Does a Targeted Engagement and Diversion program reduce emergency department utilization?

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00888-4
Rebecca Seliga, Krishan Yadav, Caroline Hodgins, Maria Jaramillo, Christina Masters, Jamie Muckle, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Ariel Hendin, Debra Eagles, Rakesh Patel
{"title":"Does a Targeted Engagement and Diversion program reduce emergency department utilization?","authors":"Rebecca Seliga, Krishan Yadav, Caroline Hodgins, Maria Jaramillo, Christina Masters, Jamie Muckle, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Ariel Hendin, Debra Eagles, Rakesh Patel","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00888-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Targeted Engagement and Diversion (TED) program in Ottawa provides health care to unhoused or shelter/community housed adults outside of an emergency department (ED) setting. We sought to determine the proportion of patients diverted away from the ED by the TED program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a health records review of adult patients who visited the TED program from January to December 2022 using random sampling to account for seasonal variation. Data were extracted from the Ottawa Inner City Health database and hospital records from two university-affiliated EDs. The primary outcome was successful diversion from the ED, defined as any of the following: TED program patients (i) presenting in the evening or overnight; (ii) brought in by police/paramedic services; (iii) referred from the safe consumption site; (iv) assessed by a nurse or physician; (v) admitted for higher level of observation; or (vi) that received an antidote (e.g., naloxone). Data were described using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 500 total visits of 241 unique patients (76.3% male, median age 38 years). The most common reason for presentation was unspecified intoxication (83.4%, n = 417). A total of 359 visits met criteria for successful diversion from the ED (71.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-75.6). Most patients who met diversion criteria revisited the TED program within 7 days (82.8%, n = 323), whereas 7.9% (n = 31) visited an ED within 7 days. At 2 years, 39% (n = 94) of all patients were stably housed and 10.8% (n = 26) died.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TED program may be successful at attracting patients and diverting their care away from busy local EDs, and few patients treated by the TED program visited the ED within the subsequent 7 days. This model of care may provide a solution to offload from overcrowded EDs and improve access to comprehensive care for patients who are unhoused.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00888-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Targeted Engagement and Diversion (TED) program in Ottawa provides health care to unhoused or shelter/community housed adults outside of an emergency department (ED) setting. We sought to determine the proportion of patients diverted away from the ED by the TED program.

Methods: We conducted a health records review of adult patients who visited the TED program from January to December 2022 using random sampling to account for seasonal variation. Data were extracted from the Ottawa Inner City Health database and hospital records from two university-affiliated EDs. The primary outcome was successful diversion from the ED, defined as any of the following: TED program patients (i) presenting in the evening or overnight; (ii) brought in by police/paramedic services; (iii) referred from the safe consumption site; (iv) assessed by a nurse or physician; (v) admitted for higher level of observation; or (vi) that received an antidote (e.g., naloxone). Data were described using descriptive statistics.

Results: We reviewed 500 total visits of 241 unique patients (76.3% male, median age 38 years). The most common reason for presentation was unspecified intoxication (83.4%, n = 417). A total of 359 visits met criteria for successful diversion from the ED (71.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 67.7-75.6). Most patients who met diversion criteria revisited the TED program within 7 days (82.8%, n = 323), whereas 7.9% (n = 31) visited an ED within 7 days. At 2 years, 39% (n = 94) of all patients were stably housed and 10.8% (n = 26) died.

Conclusion: The TED program may be successful at attracting patients and diverting their care away from busy local EDs, and few patients treated by the TED program visited the ED within the subsequent 7 days. This model of care may provide a solution to offload from overcrowded EDs and improve access to comprehensive care for patients who are unhoused.

目标:渥太华的 "有针对性的参与和分流(TED)"计划在急诊科(ED)之外为无住房或有住房/社区的成年人提供医疗服务。我们试图确定通过 TED 计划从急诊室分流出来的患者比例:我们采用随机抽样的方式,对 2022 年 1 月至 12 月期间到 TED 计划就诊的成年患者进行了健康记录审查,以考虑季节性变化。数据来自渥太华内城健康数据库和两所大学附属急诊室的住院记录。主要结果是成功从急诊室转出,定义为以下任何一种情况:TED项目患者:(i) 在傍晚或夜间就诊;(ii) 由警察/急救人员送来;(iii) 由安全消费场所转诊;(iv) 由护士或医生评估;(v) 入院接受更高级别的观察;或 (vi) 接受解毒剂(如纳洛酮)治疗。数据采用描述性统计方法进行描述:我们对 241 名患者(76.3% 为男性,中位年龄为 38 岁)的 500 次就诊进行了审查。最常见的就诊原因是不明中毒(83.4%,n = 417)。共有 359 人次符合从急诊室成功转院的标准(71.8%,95% 置信区间 (CI) 67.7-75.6)。大多数符合分流标准的患者在 7 天内(82.8%,n = 323)再次访问了 TED 项目,而 7.9% 的患者(n = 31)在 7 天内访问了急诊室。2年后,39%的患者(n = 94)获得了稳定住所,10.8%的患者(n = 26)死亡:TED项目可能成功地吸引了患者,并将他们的治疗从繁忙的当地急诊室分流出来,接受TED项目治疗的患者在随后的7天内很少去急诊室就诊。这种护理模式可为过度拥挤的急诊室分流提供解决方案,并改善无住房患者获得全面护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信