Usefulness of computed tomography-guided puncture biopsy coupled with rapid on‑site evaluation for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2024.17895
Zhongbao Zhang, Rui Liu, JunLin Li, Kai Zhang, Yuan Li, Xiaoqin Zhang, Sanjay Rastogi
{"title":"Usefulness of computed tomography-guided puncture biopsy coupled with rapid on‑site evaluation for diagnosis of pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.","authors":"Zhongbao Zhang, Rui Liu, JunLin Li, Kai Zhang, Yuan Li, Xiaoqin Zhang, Sanjay Rastogi","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2024.17895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate identification of lung lesions during lung biopsy (LB) surgery can be achieved with the use of computed tomography (CT) guidance. The rapid on‑site evaluation (ROSE) method allows for quick assessment of the features, cytomorphological traits, and appropriateness of the obtained tissue samples, and might further accelerate the diagnostic workup.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CT‑guided aspiration biopsy combined with ROSE for assessment of pulmonary lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A PubMed and Embase search was undertaken until October 2023 to find studies on lung lesion diagnosis utilizing CT‑guided needle biopsy and ROSE. The main method for assessing bias and relevance was the updated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Research 2 tool. The threshold effect and subgroup analysis were used to determine the source or heterogeneity. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC AUC), and the Q‑index were calculated. The Deek funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 studies (n = 951) with mild heterogeneity were included in this meta‑analysis, yielding a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.9-0.98), and 159.05 (95% CI, 69.59-363.49), respectively. The SROC AUC, calculated using a random‑effects model, was 0.98. Subgroup analysis showed that study design (prospective vs retrospective) had an impact on sensitivity. Further analysis of 3 studies that established control groups showed that the ROSE group had by 12% (95% CI, 0.08-0.16; I<sup>2</sup> = 0) higher sampling adequacy and diagnostic accuracy than the non‑ROSE group, while there was no significant difference in the rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For assessment of pulmonary lesions, CT‑guided puncture biopsy combined with ROSE has high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, and is a practical operational method that merits wide clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"19 3","pages":"299-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2024.17895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate identification of lung lesions during lung biopsy (LB) surgery can be achieved with the use of computed tomography (CT) guidance. The rapid on‑site evaluation (ROSE) method allows for quick assessment of the features, cytomorphological traits, and appropriateness of the obtained tissue samples, and might further accelerate the diagnostic workup.

Aim: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of CT‑guided aspiration biopsy combined with ROSE for assessment of pulmonary lesions.

Materials and methods: A PubMed and Embase search was undertaken until October 2023 to find studies on lung lesion diagnosis utilizing CT‑guided needle biopsy and ROSE. The main method for assessing bias and relevance was the updated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Research 2 tool. The threshold effect and subgroup analysis were used to determine the source or heterogeneity. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC AUC), and the Q‑index were calculated. The Deek funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.

Results: A total of 6 studies (n = 951) with mild heterogeneity were included in this meta‑analysis, yielding a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.9-0.98), and 159.05 (95% CI, 69.59-363.49), respectively. The SROC AUC, calculated using a random‑effects model, was 0.98. Subgroup analysis showed that study design (prospective vs retrospective) had an impact on sensitivity. Further analysis of 3 studies that established control groups showed that the ROSE group had by 12% (95% CI, 0.08-0.16; I2 = 0) higher sampling adequacy and diagnostic accuracy than the non‑ROSE group, while there was no significant difference in the rate of complications.

Conclusions: For assessment of pulmonary lesions, CT‑guided puncture biopsy combined with ROSE has high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, and is a practical operational method that merits wide clinical application.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信