 participants (77.5% female; Mage 41; 77.5% POC). Participants' clinic roles included support staff team members (75%), medical providers (15%), and clinic leadership (10%).

Results: Findings illustrated elements of existing DEI initiatives, ranging from the most beneficial to the most detrimental, including some common across all participant groups and some unique to specific races and/or role groups.

Discussion: All participants endorsed common beneficial elements of DEI initiatives. Participants identifying as POC and in roles with less power in the clinic (i.e., support staff members) shared elements with the potential to cause harm. Avoiding detrimental elements and incorporating beneficial elements will allow teams to engage in meaningful DEI initiatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信