Comparison of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules performed with and without the coaxial technique.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2024-12-02 eCollection Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2024.17917
Qun-Qun Zhu, Li Zhang, Fengfei Xia, Yi-Bing Shi, Lei Zhu, Xian-Xian Liang
{"title":"Comparison of computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules performed with and without the coaxial technique.","authors":"Qun-Qun Zhu, Li Zhang, Fengfei Xia, Yi-Bing Shi, Lei Zhu, Xian-Xian Liang","doi":"10.20452/wiitm.2024.17917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is a common method for diagnosing pulmonary nodules (PNs). It is often performed using the coaxial technique (CAT) to streamline the process.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the safety and diagnostic performance of CT-guided CNB with and without CAT for diagnosing PNs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included patients undergoing CT-guided CNB for a diagnosis of PNs between January 2017 and December 2019. The study population was divided according to the use of CAT for the biopsy. Procedure-related data, diagnostic accuracy and yield, and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 111 and 108 patients underwent CT-guided CNB with and without CAT, respectively. As compared with the non-CAT group, the CAT group showed a lower mean needle pathway number (<i>P</i> <⁠0.001), a higher mean sample number (<i>P</i> <⁠0.001), and shorter procedural duration (<i>P </i><⁠0.001). Diagnostic accuracy was similar between the 2 groups (98.3% vs 96.3%, respectively, for CAT vs non-CAT; <i>P</i> = 0.6), though the CAT group demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield than the non-CAT group (81.4% vs 68.5%; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage rates did not differ between the 2 groups (<i>P</i> = 0.09 and <i>P</i> = 0.16, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT-guided CNB with CAT demonstrated greater procedural efficiency, with fewer needle pathways, shorter operative duration, and improved diagnostic yield, as compared with procedures performed without CAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"19 3","pages":"476-482"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/wiitm.2024.17917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is a common method for diagnosing pulmonary nodules (PNs). It is often performed using the coaxial technique (CAT) to streamline the process.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the safety and diagnostic performance of CT-guided CNB with and without CAT for diagnosing PNs.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included patients undergoing CT-guided CNB for a diagnosis of PNs between January 2017 and December 2019. The study population was divided according to the use of CAT for the biopsy. Procedure-related data, diagnostic accuracy and yield, and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: During the study period, a total of 111 and 108 patients underwent CT-guided CNB with and without CAT, respectively. As compared with the non-CAT group, the CAT group showed a lower mean needle pathway number (P <⁠0.001), a higher mean sample number (P <⁠0.001), and shorter procedural duration (<⁠0.001). Diagnostic accuracy was similar between the 2 groups (98.3% vs 96.3%, respectively, for CAT vs non-CAT; P = 0.6), though the CAT group demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield than the non-CAT group (81.4% vs 68.5%; P = 0.03). Pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage rates did not differ between the 2 groups (P = 0.09 and P = 0.16, respectively).

Conclusions: CT-guided CNB with CAT demonstrated greater procedural efficiency, with fewer needle pathways, shorter operative duration, and improved diagnostic yield, as compared with procedures performed without CAT.

采用和不采用同轴技术的计算机断层引导下肺结节芯针活检的比较。
计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下的核心穿刺活检(CNB)是诊断肺结节(PNs)的常用方法。它通常使用同轴技术(CAT)来简化过程。目的:本研究旨在比较ct引导下CNB在有和没有CAT的情况下诊断PNs的安全性和诊断性能。材料和方法:本回顾性分析包括2017年1月至2019年12月期间接受ct引导下CNB诊断PNs的患者。根据使用CAT进行活检来划分研究人群。比较两组手术相关数据、诊断准确性、诊断率和并发症发生率。结果:在研究期间,分别有111例和108例患者接受了ct引导下的CNB伴CAT和不伴CAT。与非CAT组相比,CAT组的平均针路数较低(P P P P = 0.6),尽管CAT组的诊断率高于非CAT组(81.4% vs 68.5%;P = 0.03)。两组间气胸和肺出血发生率无显著差异(P = 0.09和P = 0.16)。结论:与不进行CAT的手术相比,ct引导下的CNB具有更高的手术效率,针头路径更少,手术时间更短,诊断率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信